Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

N.K.Assumi   14 September 2008 at 12:58

Distinction between Hacker and Cyber Terrorist:

What is the distiction between hacker and cyber terrorist in cyber law?

N.K.Assumi   14 September 2008 at 06:08

Mobile tower a hazardous substance?

Apart from the mobile phone Mobile tower is the main actor of emitting electro- magnetic radiation.The query is, can we regard this mobile tower as hazardous substance under various environmental laws?

advocate satya   13 September 2008 at 15:55

contest and non contest matter

it is heard in challan cases of traffic magistrate that some cases are contest case and some are non contest cases , can anyone provide a list of contest and non contest matters in motor vehicle cases.

govind   13 September 2008 at 14:23

banking law

whether cooperative banks can acquire the debts from other commercial banks and can proceed fOR recovery under the RDDBFI ACT 1963 AND SARFAESI act 2002

anonymus   12 September 2008 at 21:10

counter claim

dear sirs, its just on academic aspect. what would the right course when in a suit a counter claim is made by the defendant and coming to this the plaintiff files a petition to withdraw the suit by making an endorsement.The defendant makes an application that the plaintiff cannot withdraw and that he may be transposed as the plaintiff.

madhurMehta   12 September 2008 at 13:06

judgement

hello

PLEASE GIVE ME THE JUDGMENT OF
2002(2)CTC 213 judgement of madras high court by lordship E.Padmanabhan.J

THANKS IN ADVANCE

Mohamed Ali   12 September 2008 at 09:39

Deleting LR's on record..

Dear Sir,

Brief about my case

(In our partition suit there are 11 decree holders, 6 brothers and 5 sisters,

There share are as follows as per decree.

2*6 share for Brothers + 1*5 share for Sisters, so total 17 shares , Male gets 2 shares and female gets 1 share as per Mohameddan Law.So as per decree 2/17th share for male and 1/17th share for sisters.)


The suit was filed in 1946 in Additional court, it was preliminary decreed in 1952, then some guys went to appeal after the highcourt proceedings in 1960, it was finally decreed in Additional court in 1970, and FDP is file in 1984.

All the main 11 decree holders were dead before filing FDP in 1984,

Our concern

In our case as our Great Grandmother is 3rd plaintiff in the O.S, is entitle for 1/17th share,

She had three children s 1 son(predeceased), 2 daughters,
she died in 1978 and her son died in 1974 prior to her death before the FDP was filed,

while filing for FDP in 1984,They brought on record her heirs ie 2 daughters and Predeceased sons children while filing FDP.

As per Mohameddan LAW, Predeceased Sons/Daughters Children will not have share in their Grand parents property as they are entirely excluded by their uncle and aunts who survived their parents at the time of their death.

We have a raised an objection thru an advocate in section 151 cpc in FDP proceedings,

To delete this predeceased sons LR’s who are on record unknowingly or because of lack of Legal knowledge, to their their aunts,

How to proceed to get these predeceased son’s LR deleted from record in this pending FDP proceedings and Under which section of Civil procedure code.
which Civil procedure code need to be appllied to remove this LR's on record, who are not entitle for share,
in FDP proceedings.


Sir, My concern is , I don’t want to go for another Original suite after FDP proceedings, I want this Predeceased son’s LR’s to be removed before closing of FDP. FDP must close on only 2 daughters and their heirs as the only one’s entitle for in 1/17th share of my great grand mother.

N.K.Assumi   12 September 2008 at 06:59

Registered documents:

If a registered documents dully registered before the Registration officer is it a conclusive proof?

chiranjib mukherjee   11 September 2008 at 20:11

LEGAL PRACTITIONERS' ACT,1879

Whether the 'Legal Practitioners' Act has been repealed? If so, when?

G. ARAVINTHAN   11 September 2008 at 16:52

Interest in a money suit

To what extent the plaintiff can claim interest from the defendant in a suit for recovery of money?