malikny
24 June 2015 at 19:59
TP For Rejection u/r 435(Year 2013)
Jaya Prasad Balla
24 June 2015 at 10:24
My father sold a bit of land to our neighbors. In old documents a cart track was mentioned from one survey no to another. But the width was not mentioned. In surveyer FMB the existence of cart track was not mentioned. What is the minimum width of cart track as per law? Please clarify me.
Khaleel Ahmed Mohammed
21 June 2015 at 22:04
Wanted Retainer Advocates for Delhi-Mumbai-Bangaluru @ assignment basis. Interested may submit their updated CVs careers@mkatruelaw.com
Website: www.mkatruelaw.com
ashishdhamecha
20 June 2015 at 11:08
i suit an application for the tax appeal..naw in which proviso to add municipale as a respondent..
rajan chopra
19 June 2015 at 16:55
Sir in a suit for recovery filed by me the defendant filed affidavit in his defence and was cross examined by my counsel.In answer to a question the defendant denied signatures on w.s and vakalatnama also besides other documents such as pronote,stamp paper and admitted signatures on affidavit and summon only.The judge after hearing defendant's denial of signatures on w.s and vakalatnama asked defence counsel wheather the defendant has signed or not on these two documents and was answered in affirmative.The judge said that it seems forgery is being committed either by defendant or counsel and now case is at argument stage.what can be or should be efforts by me further for the sake of my interest?
narendra
18 June 2015 at 21:05
Sir, I have question regarding property dividation. My maternal grandpa expired on 24.4.2011. The land of 39 acres was on his name and his unmarried blind brothers name togetherly. Grandpa has 2 son and 4 daughters (all are married). Dividation of property was stopped in between in his present in 2008 legally. only collectors order of reservation of land is done. At that time nothing was given to daughters. But my question is ...whether now all girls (married before 1993) are having equal rights in property? Kindly help.
saravanakumar
18 June 2015 at 14:37
Dear Experts,
I would like to submit a civil dispute case before you for the advice from you to save the client (plaintiff).
1. The disputed property is ancestor property. It has two legal heirs as brother and sister. Male heir was passed and he has three sons. The three sons and his aunty (own sister of his father) had jointly borrowed the mortgage loan from co – operative society bank. Hence, the aunty was default to repay the share of his loan amount.
2. So, the three sons decided to close the mortgage loan from bank and sale the property. Now, the defendants (three sons) approached to my client (plaintiff) to purchase the entire property. My client gave the money for defendants to close the mortgage loan. As per deal, the three defendants and his aunty closed the mortgage loan from bank and executed the registered sale agreement deed for entire property by three defendants except his aunty to my client on 21.07.2005.
3. My client requested to execute the sale deed from defendants but they deliberately refused. In this, my client filed the Specific Performance Suit on court, mean time my client and defendant compromised and received balance consideration by the defendants. The court had passed the decree in favour of my client on 18-08-2009. Court had given two months time to defendants for executed sale deed in favour of my client.
4. However, the case had been pending, the aunty (sister of defendant father) 3 legal heirs sold the half of property on 9.7.2008 to female third party and deliberately hided the court decree and sale agreement for the property to third parties (third parties are husband and wife and relations to all the defendants). And another half of the property was sold on 03.09.2009 by three defendants same as above way to male third party intend to cheat my client.
5. E.P filed by us. Defendants made fake memo for compromise and used fake sign as my client signature and submitted it on court. But the court was not recorded that memo.
In this situation, the third parties now filed the petition under section 47 CPC. I humbly request you to clarify the following questions.
1. Is 47 CPC is maintainable in this circumstance or not?
2. defendant parties suit filing time had already expired, hence the 47 CPC can allow or not.
3. Is there any possibility to execute the sale deed as per court order to my client? If yes, kindly explain.
4. Requests - Citation regard this.
Thanks with,
SARAVANAKUMAR.S
Harshala
08 June 2015 at 15:25
my father has a 5 sibling and they were living together in the municipal chawl apartment in dadar till the death of my grand father, who was having tenancy rights on his name. out of 5 siblings 2 are sisters who left that apartment after their marriage. after his death, in 1991 my father has moved out from that place and took other rental apartment nearby his office. The tenancy has not been transferred from the name of my grand father to any of its legal heir. while moving out of that place, my uncles assured my father, that his right in that place will remain unaffected. however, as the said place has gone under redevelopment scheme (not under SRA act), they refused to give anything to my father as they were having uninterrupted possession of rental premises. so my question is that, whether they can claim adverse possession under a purview of the said facts or we can claim our part in the said property under the provision of tenancy act.
Advocate.S.A.Siddiq
18 May 2015 at 09:45
Guardianship order obtained by fraud and concealed - after 12 years respondent of GWOP filed section 5 petition with setaside petition
In sec.5 petition - RW1 & RW2 examined and cross examined- now respondent side filing IA petition u/s 151cpc for examine the junior bailiff of the court -
Without allowing the Sec.5 petition , Is this proceeding is correct ?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Electric cable from our land
Dear Sirs,
We have our house constructed on plot of land in Grampanchayat limits in Maharashtra, Pune. We have left three foot land behind our building. The people of adjoining building have laid electric cable from our 3 foot vacant land as above without our consent.
Can they do so? If not, what is the remedy available to us.?
Kindly advise.