Anonymous
01 November 2010 at 16:48
Respected Experts,
Plz. clarify the following doubt.
“A” is the adopted son of “B” and whereas “C” is natural father of “A”. The adopted father has given some landed property to “A” and the natural father also given some landed properties to “A” with love and affection.
I came to know that an adopted person shall not be entitled to get any property/properties from his natural father, who gives with love and affection on him.
How it can be maintainable as per Hindu Law, in case if it is carried in a dispute.
Anonymous
01 November 2010 at 16:43
Our father expired leaving Rs 8.00 Lakhs in his fixed Deposit and saving account. He has not made any nomination and has 6 children. One of his children is refusing to sign the claim form and without the signature of all children Bank is not accepting the claim form. What is the remedy now. We have requested the Bank to release the amount proportionately to all claimants who have signed and credit their account but Bank is not accepting this request and also not paying any interest on fixed Deposit as it is not renewed.
MSC Shekar
01 November 2010 at 11:14
Old accounts of 1950 period not withdrawn till date, in operative, related papers lost.
Account Holder name and Bank name known, Can we get details of such account under RTI Act or some other legal process needs to be adopted.
Please advise,
Thanks in Advance.
Dr. Chandran Peechulli, Ph.D; FIE
01 November 2010 at 10:53
There is no iota of truth in the judgement even for the appeal as the honourable justice looked god-fearing but favoured the judgement of the lower court.
Land-grabbing Case. There is no sprinkle of truth by the respondents, in O.S.365/2004 & R.A.117/2009,Fast Track Court 2.
Dr.Chandran Peechulli to rghck.kar,
PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL. thro. Registrar General rghck.kar@nic.in For URGENT attention please.
Shri. Jagadish Singh Keher,
H.E. The Chief Justice-High Court of Karnataka State,High Court Buildings,
Opp. to Vidhana Saudha, Ambedkar Veedhi,
Bangalore-560 001.
Thro. Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka,
High Court Buildings, Bangalore-560 001.
Most Respected Sir,
I have for humble submission the following few lines, for which I am constrained to do so, encroaching your valuable and precious time of your good high office, to please intervene, for a good and just cause, thereby instil justice and fairplay in courts, so that the sanctity of the courts are maintained.
Subject: “Re-An Ex-serviceman(Senior Citizen)’s hard-earned “Land-grabbed”.
- case unreasonably dragged in courts with administrative deficiencies of liberal adjournments and aggrieved shunted between Chennai and Bangalore. In the process, the innocent only suffers. Land- grabbing case of a senior citizen & ex-serviceman, in Bangalore City Civil Court i.e. O.S.365/2004 & R.A.117/2009. Fast Track Court 2. There is no sprinkle of truth being seen, but for falsifying the truth, due to money and muscle power, to knock off my property.
Falsifying the truth by all means for gain, engaging specialised mentoring criminal- lawyers, for criminals to be tutored, availing the loop-holes, to suit the legal- process, “bringing injustice to the innocent common- litigant”, throws away the sanctity of the courts, from the minds of the common people. Therefore, it is high-time, the honourable court administration, realises this for an early corrective-action. Justice should come to the common man irrespective of whether; it is from the Lower or Higher or Supreme Court. Dr. Chandran Peechulli. Marine Waves.
“The media shouldn't be a spectator to the true happenings of crime and injustice nor play the role of a messenger in reporting without verifying the real facts. – Dr. Chandran Peechulli. Marine Waves
Common-man fails to get justice, because of inefficiency or corruption of prosecuting agencies. “Always aim at complete harmony of thought, word and deed by purifying one's thoughts and everything will go well.
Sai. R. Venkatakrishnan. Marine Waves.
I am a hard-working honest ex-serviceman, with national solidarity, whose hard-earned land grabbed and being totally harassed and humiliated to give-up, while fighting-out for justice, in Bangalore City Civil Courts, Fast Track 2, incurring since 2004, further unnecessary money, time and efforts in the old age of 64 years, it is like de-moralising the loyal citizen like me, who once came forward to sacrifice my life, to defend the nation from external threats. Now put in a state of severe mental stress/agony, for no fault of mine.
