vinod bansal
21 March 2010 at 13:21
R/Members
My client is doing business of grain trading in food grain mandi and he used to export grains like wheat/rice etc. to different -2 states and nepal,bangla desh etc.He used to hire trucks from throughout Haryana from transport companies but now in Jind city some notorious/crl type persons has started exploit and threat to my client by saying that they have organised a truck operator union in Jind and now he(my client)is bound to hire trucks only from there truck union on exorbitant rates,otherwise he would have to face dire consequences,my client on my advice made a representation before higher authorities in Jind with written complaint,but police and adm. officers instead of taking any legal action opined my client to avail/hire trucks from their so called Truck uniopn as they are paying "BEGAR" to officers as and when required.Yesterday membersi.e. infact criminals snatched documents from driver of a truck who was loading grain from the godown of my client and documents are in their possession till now,police is not taking any action against them reason best known to them.I want to know,whether such type of TRUCK Union is legal/authorised or not in Haryana as i had read a news at the time of taking oath as CM by Hon,ble Mr. Hooda in last term of his Chief Minister that he has dissolve every truck union in Haryana and now running of truck union in Haryana is illegal,i have gone through so many CWP decided by our Hon,ble Highcourt in cases of Punjab in which HC has pleased to passes an order to concerened police to take action against such type activities in the name and grab of truck unions and further to take appropriate step for smooth functioning of business as it is fundamental right.I want to know is there similar situation on legal point on this issue in Haryana,can i file a injuction suit before civil court for returning of documents. With Regards Vinod Bansal Advocate Jind Haryana
Anonymous
21 March 2010 at 12:57
I appointed a lawyer and filed suit in Mangalore in Jan, 2007. Lawyer did not attend Court and therefore I lost the case in October, 2007. Lawyer was surely bribed by the opposite party. Lawyer always kept saying that case is still running. I came to know that judgement and decree has been done only in April, 2009. i.e. after 17 months.
Law of Limitation for appeal in High Court is 60 days. I have appealed in High Court and have asked for a Condonation of Delay CD of 15 months specifying very clearly about the corruption of my lawyer. I have prayed that the suit should be sent back to the Mangalore Civil court, so that I can get justice. The suit in Bangalore High Court is currently pending for admission.
If I win this appeal and my prayer is granted, I have no problems. I will be able to fight my case again in lower court with a different lawyer.
But, if I lose this appeal due to law of limitation for appeal, I want to file a case in the Bar Council of Karnataka in Bangalore against my lawyer.
In this case, what is the start date for counting the Law of Limitation of two years to file a case against lawyer for deficiency of Service? Is it the day I came to know in April, 2009 Or the date of the judgement of this Condonation of Delay filed in the High Court?
I do not want to file complaint in Bar Council right now since I am in Mangalore and Bar Council is in Bangalore and I do not want to fight two cases simultaneously.
Thanking all in advance for your esteemed answers.
Anonymous
21 March 2010 at 10:34
Suit filed by co-op society against the company private Ltd. And its directors in civil court for recovery of loan amount some director have not sign the loan documents society gone in liquidation in liquidator issued notices u/s 105(h) of Mah.co-op act. Then some directors have filed amendment application for counter claim in W.S then the liquidator tried to withdraw the suit u/the O-23 R-1 without leave of court.
Whether the director can succeed in to restrict the liquidator for withdrawal of suit?
If yes under which provision and give the related case laws or cited cases?
Thank u.
Anonymous
21 March 2010 at 08:46
Respected seniors,
On what grounds the husband can file divorce O.P against the wife?
plese reply with latest citations.
sunil bhassin
21 March 2010 at 02:23
pls answer my query.. partnership deed at will of 4 partners having partnership firm.. only 1 partner dissolves the firm by written notice to other partners and news paper notice. very same day 2 of the partners make a fresh partnership deed of 2 partners and mention other 2 have withdrawn and inform the registrar of firms that we are the only 2 partners and the registrar reconstitutes the firm and issues new form A mentioning 2 partners "cease to exsist" how can a firm dissolved be reconstituted by the registrar without the dissolution deed .. can the registrar be made party to a suit for the mistake he has made and be told by the court to cancel the certificate of reconstituted firm. and how do we go about.. and wht procedure should we follow can there be criminal case be made on the 2 partners who made the new deed
pls reply its most most urgent
Alok Motan
21 March 2010 at 00:41
hey there... i have filed an injunction suit against two parties out of which one is an unregistered firm and have no clue (whether partnership or not)and other one is a pvt ltd. co., my question is against the first firm...how to make it a party as it is neither a juristic person nor a natural person. i dont know abt the wherebouts of the owners/partners...
how to deal with it please suggest....ASAP
Pankaj Maheshwari
20 March 2010 at 22:26
The cheque amt of rs. 500/- has been returned by union bank of india even though the balance in the Saving Account was amt rs. 40000/-
So which is law is applicable to this case as I have filed the case in the consumer court
Kindly request to guide
...
bhanu pratap720
20 March 2010 at 20:51
case law on the point that all the witnesses (pw) should be first examined altogether in the chief examination and only then the cross examination should start.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
AP. High court stayed further proceedings in the suit
HI,parkaL. Dist .Warangal,AP.junior civil judge in direcly supporting one advocat saying,to me & ,posted the case,
to file counter IN IA and for hearing, though entire proceedings in the suit stayed by Hon'ble JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ,HYDERBAD,AP
CAN I LAUGH OR CRY.PLEASE SUGGEST !