MSC Shekar
14 April 2012 at 13:04
In a Specific Relief suit consiting of Plaintiff (Private Party) and two Defendants both Govt. Departments.
Matter relates to Treasury which under the Audit Authority of Principal Accountant General Of India.
Defendant 1 is set Exparte and D2 has filed a false Written Statement which was recently discovered as Fraud committing willful purgery. This was discovered when the Pricipal Accountant General has clarified some matter thru Right To Information relating to Office of D2.
The stage has come for Trial. Since D2 has involved in willful purgery is there any way to deny them Cross Examination of Plaintiff (Reason filing false Written Statement which was proved by a RTI Information given by Principal Accountant General) ?
Is there as legal process to Deny Defendants commiting/committed purgery from cross examining the Plaintiff?
Thanks in advance
rajvinder singh
14 April 2012 at 13:01
the suit for possession by way of partition is decreed .preliminary decree has been passed,now appliaction for passing final decree has been made,now what can defendants do at this stage.
the application under order 20 rulw 18 has been given by plainitiff demanding the property to be divided in two equal parts.what defendant can plead on mode of partition.
what i think in the case is the court will appoint LC.defendant need not to gve application for lc appointment.further lc will submit his report and defendant will file objections on the report they will be decided and then finally decree will be passed.then plaintiff will file execution petition to get the possession.
is this a right procedure or not.
further if defendant is ready to give half of share to plaintiff then he can give a statement to the effect in the court.but i donot know when he can give such statement either before ar after the appointment of LC.
'
Atul Jain
14 April 2012 at 12:43
if a temporary injunction order has been passed against the defendant for not doing any further construction on a common wall and maintaining status quo , is the plaintiff also bound by the same order , can the plaintiff do construction on the common wall . If the plaintiff does the construction on the common wall or on part of the commmon wall , then will the status remain the same ?
Ankit
14 April 2012 at 12:21
I have a Moot court Competition Regarding which I need Help. The facts of case are-
A lady underwent hysterectomy (surgical removal Of Uterus) in hospital. She was discharged upon by Dr. Jeevan10 days after the operation even though her medical condition was very bad and before the stitches were removed, she was discharged by Dr. Jeevan. The condition of lady further deteriorated. when she again went back to the hospital after a few days she was adviced to come after 2 months since Dr. Jeevan had gone abroad. having no other option, she sought treatment in another hospital where an operation was performed and it was discovered that half a meter of sponge has been left in her stomach during the hysterectomy. it was because of this that her condition had deteriorated and her intestines had developed gangrene and there was puss formation. to save her life, a part of her intestine was removed and she had to incur a great deal of pain as well as expenditure on her treatment. She filed suit for damages of rs 10 laks from the hospital and Dr. Jeevan
I am counsel for defendant,
What defenses can I take And In which court the case is to be filed Consumer court Or civil Court(In Tort For Negligence)
Please help and reply soon as possible
vinaykala
14 April 2012 at 12:04
dear sir,
please tell me in the simplest terms for a layman as to what is adverse possession and what are its characteristics
vinay kala april 14,12
rajvinder singh
14 April 2012 at 11:37
the suit for possession by way of partition is decreed .preliminary decree has been passed,now appliaction for passing final decree has been made,now what can defendants do at this stage.
the application under order 20 rulw 18 has been given by plainitiff demanding the property to be divided in two equal parts.what defendant can plead on mode of partition
harish
14 April 2012 at 11:35
Dear Sir, I took a personal loan from several indian mnc banks in my own name and son and wifes names i was running a construction business in delhi well and suddenly the ceiling law came into action from delhi govt and i got into lot of troubles and stopped paying these loans since 4 years and changed my residence and liquidated whole of my assets, now after 4 years 3 goons from one mnc banks suddenly entered my house forcibly and threatened for recovery of loan, i told them that as on today i am left with only hand to mouth position and left with no assets at all, so u please tell your bank to file a legal proceedings in the matter and put me in jail or the worst they can do they must do but they kept on threatening me and said that they are going to make my mental position worsen in coming days, please let me know whats the maximum extent they can do and bank can do as i was holding a very good track record with banks since last 10 years with these banks and was regularly paying till my business got into trouble.
Please tell me upto what extent these goons sent from banks do and what bank can legally do maximum as i am holding zero assets as on date, moreover what organisation these persons are coming from is J M FINANCIAL SERVICES and i took a loan from HSBC and HSBC after that loan becoming a four year old NPA sold it to J M FINANCIAL NOW. Please tell me anything i can do legally in matter.
sk
13 April 2012 at 23:51
Under which circumstances the Court has power to attached the Salary of Govt. Employees.
Whether the salary of govt. employee can be attached if he did not fulfill his duty?
Niny
13 April 2012 at 16:16
If Landlord have room on first floor, and not residing there. To vacate tenant, he himself break cement roof, to harass him, this is same situation. BMC ask NOC of Owner, who refused to give. .
What can be done ??
Can tenant repair , entering owner's room. ??
It is not possible to go up without entering 1st floor[top floor] room in his possession.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Injunction
Sir, whether the husband is entitled injunction restraining his wife to donate kidney as she is suffering from gynic problem. if so please inform any decission with regard to my querry.