4WhatIsRight
28 September 2012 at 23:32
one of my muslim friend married a hindu girl in 1997, under special marriage act.
in 1999 after a heated argument my friend divorced his wife by saying TALAQ thrice and destroyed the marriage certificate.
after some counselling by friends and well wishers both agreed to reunite.
they again married under special marriage act got a new marriage certificate, followed by nikaah.
now in 2012 after lot of rethinking both have decided to go for divorce / dissolution of marriage/nikaah.
now will saying talaq thrice will amount to divorce or what procedure they need to go thru to get divorce.
robin
28 September 2012 at 22:04
if a FIR lodged how much time generally police take to take action?
if there is no political pressure
generally normally how much time POLICE take to take action?
a girl threated me that she want to make a FIR against me.she told me that I had abused her. so she want to make a FIR.
but I haven't abused her atall.
she is threatening me.
The girl is not a good girl atall. so I am very much worried.
I have'nt abused her atall.
hari sri chunduru
28 September 2012 at 21:14
I HAVE HEARD THAT THERE CANNOT BE ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN THE MONEY MATTERS ARBITRATION THAT TOO BETWEEN INDEPENDENT PERSON FOR AN UNREGISTERED PARTNERSHIP AND UNREGISTERED m.o.u what is the latest supremecourt of india jdugement or andhra pradesh high court judgements in this case
hari sri chunduru
28 September 2012 at 21:09
I WANT HEARD THAT SUPREME COURT OF INDIA HAS SAID ARBITRATION AGREEMENT CAN BEE IN-BETWEEN FIRMS AND NOT INDEPENDENT PARTIES IN 138 n.i act and on the basis of unregistered m.o.u
Sanjay Agarwal
28 September 2012 at 19:40
what is the court!s view on installation. of iron gates by resident welfare associations on public roads in colony. citations please
gurpreet singh
28 September 2012 at 19:29
we are defendants in the civil suit,and ld.judge given order against us for injunction on the basis of the forged photocopied document which was challenged during trial,and we also place on record the expert report which declare the forgery,we also filed an application under rule 7(14) to produce the original documents on which the plaintiffs sues,But the ld.judge ignored our request and implied injunction against us,which the impuned order is challenged in the high court and date of hearing is fixed after 3 months, The ld.judge announce at the time of impuned order that the original documents will be seen on evidence, Now the evidence trial is near by date and we want to know that how can we insist the court to get produce he original documents from the opposite party under which sec.or order so that the original documents can be send for comparison to govt,forensic lab for getting equity, and fair justice .plz suggest.
SHIESTA007
28 September 2012 at 19:01
Dear Team,
The plaintiff has filed a suit for declaration and during the pending of the suit the Defendant no - 4 sold the suit property to Defendant no -5 . The Plaintiff had filed an injunction order against him but the application filed by the plaintiff got dismissed. Then the Plaintiff filed an appeal in district court and it also got dismissed. During the pending of the suit the Defendant no -5 high handedly constructed a building in the suit property.
Then the Plaintiff filed a writ petition and got directions from the high court that the defendants should not go with the further construction and should stop immediately and there was a time bound from the high court to dispose of the matter.
Now, when the defendant no -5 , has come to know that he cannot succeed in the case is making attempt to sale the suit property to another person .
The stage of the case at present is for defendants evidence. And the defendants are not willing to step the witness box.
Can the plaintiff in this case give in writing to the sub-register about the suit pendency and ask him not to register any such transactions that comes regarding the suit property?
I thank the team in advance whoever replies.
sundararajan
28 September 2012 at 16:10
I am 46 years old ,now residing at Chennai , I have one elder brother and two younger brothers ,when my child hood (one and half year) my grand father Mr.K.Thangavel udayar have written a settlement on 1968 in my elder brother name Mr.P.Palanimuthu (when he was 6 years old )for our ancestral property ,the property was not earned by him ,it is coming hereditarily ,after me there are two children born to my father and he changed the patta in his name only on 2006 ,now my elder brother told As our grand father have written a settlement in his name only ,he can not give any share to us ,but I could understand the ancestral property cannot conveyed by means of settlement deed and all the sons are equally entitled for share in the property, so I filed the case at viruthachalam court ,the property worth will be Rs.50 lakhs, so I need a sound talented advocate to run this case at viruthachalam court ,the problem is now I am not able give any fees for the advocates ,if any advocate come forward to run this case, after winning the case ,we are ready to give 10% from the property ,if any body interested pl contact
p.sundararajan
mobile-9150300506
email-psundar3467@yahoo.com
Aftab Shaikh
28 September 2012 at 15:40
Can the cooperative housing society of the complex ask the advocate to remove the name plate put on his window which is facing the inside of the society complex as the society had asked the other members to remove their boards for e.g beauty classes etc as it was not looking look in the complex, they all have complied except for the advocate.
Can the society take any action if he doesnot remove the board/Name plate from his window.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Can trial court (like district and session court) can recall /quash/review/ it own erroneous order
Respected Experts,
Facts of the case is that District and Session Court passed a order which is erroneous.Later occasion the aggrieved party find out a Supreme Court ruling which consonance that, that order was erroneous but at the time when the judgment was found the limitation period already over.
So, what is the best possible remedies in above fact and circumstances?
Do District and Session Court has power to recall and review it erroneous order after the period of limitation period ??
Please give guidance with specifying the relevant law or High Court and Supreme Court ruling.