kamlesh
10 August 2010 at 22:45
if trustees of the any property was die , than there will be any rigths to the represantative to the property under the given section ?
anshul sangal
10 August 2010 at 22:42
is there any ruling of high court or supreme court related to amendment in affidavit.
Anonymous
10 August 2010 at 18:31
pw chief evidence was filed but pw1 was not cross examined despite several opportunities by the defendents cousel after forfeiture respondents filed a petition for reopen which was dissmissed respondents never prefereed appeal then pw2 chief affidavit wass filed some unto ward incidents has happened where respondents have filed a petition for demarcation fo sy No's but to petitioners bad luck petitioners documents there was no mention that their sy No is falling in a common layout. during the pendency of the cross examination demarcation was done. but to the suprise of petitioners the petitioners have found their sy no is falling in common layout in some documents what is the fate of the demarcation . since the respondents have knowledge their sy no is in common layout. before finding the documents pw2 was corss examined what is the fate of the pw2 when the documents pertaining the petitioners sy.No is common layout which is laong withthe sy.No of the respondents.
Anonymous
10 August 2010 at 18:10
Query:
There are two plaintiffs for a recovery suit. one is a company and other is a individual who is the promoter of the company.
Now a decree has been issued against the defendants and in favour of the plaintiff.
Now the issue is that before the decree was passed the name of the comapny was changed.
Now the Decree holder plans to file execution of the decree.
Now the name of the company is in issue???
How should the execution be filed with the name of the company changed before the decree was passed???
Anonymous
10 August 2010 at 18:07
I want to know the fate of evidence of pw2 when the pw1 was not cross examined and pw2 evidence is not upto the mark
Ronak
10 August 2010 at 17:24
We had a property suit on which status quo was maintained. Now the status quo has been rejected by the court, but the suit is still in continuation. Order has been passed saying that the plaintiff has unnecessarily maintained the status quo causing damage and delay for development. We have filled a damage suit in means of compensation for malitious prosecution and have asked for attachement of plaintiffs property. Can the atachment before judgement be made by the court and how. Please tell in detail
Anonymous
10 August 2010 at 16:46
With respect to stamp duty on Bank Guarantees for construction contract, which article of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 is applicable - Article 5[h] or Article 54? [please refer to latest amendment of 2010]
Anonymous
10 August 2010 at 16:02
Our regd deed of declaration and bye laws of the owners assn says "commericial activity in the apartment is prohibited".
Does this mean "running a regd office or business" or does it also include private turions and consultancy done by owners for their own livelihood. If it is done without violating the rules and regulations and without any major inconveience to the residents can it be permitted?
In short, does conducting tution or music classes for a small group of children within the flat amounts to commercial activity which should not be allowed?
Anonymous
10 August 2010 at 15:36
In a redevelopment agreement between the developer and the tenants, if there are two contradictory statements, can the agreement
be declared null and void?
Since when is the power of attorney is to be constituted on a Stamp paper?
After signing an agreement with a developer,can a tenant sell his rental flat to hte developer?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Mental Agony
what is the legal meaning of Mental Agony?? How to prove that one has Mental Agony?? Request all the learned members....Is there any case-laws of HIGH COURTS or the APEX COURT of INDIA??