srinivasan
20 June 2009 at 14:00
what is right of the daughter in partnership firm with in the family members after 2005 as a copastner after the death of her father interstate sir,the partnership was between the family members alown not stranges.Her father was a partner with his brothers in different business,since they sold a property which was divied among brothers as ajointfamily property,the funds where invested in his partnership firm with his family members thatis his 2 sons leaving the daughters.Will the daughter get equal shair in the partnership business,since they were not included in the partnership deed.will the daughters be treated as copasners along with the sons.
rahul mishra
20 June 2009 at 13:27
Is there any law in civil for disable person under rent control act
V K Khanna
20 June 2009 at 05:26
Evidence is closed of both sides. Cross examination is over of both sides. Hearing has started. The matter is argued and completed by Complainants and Opposite Party(OP) No.1.
OP2 was to argue but OP3 submits a petition for fresh evidence and desires stay in the hearing till expert advice is received by court.
Is it permissible under the law if not any ruling on the matter. If anyone can guide.
V K Khanna
SUBHASH SHARMA
19 June 2009 at 15:32
ONE OF MY CLIENT MR. RAMESH PURCHASED A CAR ON INSTALLMENT BASIS THROUGH A DEALER.
HE PAID INSURANCE IN CASH TO A AGENT BUT ACTUALLY AGENT PAID INSURANCE PREMIUM BY HIS CHEQUE AND CHEQUE GOT DISHONOURED LONG BACK.
CAR WAS HIRED TO SOMEONE ON RENTAL BASIS.
ON THE WAY CAR MET WITH AN ACCIDENT.
WHAT IS THE RELIEF FOR CAR OWNER
A K
19 June 2009 at 12:46
Hi,
I was recruited by a company in April month this year. I joined that company in the first week of may. I was working fine and my work was being appreciated by my boss and others persons involved. Then later the same month (after 28 working days), I was given the termination letter and was shown the door of the company within 15 minutes. No notice was given to me.
Brief on this issue:
I only have the offer letter and the termination letter given by the company. I was expected to get the detailed appointment letter mentioning the details regarding HR policies, breakup of salary etc...Also, I asked for ID Card, Visting Card etc... but they told me that they are under processing. I got at the beginning a Laptop, a Data Card but all that was taken back at the day of termination.
I contacted the management, but three different people gave me three different answers.
I was told that my educational profile doesn't fit the required role(it's a kind of joke......... they have realized this after i had worked for 28 days). Also, another person told me that there has been structural change within the company, so company doesn't see a long term career with me. Moreover, my termination letter says that my performance was not satisfactory. First of all my boss is the right person to judge my performance and he has no issues. Also how can a person be judged in just 28 days. When I asked about this performance issue to the management, they said just ignore it. We didn't mean it.
So basically they have no reason to defend this termination. Just because they were careless when I was recruited, so they are giving vague reasons to defend this.
I have been left jobless in this crisis affected job scenario. I m very disturbed. Please help me to fight this issue. Guide me how should I carry forward this issue.
shivraj
18 June 2009 at 21:10
In one case partition happened in 1977 in general stamp of RS.5/- which is unregistred in form can this stamp applicable in court for partition? if yes plz give reference to any case laws? thank u.
jayaveladvocate
18 June 2009 at 11:24
I am witnessing a bizzare point at point drafting the petition for the impleading the Legal reps. of the deceased litigation, the court staffs always insist on the impleading deceased and adopting the same cause title with slight modification by insertion of new Legal reps is it right. If someone is dead why should we keep him in all the subsequent Interloqutory applications, I do not object the to keep the name of the deceased in the main petition or the plaint. Can any one enlighten me the statutory warranty in this matter.
gangadhar
17 June 2009 at 17:53
dear sir
please reply me various provisions of loss minimization of MACT.
Thinking you
gangadhar
e.mail- gangadhar121978@gmail.com
Khaleel Ahmed Mohammed
15 June 2009 at 18:30
ATTENTION PLOT OWNERS OF SURVEY NO.124/DHA GOPANPALLY VILLAGE OF SERILINGAMPALLY MANDAL OF RANGA REDDY DISTRICT. WHO HAS LOST THEIR PLOTS UNDER SEZ SCHEME ARE ELIGIBLE FOR COMPENSATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITTION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013. FOR MORE DETAILS CONTACT. MOHAMMAD KHALEEL AHMED, ADVOCATE A.P. HIGH COURT HYDERABAD, INDIA. CELL NO.9848574812
visit :www.mkatruelaw.com
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
REGARDING PROPERTY SALE AFTER ENTERING AGREEMENT
My wife along with five others had entered an agreement for purchase of a piece of land in december 2001.
the property consisted of three demarcated divisions.A,B and C.
A part of this property(A) was registered to the shareholders in feb 2002.
Subsequently two of the purchasing partners, puchased another part of the property(B) in their names without informing other parteners. the seller was probably informed that other partners of the sale agreement have no objections.
And susequently the third part of the property has been sold directly by the original seller to another outsider/ non party to the original agreement.
One of the shareholders of original agreement was ofcourse aware and has certified as legal sale at the time of registration of the property (C).
How can my wife claim the possession of illegally sold properties/demand our fare share. the documentry proof of advance paid in february 2002, xerox of demand drafts, against the properties B and C, is available with us.
Secondly against whom shall we file a suit. against the original holder of property OR the individual who had connived with the original seller in making further illegal sales.