sezean
08 September 2017 at 15:26
one lady have 6000 sq.f land. she made a will to share the total property to her 6 sons, after her death the 5th son get 1000 sq.f land property of his share. he is Hindu religion. then after one week he died. wife (christian) and one minor daughter, aged 2 years as his legal heirs. wife want to sell her husband's 1000 sq.f share property. whats the sections and act to file the suit? whats the reason i mentioned to pray the court?
gopal
08 September 2017 at 14:24
Respected Experts,
I have seen one query regarding National High ways Act one querist GOPAL PALOD asked the query on 21 Jan 2012 the query is
"My land measuring 2.1 acres is going to be aquired by NHAI for four laning of national highway no. 6. My land is sorrounded by warehouses & transport & industrial units. The market value of my piece of land is approx 1 crore. I am not aware as to how much amount i will receive from NHAI. Please give me expert advise so as to receive rupees 1 Cr from NHAI against the compesation of land owned by me "
For this query the Expert Mr Ajay Sethi sir has replied that
" The Act covers only legal title holders and provides for: (i) market value of the land; (ii) a solatium of 30% on the market value for compulsory acquisition; (iii) additional amount for trees, crops, houses or other immovable properties; (iv) damage due to severing of land, residence, place of business; (v) compensation to bargadar (sharecroppers) for loss of earning; and (vi) an interest of 12% on the market value from the date of notification to award."
I humbly request the experts kindly provide the solution and guidance :
my agricultural land and so many persons agricultural lands were acquired by the NHAI for NH205 Project. The Spl District Revenue Officer /Land Acauisition Officer awarded only the market value as per the National Highways Act . When we ask about solatium and 12% interest on market value, the LAO and Project Director of NH-205 project they were told that there is no provision in National Highwasy act to give solatium and 12% market value to the land owners under the sec 3(j) . They also told that those land which was acquired by the Land acquisition act ,they only eligible to get solatium and 12% market value but ours acquired under national Highways act so they did not provide the solatium and 12% interest on market value.
I and the other land owners are approached the local lawyers in this regard they also telling the same as like the LAO. In this situtation I have seen Mr Ajay Sethi sir's reply ,
so i would like to get guidance in this regard.
Respected Sirs
if possible kindly provide the Supreme Court Judgment on this type of case if any available ,it will be helpful to me and other agricultural land owners who were lost their agricultural land in this project.
Do we have entitled to get solatium and 12% market value.
I am not only asking for me also asking for so many land owners who lost their land in the NH project.
Sir kindly provide the guidance in this regard.
Thanks and regards in advance
nandagopal
Anonymous
08 September 2017 at 11:08
sir ,
my name is aarti and i want to ask you that i have a civil case of combine aagan half is my and other half is of other. on the eve of bakrid they construct bathroom on my portion. because they are bjp neeta ,police did not help me to stop the construction help me . if possible give me contact no on my email.
davy
07 September 2017 at 19:26
Has Supreme Court recently passed Judgment that SC BC category cannot claim Seat of General Category even if they secure more marks than cutoff marks of General Category?
I am Concerened bcz I got 148 Rank in Junior Engineer Job and no. of general category seats are 124 but there are 37 SC/BC students shown in the List above me if they Get job in category then I will get Job orelse it is difficult if they take general seat
harjinder
07 September 2017 at 19:01
Fighting a property case for last 15years.In 2015 Ex-parte judgement was pronounced in our favour. Section 5 was filed by the other party in 2017.The case was transfered to District Judge.All the relevant documents were produced. The other party counsellor is not ready to face the argument and unnecessary prolonging the case. Court is also granting him time and dates of his choice. Kindly advice how can I process my case sooner. I am facing a lot of problems since I have a transferable job.
davy
07 September 2017 at 16:48
Has Supreme Court recently passed Judgment that SC BC category cannot claim Seat of General Category even if they secure more marks than cutoff marks of General Category?
ANILKUMAR
07 September 2017 at 15:46
we are 70 familys people purchased & residing with houses since 70 years ,we dont have a registration for my house lands at the time of past 70 years ago we dont have registration system,thats why we dont have a registration? actually pattadar died nearly 60 ago he dont have children and family.
now a days some body created a fake successor letter who is pattadar brother son he applied for virsat he got pattadar passbook and Title deed from revenue depatment,now he is come to court (joint colletor)he is having rights to sell all these lands,he is fighting for
since 70 years and above we are purchased and enjoying these lands we are having house tax bill,tap bills,electricity bill,some of persons having rhytu passbook issued by thasildar .
in revunue record we dont have a name in pattadar colum(who is died 60 years ago pattadar his name is continuing) we a having a colum enjoyment colum since 50 years above
this is gone for judgment to RDO court RDO is enquired all the details about lands is house site area, he cancelled which is given virasat pattadar passbook and title deed
he orderd issued seize pattadar passbook and Title deed from fake successor.
now the fake successor (pettissioner) went for Joint colletor for Judgment
who will have rights for lands(houses residing area of seventy families)?
we (Respondents) Seventy families having following documents
1.pahani copies since 1950-to -2017 ( we are in enjoyment colum)
2.some of having rhytu passbooks issued by thasildar
3.electricity issued copy since 30 years ,bills
4.house tax bills since 20-30 years
5.we are in present position in land (having houses and enjoying)
6.we are having proof for fake sucessor letter ( who is the proof of signed on fake sucessor letter is signature is wrong and at the time he is having only 14 years as per aadhar card ex:created letter at the time of 1953 who is singed as guaranteer is born on 1939 )
pettisioner having proofs:
1.some of our 2 familys are registered with pettisioner at the time he doest have a name in pattadar
2.he is having a proof after getting a passbook one member is registered with petitioner
3.iam is the respondent (iam not having name in colum enjoyment, my father is alive he is having a name in enjoyment colum in revenue records)
doubts
1can i eligile for petision for this issue?iam not having name in enjoyment colum my fathes is having name in enjoyment colum
2.iam is the petisior is going on this issue
•
•
•
•
NAGARAJ
07 September 2017 at 10:18
Hi sir I HV instituted a partition suit in the year of 2006.in os suit ,family tree and plaintiff name mentioned as muniraju and my all identity proofs mentioned as nagaraju.now I am 80 years old .after 11 yrs of d suit now stage s addl issues.can I file amendment application to add my alias name nagaraju.relationship admitted by defendants. Any suggestions or citations to lead my case is very helpful sir
Hariharapandian
06 September 2017 at 22:24
1)I have booked ticket in private travels through red bus app and also I got ticket for the same.
2)on the journey date,I recieved the Call from travels that bus will be come with delay of two hours
3)But even after the time of 3 1/2 hours the bus did not come.I had called to them but they did not attend my call.I had really troubled with my old-age parents on that mid night time
4)so now I prefer to lodge a compliant to consumer forum.
5)what is the amount of court fees that I have to pay.
6)what is the jurisdiction for losing compliant
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Regarding Full Pay
sir Is There any judgement related that During 2 years of Probabation Period, govt employee Should be paid Full Pay. currently state Govt. is just giving Basic Pay i.e. 10300