Self, an aggrieved ex-serviceman had approached various civil authorities in administration, law and order authorities, inclusive of the ADC to His Excellency the Governor of Karnataka State, who responded to the Police authorities (Ref: The Principal Secretary to Governor, Raj Bhavan, Bangalore to the Superintendent of Police, Bangalore District(Rural) vide Ltr.Ref:GS930/D/2004 dated 11th May 2004, to do the needful and help, but all of vain. Shri. Rabindranath Tagore IPS, the then IGP, Bangalore(Rural), advised the appellant (ex.serviceman) to seek the court of law for justice and alas the assistance sought of Karnataka Legal aid Services and thus the suit was filed on 06.04.2004 with great difficulties, as the appellant had to be shunted to Chennai to collect all the original documents and submit to the court for suit acceptance, which was mandatory, resulting in further time, money and his efforts. In the meanwhile, the defendants filed counter suit O.S. 341/2004, against their elder brothers Thammayanna and Eranna, who had executed the sale by the 1983 G.P.A., Affidavit and received the Sales consideration, more importantly unfairly impleading the Appellant as Defendant No.3, for Partition of Sy.No.11/2, while the other flat owners twenty-eight (28) of them were left out, on the file of Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), but to harass and humiliate me, to make me fed-up and give- up. "Chief Justice of US Supreme Court John Marshall had once said: "Power of Judiciary lies not in deciding cases, nor in imposing sentences nor in punishing for contempt, but in the trust, faith and confidence of the common man".
India though densely populated and though there could be cut-throat competition within the legal profession, these days the wrong trend, is to look for short-cuts, make fast money unlike the olden days, while no receipts given for fees, to poor litigants by advocates. Advocates therefore collude, betray and harm their clients as well, clients put in a state of confusion, as to which Advocate to be approached, for sincere professional services, to know of the loyalty-rating, since well read and travelled person also suffers, if so, what about the common man? The same aggrieved ex-serviceman had very bad experience in attending courts, shunting between Chennai and Bangalore after incurring around Rs.50,000 with a senior advocate who colluded with the opposite party and later was constrained, to changeover for economy, back to the honest legal-aid advocate, Sri. Revanna Siddappa, though with shorter experience for his age, not bold to express, who started off initially the case, and now resting with the almighty god if exists, and your kind help for justice, using your good and high office.
There is no sprinkle of truth by the respondents, who had purposefully concealed the name of Eraih, father of Eranna and Kempiah, this suppression of facts need to have been seriously viewed by the honourable court, orelse it causes grave concern to the aggrieved appellant and their family members. It is an admitted fact that one signatory of the three, in the irrevocable G.P.A., by name Krishnappa son of late Eranna and the other two signatories Thamayanna and Eranna sons of Kempiah were the bonafide vendors of the suit scheduled property, who formed the layout, sold and received the entire sales consideration of the 30 sites and the possession was delivered by the said karthas of the family, for the benefits of the said family members. The Respondents/Defendants, were therefore also beneficiaries during 1983-84, as such the respondents have delivered the possession by way of G.P.A., Affidavit and receipt of the Sales consideration. The Appellant is in possession till the year 2000 by way of G.P.A from 1983 and thereafter from 2000 by way of Sale Deed. The possession of the suit scheduled property is in continuous possession without any interruption till the illegal trespass and illegal occupation by respondents by pulling out the stone pillars installed and connected with barbed wires fencing all the sides of site 8 and 9. The Respondents had denied all this with an evil intention to knock off the property, since the appellant was residing at Chennai, rest of the site owners being local residents were not disturbed nor made a party, in the suit scheduled property. Further, delay tactics applied by adjournments, and involving me alone in the partition suit(O.S.341/04), thus all harassment and humiliation meted out by the appellant only. Justice informs only the counsel can talk, appellant has no say.
It is an error to hold that there was a temporary injunction against the Appellant /plaintiff regarding the possession of suit scheduled property during the pendency of OS.365/2004, while not considering the ex-serviceman’s hard-earned land, which was encroached, site boundary fencing pulled out forcibly and illegally taken possession. Despite “status quo” announced in the court hall, the respondents went ahead finishing and modifying the katcha shed when appellant said unfit for human living, since no ventilation itself except an unfinished door, who then fabricated the revenue records, appears taken the electricity and telephone connection, during the pendancy of the case, adding to further crimes. Please view photographs taken and submitted in the court-hall, during the initial stages, which would be self-explanatory as the proof of evidence. However, owing to their high-handedness by money and muscle-power they continued giving different versions, fabricated and frivolous statements, altering land records by cheating and misappropriation, with specialised advocates to falsify the truth. The real owner (aggrieved litigant) only knows, as to how his sentiments are hurt adding to expenditure to meet court hearings, efforts and further incurrence of money, since 2004. Lacks systematic enquiry and evaluation of evidence.
