AMAN
23 April 2012 at 17:04
Hi,
I have applied for a Credit Card in Dubai, U.A.E.
Now, I would like to know that any UAE bank is allowed to do the physical verification about the address and other details in India.What are the jurisdiction for the bank?
An early reply will be highly appreciated.
Thks,
Jogendra
23 April 2012 at 16:18
Hello,
I have given Some money to my friend as he required for his business. He Said me in good faith that he will return me back by 1 year. He failed to give me. While giving money I took a promissory note from him.
I am staying in Karnataka and the promissory note was brought from a stationory shop and I pasted 1 revenue ticket on it and got it signed by my friend.
Now Since, He is not giving back my Money I had filed a civil suit against him.
Can you Please let me know:-
1) How much strong evidence the promissory note can be.
2)Can on Basis of promissory note I demmand my money and the court can issue a order in favour of me.
Please help me.
Maulin Shah
23 April 2012 at 16:04
Please Cancel the Previous query and reply this query.
Mr. "A"(husband) married with "B" (first wife) before 1986. He again married with "C’’(Second wife) in 1986 through registered marriage mentioning in the application form that he (mr.A) is unmarried B(first wife) has three children today and "C" (Second wife) has two children . There was a mutual understanding (agreement) between A & B in the civil court that "A" will give some maintenance to B alongwith residential house and 2 vigha land, A is doing job in Secondary School sine 1990, Some or other reason dispute arise between "A&"B" for land which was not handed over by "A" to "B" and maintenance not increased. The complain made to the Collector and District Education Officer(DEO) Panchmahals regarding Poly.gamy. which is proved in the family Court and court passed order that "A" has two wives. The matter filed by "A" before Guj. High Court and High court dismissed the appeal and cofirm the order of family court. Now Enquiry Committee is appointed as per advise of D.E.O. Now as per our opinion for "A" it is a moral turputide, and as it is moral tunpitide as per Guj.Secondary Education Act & Bombay Service rules, he should be dismiss. Whether we are right i.e. whether we can dismiss. Mr. A. Whether there is any loss to the institutional school? Please advise
Your honour have given a opinion as under :
You being management are duty bound to maintain your discipline and take appropriate action against A. The only action in such situation can be DISMISSAL FROM SERVICE WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT.
Expert Pradeepkumar has opined as under :-
Mr.Makkd is correct, take a step further, according to Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, 2nd marriage without divorce from the earlier partner, or death of earlier partner is illegal. Though Hon'ble Family Court orders are there, but it has to be seen whether under the said rules, for such an act of an employee a inquiry is required or he could be dismissed straightway. If enquiry is prescribed, then go issue a chargesheet, hold proper inquiry and only thereafter take action such as dismissal, that too do not show in advance your intensions to do so.
Expert Mr. P.S.Dhingra also endorsed the view :
- Now under following circumstances , what will be the position :
"B" (First wife) has filed a suit before 1999 against "A" (her husband) who remarried with "C" (Second wife) without divorce. but suit dismissed for some or other reason No appeal filed.
Again filed a criminal complain by "B" (First wife) against "A" (Hunband) and "C" (Second wife) u/s 494. The complain was dismissed and Mr."B" and Mr."C" (Second wife) were acquitted. No appeal was filed. Mr. A husband filed a suit against B(first wife) stating that B is not legally married wife. In the Suit following issues were framed.
(1) Whether the plaintiff proves that the Defendant is not legally wife of him ? - In negative
(2) Whether the plaintiff proves that the Defendant has filed false cases for harassing and grabbing money from him ?
- In Negative
(3) Whether the Defendant proves that the marriage life goes 11 years and during wed-lock, three children, namely, Bhavisha, Jalpa and son Utpal were born ? - In affirmative
(4) Whether the Defendant proves that plaint of Plaintiff is not tenable ? - In affirmative
(5) Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to get a prayed as prayed for ? - In negative
(6) What order and decree ? - As per Final Order.
After family court has observed as under order dated : 29/1/2011. :
The Defendant "B"(First Wife) has every reason to stay separate from plaintiff. The plaintiff "A"(Husband) is remarried and no woman can stay with another woman. The plaintiff is a legal husband of the Defendant.
The High court dismiss the appeal filed against family court judgment and confirm that "A" is remarried.
In this matter Mr."A" is remarried or not may not be a issue in the family court but it is proved in the family court as per observation that Mr."A" in remarried and according to Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 2nd Marriage without divorce from the earlier partner is illegal. No actions were taken and therefore the complain by "B" (First wife)
Whether any punishment can be imposed under above observations of the Court. - Enquiry Committee has only to decide the matter that whether action like dismissal can be taken ? We think that we can dismiss and enquiry committee can give report accordingly.
Your honour is requested to opine.
jothiramesh
23 April 2012 at 08:36
Dear Experts, TNHB has alloted a piece of land with builup some extent as per application issued one. At the same time TNHB has informed me a extra land is added over my plot and ask me to pay the extra amount to take over the plot. if not paid the extra cost of land my allotment will be cancelled said TNHB. In this circumses extra land cost is paid.Balance amount for actual land cost also paid in piece male and lum sum totaly paid.
after paid total amount i request the TNHB for issuence of Sales deed. But the ignore and refuse to issue sale deed for the total extent what they have allotted.
