GANGO PADHYAYA
07 November 2017 at 12:30
Sir
If a GPA executor dies , then the GPA holder terminates is happen
In this i need a citation in support of GPA not valid after death of executor
Regards
KALU RAM GURJAR
07 November 2017 at 10:03
Sir I have convicted ipc 283 pending case in court I eligible in rajasthan government service my waiting list selection please clarify my problem
M Satyanarayana
06 November 2017 at 11:31
Sir,
I filed along with my father partition suit against my sister. My partition suit was allowed and we got 1/3rd share each. My sister appealed in Supreme Court which was dismissed. Against she went for Revision in the appellate court in Supreme Court. The partition suit is closed.
After Supreme court dismissal of my sister's appeal in the Supreme court I issued Public Notice in bilingual editions warning about my sister's fradulent dealing and creating false documents.
Unfortunately my sister created relinquishment deeds while filing final decree proceedings claiming she has discharged and satisfied the decree hence final decree be passed in favour of her only. I opposed and denied any such arrangement between myself, father and my sister. Every criminal makes a mistake. My sister mentioned the execution of document after dismissal of SLP and left to mention she has gone for review also. The time gap between SLP dismissal date 12-07-2010 and Review Petition date 15-12-2010 which is about 5 months. My sister has filed review petition after publication of the public notice.dated 20-07-2010 and alleged execution date 27-12-2010. The document shows execution is after dismissal of SLP.
The public notice in the newspaper about fradulent dealings by my sister will valid to prove the alleged execution of the document. There is long gap between my Sister's SLP and again her Review Petition. Please do inform whether such fradulent document will hold good.
Thanking you
M.SATYANARAYANA
Anonymous
05 November 2017 at 22:15
My wife has a property in her name, which came to her by way of gift from her mother. Now she want to gift that property to minor son of his brother. Whether she can do so or not? If she can do so, what are the procedures to be followed by her?.
J. Raj george
05 November 2017 at 22:13
Sir, the advocate commissioner report has been scrapped by sub judge in first appeal for reason that the suit property was measured by a sale deed marked as plaintiff side document 1 given by plaintiff lawyer during commissioner,s measurement.whether is it not proper to give a marked document to commissioner by plaintiff lawyer.
danappa
05 November 2017 at 22:11
My wife had a property in her name, which came to her by way of gift from her mother. Now she want to gift that property to minor son of his brother. Whether she can do so or not? If yes, what are the procedures to be followed by her?.
vipul shah
05 November 2017 at 20:46
I have bought land before 3 years. Sale deed already made.i want to build sports complex on it but i have Fear that behind my land one person will take stay as he told me that" my bypass road is through your Land". I have official sale deed but if he takes stay in the court of law I will have to face litigation unnecessarily.Also will take too much time in litigation. can i appoint court commission for the same? Is there any other options? Kindly advise for the same.
Prithvi
05 November 2017 at 14:19
Hello,
My apartment's name is SLV UNIWORTH CLASSIC @ HBR layout and we have already made individual metering system all the 14 existing Apartments because 4 years back the Builder used to live in the Penthouse which is one of the 14 apartments and a lot of water was being wasted and to control that we made the water metering system.
The association took a decision without the consent of the members or the residents living living in the apartment which otherwise is done on all the previous occasions when a decision is taken.
Even after we have metres in place and we have been paying as per the consumption of water they are trying to put a surcharge or additional cost of pumping by deciding a cap off number of liters.
is it fare to allocate 14500 liters per month for a family 1 and a family of 6?
My point is changing extra over the metered usage is Illegal and threatening the tenants and forcably making them pay is Illegal.
Please share expert advice as I feel this is Illegal.
House no no of ppl
001. 3
002. 3
003 3
101. 2
102. 6
103. 3
201. 5
202. 6
203. 4
301. 4
302. 4
303. 1
401. 5
402. 5
Thanks
Prithvi
Harekrishna D C
05 November 2017 at 14:18
Hi!
I had filed an application to the 1st munsif madhubani seeking an ex-parte injunction (order 39 rule 3a) order aginst mukhiya restraining him from carrying our any kind of financial and non financial activity, as he witheld his criminal past and is a government servant. Both these details he witheld from his application filed to contest the application. This is since february 2017 onwards. Case status is admitted notice is served but notice hasn't been received by the party nor has it made any appearance
I filed an application to the munsif who did not pass any order, now the munsif has been transferred, and their is an incharge court which holds all the court records.
I would be filing a fresh application for ex-parte injunction to the incharge court as original application suffers demerit. Lawyers say that incharge court cannot pass any order and i have to wait till the next munsif arrives. So I cannot wait for 5 years for the new munsif to appear.
Now I want the incharge court to pass the ex-parte injunction order, can the incharge court pass the order as my case has merit, but the question is under which law / act is the incharge court authorised to pass such an order.
Please help! If any lawyer from patna or delhi would like to file the suit in Patna high court and obtain the ex-parte injunction order simulatneusly while the suit is pending in madhubani as multiplicity of proceedings does not apply to injunction, are openly welcome.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Share of property
A and B were husband and wife. C was their only son, D is elder daughter and E younger daughter. F is wife of C. G and H are sons of C. I is wife of G. Of these individuals A, C and G have expired before 2013. B owned a house property which was sold recently for 80 lakhs. B has been forcefully kept by E with her and not allowed to meet D. In fact B being 90 years old is incapable of taking any conscious decision. So the entire process of property sale was handled by E keeping D in dark. Now what E has done is she has given share of sale proceeds to everyone i.e. B , E herself, F, H and I but deprived D. Can D now take any legal recourse to get her share? If yes under which law and section? Please advise.