It is most humbly requested, to please use your good high office to give me justice so that my land is officially returned to me, thereby the culprits are severely punished orelse it is like encouraging the criminals to grow in society seeking easy and fast money. With respectful regards.
Yours respectfully,
(Sd.)
P. K. Chandran, * sent by postal-mail as well.
Complainant and owner of land.Ex-serviceman and Senior Citizen.
Submitted copy of written argument.
Relevant media news of D.G. of Armed Forces,New Delhi.
Set of photographs-taken when Tavarekare Police ASI., stopped the construction work and drove them away.
Address: “Kaustubha” B1/2, No.12th Cross Street, Besant Nagar, Chennai-600090.
Phone: 098400-84216, e-mail: pkc484@yahoo.com
P.S. PLEASE HELP! HELP! EXPRESSING ALLEGATIONS – JUDGEMENT OF BLIND BIAS.
*AVAILING LEGAL-AID SERVICES. Judge never entertains, voice of the aggrieved litigant. Cannot afford expensive lawyer.
TO OPINE ON THE TRIAL COURT ORDER, WHICH IS APPEALED AS “ENCOURAGING CRIMINALS TO GROW & PILING-UP OF CASES IN COURT”, WHEN ALL THIS COULD HAVE BEEN NIPPED-UP, INITIALLY IF LAW & ORDER WAS AFFECTIVE.
3 attachments — Download all attachments
Chief Justice-Karnataka High Court..doc
41K View Download
Written Argument-FastTrack Court.Sep.2010 .doc
47K View Download
Land Grab.doc
49K View Download
Anonymous
01 November 2010 at 06:54
Even after paying full builder not conveying apt by absolute sale deed but he has given possession and I have occupied. Reason stated is non-receipt of OC from BBMP (Blr). I have waited for nearly 2 yrs. What can I do? Can I claim interest. Which court to go to? My life savings at stake pls help experts.
Kamalakkannan Raju
31 October 2010 at 21:00
I possess a valid SC certificate signed from the Tahsildar of Tiruchengodu Taluk, Salem District,TN dated in the year 93.
Now,as i am going to take up my new assignment in SBI as PO, they want me to produce a certificate which has been issued within 1 year as on 1st Nov, 2010..means i need to show a certificate issued after 1st Nov ,2009.
my query is- can i take this certificate and approach the Tahsildar of Chennai area( m currently residing in chennai) and request him to avail me a new certificate on the basis of the previous one....though i don't entirely belong to this taluk but for the fact that i have been staying here for the past 1 year.
Is there a provision that a different Tahsildar can issue a new certificate like this?
if not, please guide me what should i do in this regard...
i can't go back to my hometown and get this thing done as i don't have time in my hand!
Anonymous
31 October 2010 at 19:55
Dear Sir,
In a civil case there is contempt of HC order & the person is obstructing in implementation of order(he is persistently violating law). I am planning to file Contempt Pet.Can I pray to HC to issue directions to Corporation & Police to help in implementation of its order in the Contempt petition itself?
Please guide.
Anonymous
31 October 2010 at 15:25
I have got the decree of restitution of conjugal rights against my wife in session court.
my Query : After how many day i can go for EXCECUTION OF THIS DECREE.
Neeraj Kaushal
31 October 2010 at 12:17
i have filed a revenue appeal supported with application under section 5 of Indian Limitation Act because my appeal is time barred , i need a citation for condoning the delay in filing appeal , help me .
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
settlement Deed
One grandma having 4 sons and 3 duaghters ( Muslims)
Her husband had expired in 2000.
when her husband was alive he bought a house in her (grandma) name & registered it.
In 2009 nine , her third son took his mother to registrar office & got transfered the house by a stttlement deed registerd in his name.
( Actually the mother was told that he is taking only the power to deal with the property as other children are insisting for separation.)
with in a month he( Son ) transfered the said property to his wife (D in law) name by another seettlemend Deed
When this come to the knowledge of the grandma she went to Registrar office & cancelled seetlement deed signed by her to son.
Now the seetlement given by her son to his wife (daugher in law ) is still in force.
Whether a person got a seetlement deed in his favour can make it again to another person with in a month or not ?
Second question: When the first seetment is made cancelled, Will it make the second seetlement automatically cancelled or not?
Kindly advice?