T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
02 November 2013 at 12:28
Sir/Madam,
Can any one clarify the following:
Under the Hindu Succession (Amendment)Act 2005 (39of 2005);
1) A women who was married before commencement of the amended act is a coparcener and entitled to her share in the ancestral properties?;
2) Are the women who are married before the commencement of this amended act become a part of the Hindu Undivided Family property or whether they are members of the joint Hindu family?
3) If not what is their status as per the amended law?
4) Whether the said amendment was given retrospective effect?
jagjit singh
02 November 2013 at 10:48
SIR,
I GOT MARRIED TO A LADY ON GURUDWARA AFTER THAT MY BROTHER IN LAW HAS TAKEN MY SIGNATURE ON BLANK MARRIAGE REGISTRATION FORM FOR REGISTRATION. AFTER ONE WEEK I HAVE GONE FOR REGISTRATION WHERE THEY SHOWN ME THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE OF GURUDWARA, AND AFTER THAT I HAVE COMPLETED THE OTHER FORMALITY OF REGISTRATION. RECENTLY I HAVE COME TO KNOW THAT MY IN-LAWS HAVE GOT REGISTERED MY MARRIAGE BY SHOWING THAT MARRIAGE WAS SOLEMNIZED AT SOME TEMPLE IN PLACE OF GURUDWARA. ON ESQUIRING FROM REGISTRATION OFFICE I HAVE COME TO KNOW THAT IN THERE RECORD ONE GOZTED OFFICER GIVEN THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE AND ONE PUJARI HAS SIGNED ON MY MARRIAGE REGISTRATION FORM. BUT I HAVE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE FROM GURUDWARA AND 150 PHOTOGRAPHS OF MARRIAGE WHICH SOLEMNIZED AT GURUDWARA. WHAT I CAN DO TO CANCEL THAT REGISTRATION. I HAVE ALREADY INFORMED THE FACTS TO REGISTRATION AUTHORITY. CAN I FILE THE CASE AGAINST MY IN LAW AND THE OFFICER WHO HAS GIVEN THE FALSE CERTIFICATE OF MARRIAGE. KINDLY LET ME KNOW.
jatin sharma
02 November 2013 at 10:17
hi,
In MACT case the insurance investigator report is admissible or not in court.
fact of the case, petitioner is husband of deceased and i cross examine him after that case fixed for RW but the insurance investigator send me verbal report which is mention that the petitioner is done second marriage. so can I give application to court for re-cross examination the petitioner and what is the admissibility of investigator verbal report in court
thanks
basavaraj shiromani
02 November 2013 at 08:31
Respected Experts, I had asked about changing the name of plaintiff in a WS filed by the defendants ? What action can be taken against the defendant for altering the name of plaintiff in his Ws cause title without leave of the court ? Is it attracts order 1 rule 10(2) of cpc ? possibility of filing rejoinder by the plaintiff in this connection. Are there any rulings with regard to altering the the name of plaintiff in his ws is not permissible ?
Khaleel Ahmed Mohammed
01 November 2013 at 18:04
ATTENTION PLOT OWNERS OF S.NO.124 GOPANPALLY VILLAGE OF SERILINGAPALLY MANDAL RANGA REDDY DISTRICT OF WHO HAS LOST THEIR PLOTS UNDER SEZ SCHEME ARE ELIGIBLE FOR COMPENSATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013. THEY REQUIRE TO FILE DECLARATION OF TITLE AND RECOVERY OF POSSESSION SUIT BEFORE CIVIL COURT RANGA REDDY DISTRICT COURTS.LIMITATION PERIOD IS 12 YEARS SINCE THE DATE OF POSSESSION LOST.FOR MORE DETAILS CONTACT
MOHAMMAD KHALEEL AHMED , ADVOCATE A.P. HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD.
CELL NO. 9848574812
MSC Shekar
01 November 2013 at 17:00
In a Civil Suit (Respondents / Defendents both private parties); Document Gift Deed; Suit is for partition of properties; Registration Department Deposed as witness validating the Gift Deed.
The suit was decreed
After 30 years it was found that there are no link Document in the Gift Deed.
A 340 CrPc Petition was filed against the Registration Department by the Defendant in the said suit. The Registration Department failed to appear and was set exparte. It was brought to the notice of the court that the said Document Gift Deed does not contain link documents; YET THE COURT DISMISSED THE PETITION.
Appeal was prefered in Chief Judge court on this 340 Crpc Petition; Again The Registration Department was set exparte.
My query is why the Court is not taking the validation of the Gift Deed inspite of clear evidence and acceptence by the Registration Department?
Thanks in advance.
mosheerul haque
01 November 2013 at 16:27
AFTER how many days of lodging an FIR under section 279, 337, 338 (IPC), 3/181, 5/180 & 146/196 (MVA), the claim case can be filed ??
MSC Shekar
01 November 2013 at 15:46
Does the All India Reporter of any particular year of any State High Court contain all the cases of that particular year or only noteable or important judgements in all categories like WP, CRP etc. ?
Actually I am looking for a very old case of the year 1950. In a High Court I have seen a Brown Book series with the year of that State High Court label. Will this series have the particular case I am looking for ?
Thanks in advance
raju
01 November 2013 at 13:03
i d.raju submit that my father has taken a personal loan amount of 130000 in 2004 from canara bak.with the agreement of month ly installment of 3116Rs..but he failed to repay the amount..summons issued to him.but he retired from the servive in 2007..and expired in 2008...after we got so many notices from the court.but we did not accepted any summon..day before we got another summon for the settlement of amount 175000 with the rate of intrest 10.90 for quarterly for the said above amount from 2005..they have issued a summon under section 7 Rule 1 R/w sec 26 C.P.C``WHAT DO U advice for the further process.do they give any attachment for my mother pension in these cases..how should i approach the c court
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Arbitration matter
Hi Experts,
in an arbitration tribunal we have filed a claim which is in limitation period. Respondent filed a counter claim to it. we found that for that counterclaim limitation period of 3 years was over by the day of filing of counterclaim. Can we take that plea or not? Respondent argues that as the counterclaim is part of main claim and the main claim is within limitation period. Hence his contention for counterclaim is maintainable though it crossed limitation period of 3 years. Is it true in the eye of law ? or any scope for me to face him.. Please answer me...