Neeraj Kaushal
05 April 2010 at 19:49
I have filed suit for permanent injunction against 3 defendants restraining them from raising any type of construction over the suit land , at the time of filing suit two defendants are serving in Indian army and they are not present at the time of cause of action , whether civil proceedings can be initiate against that person not present at the time of cause of action . I have written in my pleading that defendants are digging the suit land for raising construction and i have also mentioned it in my cause of action para , please guide me with citations,
Rajini Sunderraj
05 April 2010 at 19:35
Sir,
My husband is an NGO. He is a President,founder and chairman of 3 NGO's registered with the govt of TN.
I am a Govt servant working as a teacher in TN. My husband wants me to be the "TREASURER" of the organisation to avoid misuse of funds in the org.
1) My query is, can I become the Treasurer ( office Bearer) continuing the same full time Govt. teacher job?
2) My colleagues say that one should not be the President of more than one NGO, Is it true. If YES what should my husband do.
Pl guide us on the following.
Smt. Rajini sunderraj
Anonymous
05 April 2010 at 18:54
Hi experts,
the resident(just backside of the proposed house building) objected the construction in violation of the set backarea to the extent of 1.50' west, 1.50' east & 0.50'north of the building. the learned judge in the Trial court, ordered the demolition of the portion in violation of the set back area. the building is demolished keeping the foundation which is 3' high from the ground level.
the owner of the site, transferred a portion of the site to his son by gift deed, who started construction of the building, obtaining the fresh licence & plan in his name, on the same foundation but according to the approved plan and leaving proper set back area as per plan. The court, on an appeal by the decree holder that foundation was not removed, ordered the complete removal ofall the construction to the ground level as per earlier decree. was it,then, necessary to remove the foundation also,as arguing by the decree holder? if revison petition is filed, will the housebuilder get remedy?
AARKAY12345
05 April 2010 at 17:45
Hi, I have purchased a 2 Eker agricultural land in the name of my wife by a sale deed of Rs. 1 Lakh, This land was given as whole life maintenance for her and we agreed to seperate on this, by filing mutual HMP in district court. I have paid the half of the land cost i.e. 1 LAKH and rest half to pay after the the separation.
After the Sale deed of the land in her name she refused to file the mutual HMP, and hence I have not paid the remaining Rs. 1 LAKH. At the time of making sale deed i have taken in writing from her on the bond of 100 Rs. That she will never sale , transfer or take any loan against the property. Now she has sold the property to back to seller by another sale deed and not taken my permission.
I would like to know if I can file a civil suite againt her / the buyer ?
Anonymous
05 April 2010 at 16:09
Dear Sirs,
I had entered into an agreement for the purchase of a piece of land with another person and paid him an advance of Rs.ten lakhs. But when he did not get the plot registered in my name in spite of me being ready to pay the balance, I sent him a notice for performance of his part of the contract. Now, if instead of filing a specific performance suit, i file a money recovery suit, do i need to send a fresh notice. Please let me know.
Thanks.
Saroj Kumar Meher
04 April 2010 at 18:36
Hi,
I am Saroj Meher working as an Asst. Manager - Finance in a MNC at Mumbai. My office has been taken upon a lease and License agreement from Apr 07 to Dec 09. On expiry we again made a fresh Leave and License Agrement (registered with the Registrar, Goregaon (W)) for a further period of 3 years and at the time of executing the agreement, we had paid the rent for the entire year 2010 in advance by way of cheque. Also we have given Rs. 20 lacs towards Security Deposit. Our landlord had not paid the society charges and hence his name appears in the notice board under the defaulter's list since the last 1 year. Recently, the secretary of the society of our office builing called up to inform that they will be taking necessary legal actions against the landlord. Under such circumstances, what are our rights as a licensee in case the society takes necessary legal action.
Anonymous
04 April 2010 at 12:56
please send the information regarding auction purchaser purchsed the property through Court Auction. And the same the property has been mortgaged in a bank.
jayachandran
04 April 2010 at 11:52
Under what circumstances, a Vessel/Ship can be arrested under Admirality jurisdiction of a High Court.
Whether for attaching the cargo in the vessel, can the vessel be arrested
Pl.answer
SATYANARAYANA K
04 April 2010 at 11:52
"A" met an accident to "B". "B" is senior citizen and 60 years old got grievous injury and fractured 2 legs.
Now "B" wanted to file a case under Motor Vehicles Act, against "A". There is no insurance coverage.
"A" is poor lady, "A" cannot any any amount to "B".
If "B" file a case under Motor Vehicles Act, and if got judgment in favour of "B".
How can "B" execute Judgment against "A".
"A" have no any immovable, movable property, just "A" is doing private job, but there is no source to savings only income is coming for survival of the life of "A" and her childres, "A" is also widow.
My query is
1. Is there any imprisonment if not pay the judgment amount to "A".
2. Actually "B" is poor really there is no source of income, what is the position legally, how to escape from the case
Respected Experts if any other remedy is there, please suggest, i am waiting for your valuable reply sir
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
SEEK URGENT REPLY
URGENT
RESPECTED MEMBERS,
ONE OF OUR EMPLOYEE A CONSTUCTED HOUSE AT NAGPUR AND FOR THAT TOOK LOAN FROM CREDIT COOPRATIVE SOCIETY FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF OFFICE ,EMPLOYEE A CLAIM BENIFIT U/SEC24-A AND 80 -C AS PER INCOME TAX ACT 1961 THE OFFICE REFUSE TO GIVE BENIFITAS ABOVE AND ADVISE EMPLOYEE GET RETURN FROM INCOME TAX DEPARMENT MY QUESTION IS
1) WHETHER IS IT MANDATORY TO CONFER/GRANT BENIFIT AS CLAIMED ABOVE
2)IS THE ACTION OF MY OFFICE IS LEGAL