Anonymous
22 March 2010 at 12:44
Hello Friends,
There's a slum redevelopment project going at my place from last 5 years.As per the SRA law, the developer should provide transit camps to residence... But the developer is not providing the same.Instead, telling the tenants to take cheques & settle at other place till he rehabs the area.
for which he is making agreement (Notary),but not making us registered. Is it wise to move on with Notary???...
And the most important question, Notary is valid for how many months or years???
Pls suggests...
Anonymous
22 March 2010 at 12:37
the a, b, c, and d are joint owners of the property, the property is agricultural field, Mr. a, b. c, and d are made a sale agreement with Mr. E and give irrevocable power of attorney to Mr. G, after one year Mr. E was paying the full amount of consideration of GPA of Mr.ABCD, and Mr. G had executed the sale deed in favour of Mr.E. Before executing the said deed Mr. a was expired and his righs are devolved into Mr. b c and d and they are become joint owers of said property.
In above case the entry of said sale transactoin is rejected by Mamlatdar for giving reson of death of Mr. a, and note that power of attorney is automatically cancelled and thereofre sale deed is void.
Is there any reported judgements under Powers of attorney act, for showing - declaring that, in any case of death, righst of deceased donnor (one of the executor of Power of attorney) are automatically devolved - survives into its co-owners.
In this case I think b, c and d are survivers of Mr. a.
help....
Anonymous
22 March 2010 at 11:23
X created a trust with respect to one of the properties he owned and the beneficiaries named therein were his grandsons namely A and B (sons of Y). X & Y were the trustees. As the income of the trust property was not sufficient and the trust was earning a loss, X filed an application u/s 36 of the Trust Act and obtained the necessary permission to develop the said property to prevent loss and injury to the estate. However before the property could be developed X expired.
The trust deed mentioned that on the expiry of A & B and in the absence of lineal descendants of A and B the property would vest in favour of C&D (sons of Z, another son of X.) or their lineal descendants.
Z, C & D filed a partition suit claiming half share with respect to the said property. The court granted an order of status quo.
In order to minimise the loss of the estate and to fulfill the desire of the settlor to develop the property, Y alongwith his co-trustee intends to get the property developed for the interest of A & B.
Under these circumstances:
1. Can the court stop the development of the said property?
2. Does Z, C or D has any valid claim at this stage?
3. What are the remedies available to Y or A and B so that the property could be developed so as to minimise loss of the estate and benefit of A & B which was the intention of the trust?
sanjay sharma
22 March 2010 at 09:24
sir,
i am residing in dehradun in a bulding which is owned by four landlords, one of them is me residing at ground floor. Sir one manjeet singh is constructing illegal rooms at first floor making an opering of window towards my premisis and one room at second floor (tin shed). i reported the matter to mdda, dehradun but they did not stopped the construction they only issued a show cause notice to him asking him to show map etc. now i request what i can do in the matter
regards
sanjay sharma
Anonymous
22 March 2010 at 05:20
we are staying in maharashtra jalgaon district and we have huge property and but most of the property in possetion of old tainent and two or three have their own property, two are not paying rent just everybody is asking money please help me
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
21 March 2010 at 22:21
Dear Sir.
1. I am contesting a civil suit at Civil Judge [S.D] from last one 2 years. I draft the papers for my client and after that present to them read and tell them & after if agreed took the sign of my clients on each application or letter and after that deposit it before court of law.
But
The adverse party counsel move a single page letter or application without the sign of his Parties and makes his sign on application or letter only and filed it.
2. would the CPC provides exemption of not make a sign compulsory on each application of actual parties and engaging counsel is only sufficient to make his sign only and filed it before court.
Or
the actual parties also have to sign each application or letter with counsel to present before court.
3. It is wrong practice or right for not taking signs on each application in CPC and the counsel have liberty to file any paper by making his sign only on each court dates.
4. What provisions are in CPC that provides exemption of not taking signs of actual parties on application or letter and counsel have power to make his sign only on applications or letter?
Anonymous
21 March 2010 at 21:27
Dear Sir,
I am an accidental claim lawyer in Dmaoh civil court.
There is a Query that we have a series of Bus accidental case.there was 42 peoples injured.
The problem is that there is no MLC report of 20 people who had injured.
So is there any rulling or citation for no requirement of MLC in accidental claim cases.
IF THERE IS ANY CITATION OR RULLING PLEASE FORWARD DETAILS...
Regards:
Abhinesh M. Agrawal
M Ravinder Babu Advocate Parka
21 March 2010 at 20:38
WHEN A REGISTERED GIFT CAN BE CANCELLED.IS THERE ANY LIMITATION
M Ravinder Babu Advocate Parka
21 March 2010 at 20:34
WHEN A REGISTERED GIFT CAN BE CANCELLED.IS THERE ANY LIMITATION
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
backyard of residential
sir, I have file suit against my neighbor regarding my backyard property of residential at Karnataka session court Bench I & get the stay.
All Crossing Examination have completed. I have one more residence attached (Slot) with disputed residence. However, defendant lawyer was asked submission the paper of non disputed residence which i have submitted in original manner (Sale deed copy of non disputed residence).
Further, he want to ask question of that property which is not concern with disputed property.
Sir, i want to ask you that whether he has any leagal rights to ask the question of that non-disputed residence.
If no than pls carify the leagal points.
plssssssssss reply ! as an early