LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Vaseem Mustafa   23 October 2013 at 19:40

Child custody

Sir,
This in Continuation to my Previous Query were in i was advised to wait till next hearing the previous Query was
"On 02-09-2013 the Hon'ble Court directed the advocate of my opposite party to get my baby along with the lady on 13-09-2013 so that the father can see her daughter.On 13-09-2013,neither the lady attended the court nor brought my daughter to the court & 13-09-2013 hearing, the advocate of 2nd party said he will definitely get the baby on next hearing which was on 01-10-2013,but yesterday the situation was no more different neither the lady nor baby came to court.They Advocate of 2nd party submitted that Mamaji of the lady has expired few days back,That is true the Mamaji of lady expired some 20 days back.I feel they are simply playing delay tactics ,please advise what to do."
Now The case was for hearing on 21-10-2013,the same history repeated,the Junior Counsel of my opposite party attended,but my Counsel requested the Judge to send a warrant through the Concerned Police Station, but Judge told the Junior Counsel to get your senior & kept the case pending.My counsel then went in other Court to attended his other cases,In the mean while I saw senior Counsel of my opposite party coming out of Judge chamber during the break time & when i enquired from the concerned clerk he said he was discussing the case & in next hearing they will get the baby & gave me next date after 10 days.I told my counsel same he told me dont worry they have get the baby.I donot know what Judge & the senior Counsel of Opposite party discussed in the chamber of Judge & what has been written on the file.
So please share your experience what they will do on next date & what is advise for me.

mahmood mithani   23 October 2013 at 17:33

About joint secretary in regd.housing society

Pls advice if there can be joint secretary in a housing society? pls also suggest can he be a one of signatory on the cheques to be issued?

tnx

adv.durgadas k.kulkarni   23 October 2013 at 15:27

Alienation of interest

Father having a big plot,but he doesn't allow his only one son to develop it.Son wants to alienate it to developer.
Can son sale his share without the consent of his father as per Hindu Law?

adv.durgadas k.kulkarni   23 October 2013 at 15:22

Alienation of interest

Father having a big plot,but he doesn't allow his only one son to develop it.Son wants to alienate it to developer.
Can son sale his share without the consent of his father as per Hindu Law?

S. Fernandes   23 October 2013 at 13:55

application o21 r58

Dear Mr Raj Kumar, Thank you and all others for the kind assitance. This is the time line in the matter: Dec 09: I filled suit for money recovery,against partnership firm of four parners,along with an application under O39 for temp injunction to restraint the defendants from alianating their partnership property being a factory premise,wich is the only asset available to settle m y dues. Feb 10: During the subsistance of the suit and injunction proceedings the defendants through a POA on behalf of Partners sold the said factory premises to third party. Third Party mordgages the said factory premise to Bank. April 10: Court passes order of injunction as prayed, in my favour. Oct 10: Suit decreed as prayed, in my favour. July 12: I file in capacity now of DH, Execution proceedings. Aug 13: I attach the factory property. The said Third Party files objections under R58 of O21 praying that attachment be lifted as the said factory premises have been purchased by him prior to the decree being passed, and further disclosed that the said factory premises are also mortgaged to the bank all in Feb'10. Bank (mortgagee) has not appeared to date, even though third party(mortgager)has filled objections filled objections. Partnership Firm still subsists. No Business being carriedout as business premises, being the said Factory premises is sold to said Third Party. Questions: 1- Can Partnership Property be sold even though the Partnership is not desolved. The principal business of the Partnership was the manufacture and sale of Ice Creams. 2 - Can Partnership during the subsistance of the partnership be sold through a POA. Reference sec 19, 20 & 22 of Partnership act 192. 3 - Is this a lis pendant sale. 4- Can the bank(mortgagee) who has not reponded to the atachment be ignored.

saurav   23 October 2013 at 13:34

Amendment application

whether second amendment application is maintainable when the previous is dismissed on ground that it is not filed as per procedure i.e. non filing of amended plaint with the application. any citation...

Member (Account Deleted)   23 October 2013 at 13:29

Land money issue

sir, my friend's wife sold her land 6 years before when she was 18 and its money of 10 lakhs was
given to her mother in her bank account. after their marriage her mother tells she wont give the money to her back again.her mother is a housewife,younger brother is just 17 yrs, no there is no way of income to that family.ration card is issued BPL.her father expired 14 yrs ago. and no one in home. is there any chance for return of money?

sandeep pilania   23 October 2013 at 12:24

Private school

I want to know that if any body can find any information about school through RTI in a private cbse recognised school in haryana

vijay kumar   23 October 2013 at 11:54

Agreement cancel of land

I am Vijay kumar,i have sinned an agreement to sell my land and get advance 150000Rs.Now my family and brother don't want to sell bcz we r combind family.and that property 4 kata and we r 4 brother,so all r in that property.and I make agreement of 1 kata but now I want to cancel that agreement and ready to return his money,so pla help me how is it possible to cancel that agreement by court.

DS REDDY   23 October 2013 at 10:56

Estate abolition 1947

Sir/Madam,
We are the usufractury mortgage with all the rights of inamestate wef 1924 till abolition,having original tax(kist)reciepts from 1939,registered lease of palm orchids in the estate between 1944 to 47(3yrs)by the morugee(which establishes ther were no ryots between 1944 to till abolished. As per suomotu inquiry for compensation notices were served to mortgee of estate ,partial compensation paid.Presently pattas were granted on the basis of patta and revenue tax reciepts (kist) given by the Inamdar who had no rights (administrative)at thet time of issue) dtd after 1939(This indicates pattas were obtained with falsified documents).presently the estate lands were under the ocupation pattadars. what are our rights over the land,