Tarun Kumar Tomar
04 November 2017 at 17:28
When we file case under section 19(1) of HAMA then burden of proving that the property which father-in-law is in possession is not ancestral property.
Manish Jain
04 November 2017 at 15:04
Hi..
how to waive off court have to coast me on not replying the main petition after my 7/14 application is dismissed. my self contest the my case In person. opposite party was take 8 adjournment after my 7/14 application. but after dismiss my application on very next date i demand adjournment to reply the petition court have to cost me.
Now want to suggestion to all of you in which Act or rule n order i can apply for a application for waive of this cost.
Thanx
Quadir
04 November 2017 at 07:56
Perhaps my query involves a question of law. It is about a document being void / voidable, limitation attached to it and court fees for attacking this type of document.
I have a perpetual lessee under a registered lease deed executed between my late father and him. A nominal yearly rent is fixed in the lease deed, which tenant/lessee is supposed to pay annually, failing which landlord (before my father, now me) shall have the right to re-enter the property leased.
Concealing this fact, recently the lessee SOLD the property to someone through a registered sale deed, showing himself as absolute OWNER of the property and gave away the possession to the purchaser.
Now questions are:
1. Is this sale deed a void or voidable document?
2. If it is a void document, still am I bound to take action against it within the limitation period of three years from its execution?
3. If it is void, then do void documents have limitations?
4. Do I have to get it cancelled and declared it as null & void with a prayer of getting the possession (as a consequential relief) ? If so, do I have to pay court fees ad-valorem?
5. Now my property is in the hands of a stranger and in order to get it back i have to pay court fees on the market value of the property, which doesn't really make sense. So what remedy do I have now?
( I am aware of SC Judgements- Shailendra Bhardwaj & Ors vs Chandra Pal (2013) 1 SCC 579 & Suhrid Singh vs Randhir Singh , AIR 2010 SC 2807. But they do not help in my case.)
Your answers would be much appreciated, thank you.
- Quadir
HABIB
02 November 2017 at 22:09
Plz explain me experts advocate.. Difference between petitioner, prosecution, plaintiff, responded, prosecutor, claimant in civil codes related to land dispute...
Anonymous
02 November 2017 at 15:25
Hi
I had a sexual relationship with one of my colleague. My girl friend came to know about it and we had a break up. I had clearly told her that I had affiar with that colleague only.
Now my ex gf is reaching out to my other female colleagues and asking them if I had any relationship with them. This is causing problems for me at work. I am not able to work with any of my female colleagues.
Can this be considered as defamation? Can I sue her in this case?
SP Verma
02 November 2017 at 15:21
Respected Sir, The applicatioin of plaintiff for permanent injunction under O39 R1&2 was rejected as the incredients of three aspects i.e.prima facie, balance of convenience and irreparable loss were not found in his favour. Simulataneously, the counter claim of defendant for temporary injunction was also rejected by the same court on the plea that no permanent injunction was prayed for though the defendnat has good title in his favour. Kindly suggest me whether I can submit now the application for permanent injunction against plaintiff. If so under which sections please.
I shall be highly grateful for your kind advice.
Thanks and regards,
SP Verma
N. SENTHIL KUMAR
02 November 2017 at 09:36
Respected Sir(s),
I served in central paramilitary force with 09 years and 09 months complete service and further joined in PSU with Technical resignation. I made so many correspondence for granting of pension to service rendered in central paramilitary but they did not released pensionary benefits till date. Please suggest for availing pensionary benefits.
priyanka
01 November 2017 at 21:44
Hello sir, i am residing in rohini sec 1, where the houses are made on the basis of pocket system. In our pocket, one shopkeeper has encroached the road by stall of momos. My problem is that my car is parked in front of said shop in the night because of space problem in pockets to park our cars in front of our houses. In this condition, what should we do. Any legel remedy is available by law to stop encroachment.
jamil
01 November 2017 at 17:50
two persons make fraud in business. On demand one person gave cheque of the due amount. The same are bounced. I lodged FIR against the both accused. I filed summary suit in the court and got decree. Defendant who gave cheques is absconder since long.
The second accused arrested by police. After trial when case became on final argument, accused offered the complainant to compromise. accused executed promissory note. Now he is not paying the amount. Can I file the summery suit against him.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
As per which law/act can an incharge court pass an order?
Hi!
I had filed an application to the 1st munsif madhubani seeking an ex-parte injunction (order 39 rule 3a) order aginst mukhiya restraining him from carrying our any kind of financial and non financial activity, as he witheld his criminal past and is a government servant. Both these details he witheld from his application filed to contest the application. This is since february 2017 onwards. Case status is admitted notice is served but notice hasn't been received by the party nor has it made any appearance
I filed an application to the munsif who did not pass any order, now the munsif has been transferred, and their is an incharge court which holds all the court records.
I would be filing a fresh application for ex-parte injunction to the incharge court as original application suffers demerit. Lawyers say that incharge court cannot pass any order and i have to wait till the next munsif arrives. So I cannot wait for 5 years for the new munsif to appear.
Now I want the incharge court to pass the ex-parte injunction order, can the incharge court pass the order as my case has merit, but the question is under which law / act is the incharge court authorised to pass such an order.
Please help! If any lawyer from patna or delhi would like to file the suit in Patna high court and obtain the ex-parte injunction order simulatneusly while the suit is pending in madhubani as multiplicity of proceedings does not apply to injunction, are openly welcome.