I request the experter, let me know the rights of mine in this dispute, how and where i can approach for getting the totaly alloted land and sale deed.
if any other information need regarding this please touch with my e mail jothiram_ram@yaoo.com
Jothiram
Dear EXPERTS of the forum,
In a situation( during issuing of ORC certificate for Inam land, In state of A.P ), in an order of the Revenue Divisional Officer;RDO used the word( as per the documents submitted by me) that I am the Legal HEIR of Mrs."R". Can, I legally use this for asking right in some other lands(/situations) existing on Mrs."R".
My case is running in a District court for partition of property in the same family. Will this Order is + ve or -ve?
Please give me your opinion.
Thanking YOU ALL, in advance expecting an early reply.
atul
23 April 2012 at 03:06
is there any diference between interim order or interlocutory order.are both same things?in respect of which one revision lies.
SATYANARAYAN PATEL
23 April 2012 at 00:02
Sir, my elder father is a senior congressman aged about 70+ years. He is affected by asthma and not in a condition to move outside home in the winter. In a mass movement he has been prosecuted under protection of sc/st law. Later on he was granted bail on the same case. the arrest warrant was pending at the police station. Owing to the pending warrant the police arrested him, irrespective of his verbal representations and several requests by us regarding his bail order. the reference was produced, but the police arrested him from his home and taken away to the court of sdjm in bare body without an escort though he was ill and allergic to cold.
After producing before the judge, he was just released saying there was no necessity of arresting him as he is on bail. the act of police was against the civil rights of a senior citizen like him. It is his innocence and weakness that he can proceed against the police. I am not sure about the law against violation of civic rights by the police.
It is an incident of January 2012. Kindly suggest for any relief or cause of action in this regard. many innocent people are being harassed by the police in such cases.
Whether it comes under the violation of human rights or violation of civil rights of a senior citizen with ill health condition. Kindly suggest the best!
sirs,
i have an interesting question to put before you. please go through the question carefully and give me an apt reply.
I am staying in the heart of calicut corporation city, just 5 meters away from the railway track. i have a narrow pathway to my house from the road adjacent to the said railway track.pathway is our property. my pathway is so narrow that a car can hardly enter through the said pathway. now , i am planning to buy a car also !
now, a person has bought the adjacent land and it is reliably learned that he is all set to build a big shopping complex in the said land.
now, i am very much in need of a small portion of land , just to widen the pathway , so that , a car can easily enter through our pathway.
i have several options for this.my present idea is that we are ready to give the whole pathway to him, and in exchange , we will ask for a a little more wider pathway through the other side of our property , so that a car can easily enter through the new road.in this exchange we are giving more land , and asks only a smaller land for road.
here, i could not meet the concerned man till now , as he is abroad.
my question is that if he refuses such an exchange , have i got any other option by approaching a civil court ?
my mother is so old and sick that a motor car has become a necessity now-a-days !
(1) whether i can enforce this right of way " for a car ", through any civil courts ?
(2) whether a person can build a big shopping complex in a residential area ?
(3)whether i can object his attempt of building a shopping complex, stating that it obstructs the free access of light and air to the near by my residence ?
(4) is there any rule that a construction of shopping complex should be ....... km away from the railway property.....?
(5) where any such provision is discussed
in RAILWAY ACT or CORPORATION ACT ?
(6)whether i can claim the right of way "FOR MOTOR VEHICLES ", as a matter of right ,by filing a WRIT in high court ?
(7) or if he refuses to give a broader way, i have no other option , but just to go through my old narrow pathway and forget about buying a new car ?
prashant pawar
22 April 2012 at 22:50
My great grandfather(A) had a land 44 acres with 10 patners in it in 1953, (A) had 4acres of share in it, in 1968 out of 10 patners, 4 patners sold their share 16 acres to my father (B) and the remaining 6 patners left their share to (A), so (A) had a share of 28 acres and (B) had share of 16 acres. in the same month (A) transfered his share of 28 acres to my father(B) saying that (B) will be the only holder of that 28 acres. the whole property got transfered to my father(B). this property was transfered to my father when he was 21 years of age and was taking education and was not married. In 1971 (A) died and in 1992(B) died. As a legal hier property got transfered to me, my younger sister and my mother.
my father had 5 brothers, now my uncles r asking for a share in this property and filed a partition suite against us in the court in the year 2006. saying that the property is huf.
they had got individual property given by my great grandfather which were purchased by him. they have sold all the properties.
and now r asking for a share in my property,they hv filed a suite against us, and have succeeded in getting lease pendency.
plz guide me what shld i do?
Stampiing in agreement
Dear Sir,
I have some query that,
Scenario.1. Agreement date prior to stamp paper or stamping date.
Scenario.2. Stamp paper purchased in the name other than the person executed it.
In this issue whether the documents executed with the above type valid or not ?
Along with the loan agreement, we hold title deed, plans, pattas etc with pronote and Security cheque with us-Whether can we have a hold on this case.
My fore most query is that, With this kind of defect in loan agreement can i defend the case for the financier with other documents except the loan agreement.
Is it the loan agreement is mandatory evidence.Please advice me.