Suri.Sravan Kumar
15 October 2010 at 20:05
Eicher van is carrying a load of liquor/whisky from Karnataka state to Andhra Pradesh. The vehicle belongs to AP. The policy was issued for goods carrying commercial vehicle. The driver was holding LMV Transport. The vehicle was involved in an accident and the owner of the van lodged claim with the Insurance Company for the damages to his vehicle. Insurance co repudiated the claim stating that the driver of the van is not holding a valid DL as there was no endorsement on his DL to drive Hazardous goods.
Now the question is whether the DL of the driver is valid to transport whisky. Is it necessary to have endorsement on DL to transport liquor? Any citations in support.
shravankumar
adv.vivek saraf
15 October 2010 at 20:01
sir i want some solution on the point of stmp duty. my quation is can deffendant join as a plaintiff in a suit and can his/her stamp duty will be exemted?
sunny
15 October 2010 at 17:57
IF both son and his wife means Daughter in law of lady(HIndu) expired.That lady is living with one more son and his wife.And both expired person survived by their two minors childern .In this case if lady means grandmother of children taken succession from court for her son and daughter in law.For both son and daughter in law she taken the succession certificate with three successor which are both minor children and herself.
1)But as per law of succession she can claimed to be successor for her son only while in case of her deceased daughter in law she can not be successor when her two minor children are left.only minors should be successor for Daughter in law of that lady(Lady can be guardian but not successor)?is this correct?
2)If it is correct.Then succession order which she gained from district court is not correct.
And can it be challenged?in what way it will be challenged or under what section?
rashmiramanath
15 October 2010 at 16:27
Dear all
please send the format for filing appeal in supreme court of india regarding appeal against NCDRC judgements.
the format of filing, affidavit needed and fees if any along with number of copies to be filed is required.
please reply
thanks in advance
rashmi ramanath
JAIME
15 October 2010 at 16:05
I COMPLAINED AGAINST ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION TO THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR IN 2007 THROUGH THE OFFICE OF THE MAMLATDHAR. THE MAMLATDHAR NEVER TILL DATE ATTENDED THE CASE AND THE RESPONDENT TILL DATE FAILED TO FILE HIS REPLY. THAT NO ACTION WAS FORTHCOMMING I SUBMITTED APPLICATION FOR INTERVENER. APPEARS THAT THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR IS HAND IN GLOVES WITH THE RESPONDENT'S LAWYER. THE RESPONDENT LAWYER ATTENDED INTENDING TO ARGUE THE MATTER WITHOUT ANY WRITTEN REPLY TO MY INVERVENER APPLICATION AND TO HAVE MY APPLICATION DISMISSED. COULD I PLEASE BE GUIDED TO OBTAINING AN ORDER FOR INTERVENTION. THANKS VERY MUCH.
Anonymous
15 October 2010 at 15:16
how do i know the property where i am staying is a trust property or not?
aman kumar
15 October 2010 at 12:44
THERE IS A GENERAL PRACTICE OF PERSONS THAT THEY USE LAND OF OUTSIDE HOUSE AS LOWAN & MAKE A BOUNDARY OR RAILING SO ROAD BECOME NARROW TO USE OF OTHERS
MANY PERSONS ENHANCE HIS /HER UPPER ROOF AREA OUT OR HIS /HER LAND ON THE ROAD
WHAT IS THE SIMPLE REMADE FOR SUCH TYPE OF WORK. IF MUNICIPALITIES & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IS NOT DO ANY THING ?
Arvind Singh Chauhan
15 October 2010 at 09:25
Sir in a boundary suit we won from High court and execution proceeding was running in lower court. Meanwhile opposite party filed SLP in SC and lower court asked them to file if there is any stay.
SC ordered " Leave granted, parties are directed to maintain status quo as obtaining today"
Please suggest ,whether lower court should stay the proceeding in the light of this order.
Another side I have a case law -
Mere filing of a petition, appeal or suit would by itself not operate as stay until specific prayer in this regard is made and thereon so order of stay passed- SC-UAD-2009(2)-539.
Anonymous
14 October 2010 at 20:30
A private aided school in tamil nadu(minority institution, malayalam) was running by its owner being father of eight children. In 1973 he made up a WILL stating that after his death his brother will have the role of Manager of the School till his death and after the death of both his eight children shall form a Trust and manage the School.
But unfortunately after the death of the founder of the school, his brother came into play and during his tenure he changed the WILL according to his wishes and made up to one of founders son the power to manage till his death also. The brother died in 1993
Because of that even after the death of both the founder and his brother, the School is run by one person instead of all such eight children by forming a trust.
case filed only belatedly after 17 years in 2009.
Now we want to know the legal remedy that may happen.
whether we shall succeed. How many years it will take
Still the one man who is the son of the founder , running the school based on the illegal WILL made by the brother of the founder of the school.
Out of the eight children four formed one group and the other formed other group including the present manager son.
Can We obtain injunction from court.
Please guide us what to be done to further stop the manager in atleast restraining him from appointing teachers and staff to the School till the disposal of the suit questioning his power to act as Manager and Correspondent.
thanks
ajith kumar
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
hi
here is one case law mr A was purchased 2 acres land from mr B , mr B is belongs to SC caste and mr A is lingayatha caste, that land was granted by govt in 1952 to mr B, mrA purhased tat land in 1975 but law says like tis 4.
Prohibition of transfer of granted lands.- (1) Notwithstanding anything in any law, agreement, contract or instrument, any transfer of granted land made either before or after the commencement of this Act, in contravention of the terms of the grant of such land or the law providing for such grant, or sub-section
1.will the law is applicabel to land?
2.how to take the permission of ptcl?
3.law exicest afer purchase the land can we challeng the law ?