My building construction is in such a way that my neighbor entry and mine faces each other, secondly the space between the two door is hardly +- 3ft. We both have security iron door. My problem is that my neighbour keeps his door open due to which it obstruct our entry and exit every time. Most of the time my door gets bang to his door. This has been happening since they started residing in our premises. We have already made complaints to the society and to our neighbour but they are not ready to close the door. They insist on keeping their doors open, giving us irritation and intention of making a fight.
I have suggested them to keep the door close
I have suggested them to change the direction of their opening, which I cannot change to the building structure.
I don’t know how to resolve this.
If any one can suggest
regards
sayed
in a suit filed for specific performance ,the suit is decreed, no prayer for delivary of propertyin plaint.can the court pass a decree for posssesion: without passing a decreefor posseion in the above the court can order delivary of propertyto dhr on petition,after execution petition was closed-u/O.21 r 35 of cpc. if,it is legallyright,is there any supported case law or else what is the course of action for jdr to resstitute his property
What is the full & detailed procedure of Changing 'Surname' in same caste?
hi there,
I want to know the process so to disown my own 3rd son who is currently in usa.
Please let me know the process, time and other things required.
any expert lawyers please provide your email or phone numbers so that i can call you direct to discuss the situation .
Thanks,
vipul
hi there,
I am 60 and want to know the process so to disown my own 3rd son who is currently in usa.
Please let me know the process, time and other things required.
any expert lawyers please provide your email or phone numbers so that i can call you direct to discuss the situation .
Thanks,
vipul
ear All,
One and half year ago my client had given advertisement to sell falt. One party given cheque of rs 1 lacs and cash of 50000. MY client has deposited cheque and given reciept of rs 500 for cash payment. Thereafter buyer was not willing to buy house and client has given advertisemtn and sold out flat to another buyer after six months.
Now my client and fist buyer did not enter into any contract or agreement. there was one bank transaction and one cash transaction.
The first buyer has made police complaint against my client on the ground of fraud that my client has taken money and sold flat to another person.
Police has closed the complaint on the ground that it is civil matter.Now first buyer will applea directly into court.
Can anyone advise about what is the position of law in this matter? Can anyone claim payment made without any contraction evidence.?
Can my client can claim that payment made for professional services / remuneration and not for house sale?
Dear Sirs,
Can a fresh case or appeal against a Supreme
Court judgement is Possible.If its possible
How and wht to do.....Urgent Please
Husband drives wife out of the house in middle of night. All belongings are with him. He and his parents insult and illtreat the girl and her parents and leave no option to communicate. They dont respond to phone call or sms or e-mail. So girls parents approached his relatives to bring about some mode of communication to have a reconciliation. Husband is alleging that by approaching relatives the girls parents have defamed him and wants to file a suit for defamation. Is it possible? Is there sufficient ground to file for defamation?
My client is very poor person, she is 50 years old lady, Now i wanted to file Pauper suit, regarding Promissory note, the total value of the suit is with interest Rs.50,000/-, kindly help to me, if anybody have pauper suit format, please give, i am waiting for format.
suit for the deconstruct construction
hello all respected learned my query is as attatched file
At the side of home mr x construction was taken place by mr y the said land probably in the name of mrs. z
According to the said dispute x applied before the chief officer for the remove the construction and stop construction and with the connection of the said matter chief officer issued letter to y for the stop construction and remove the construction which is already constructed by mr y the letter of chief officer ignored by mr y so chief officer second time issued the same letter as final instruction then also no any kind of the steps taken by the mr y
Therefore mr x demanded the all things under the R T I act with the connection of the said property but with the surprise he got that no any type the property on the name of mr y but that is the true fact that the construction is taken place by him and under the instruction of him
Finally mr x wrote a letter to the depyuty collector and colletor and with the said letter collector wrote to the chief offcier to prevent the said construction and remove the construction which was already constructed by mr y
In the reply of the letter of collector the chief officer wrote that there is no any property in the name of mr y therefore no nedd to stop it the chief officer also declare that there is no any kind of the development permission given by the authority.
Relief
To remove the construction which was constructed by the mr
Wheter is it necessary party chief officer for the explanation