K V RAMA MOHAN RAO
27 August 2013 at 09:06
My daughter has appeared the exams conducted during June 13 by IGNOU. Application for Exam was submitted in March 13 which was accepted by IGNOU and later on issued Hall Ticket. After attending all exams they have not declared the result with a comment " you are not eligible for this session".
On approaching the Higher authorities they say it is the student's responsibility to check the eligibility and IGNOU is not responsible and they have not replied to any of our letters.
Pl advise.
Chetan Shenoy
27 August 2013 at 05:05
Hi,
I am looking for a sample loan agreement for a personal loan given by me to a friend. Can someone please send me a draft copy or advise where can I get one?
Thanks
shree sharma
26 August 2013 at 23:33
what share a daughter gets .
if a hindu dies before 2004 leaving ancestral property of his grandfather and property was not divided till ammendment of 2005
the property is now to be divided among 4 daughters and 1 son land is 130 acre in MP.
father died in 1967.mother died in 2010
alive heirs are 4 daughters and 1 son.
land is ancestral.no division took place before today among heirs .all heirs have their name on revenue records.
son born in 1940.
daughters born in 1955 1958 1959 1961.
(a) by birth become a coparcener in her own right in the same manner as the son; (b) have the same rights in the coparcenary property as she would have had if she had been a son; (c) be subject to the same liabilities in respect of the said coparcenary property as that of a son, and any reference to a Hindu Mitakshara coparcener shall be deemed to include a reference to a daughter of a coparcener: Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall affect or invalidate any disposition or alienation including any partition or testamentary disposition of property which had taken place before the 20th day of December, 2004.
what does it mean.
though heirs born before act but partion is to be made now?
plz help
Mohit Singh
26 August 2013 at 21:15
I would Like to know the process of obtaining the Arms License under Gurgaon Jurisdiction adn what Lawyer can Help me with the Documentation etc.
Rushikesh Deshpande
26 August 2013 at 18:02
suit is filed being aggrieved by judgment and order of tahasildar notice u/s 80 C.P.C is compulsory or not?
arvind
26 August 2013 at 17:51
dear i sir
i was arrested in june 2011 for a cheating case but it was a false case. now i am dischaged by the magistrate court. on my arrested newpaper company gave a wrong information about me to public. since i was discharged on august 2013 23 i can i fill a civil damage defamation case. not criminal defamation since i was dischaged recently so i have one year time after discharges. please tell me what to do to take compensation from the newpaper ageny for spoiling my name
and i want advocate in bangalore karnataka
shree sharma
26 August 2013 at 12:18
if a hindu dies before 2004 leaving ancestral property of his grandfather and property was not divided till ammendment of 2005
the property is now to be divided among 4 daughters and 1 son land is 130 acre in MP.
father died in 1967.mother died in 2010
alive heirs are 4 daughters and 1 son.
land is ancestral.no division took place before today among heirs .all heirs have their name on revenue records.
son born in 1940.
daughters born in 1955 1958 1959 1961.
(a) by birth become a coparcener in her own right in the same manner as the son; (b) have the same rights in the coparcenary property as she would have had if she had been a son; (c) be subject to the same liabilities in respect of the said coparcenary property as that of a son, and any reference to a Hindu Mitakshara coparcener shall be deemed to include a reference to a daughter of a coparcener: Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall affect or invalidate any disposition or alienation including any partition or testamentary disposition of property which had taken place before the 20th day of December, 2004.
what does it mean.
though heirs born before act but partion is to be made now?
plz help
SANDEEP KUMAR
26 August 2013 at 11:48
A case was filed in 2011. It has been fixed for Plaintiff's evidence now. For the purpose of evidence is it necessary to restrict to the position mentioned in the plaint in 2011 or current position can also be added in the evidence to be submitted by affidavit.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Suit for partition..
Respected Members!
My client was taken in adoption when he was six months baby in the year 1980. The giving and taking of adoprion was taken palce according to the caste and coustom prevalining in their community. Dispite of all cermonies, no document in respct of adoption was reduced in to writing. My client was brought up with his adoptive parents and continued as the son of his adoptive parents in the school, college, pass-port, voter-list, driving licence and other concerned records. Sub sequently the adoptive father of my cleint died leaving his wife and my clinet as his first calss legal heirs to his movable and movable properties. Now the adoptive mother of my client denying the share in the properties left by the deceased adoptive father of my clinet. I have filed a suit for partiton against the adoptive mother. The Court has taken an objection to file the deed of adoption if any, even after filing the above stated docuemtns to tshow that my cleint is adopted son. In fact no such deed was reduced in to writing except the performing of cermonies at the time of adoption of my client in the yea 1980. Is it mandatory to get the adoption in to writing/registered or is it optional ? How can I resubmit the suit satisfying the court or complying the objection taken by the court.
Thank you one and all!