Anonymous
21 November 2010 at 15:44
Public Trust covered under Bombay Public Trust Act 1950.
Trust Rule requires that 4 Trustees be elected by direct elections by the members.Maximum term is for 3 years or till pne resigns or paases away.
3 trustees have reisgned but instead of having elections the fourth Trustee has co-opted members who do not have the trust or the confidence of a majority of the members.
Accounts presented for 2008/9 too are filled with errors so members have refused to approve them without full details being provided.
Trustee now says that even though his term is over he will not call for elections till 2008/9 and 2009/10 accounts are passed as presented by the Auditor without questions.
What does one do legally now.
Anonymous
21 November 2010 at 15:24
A Public Trust approved Rule states that the signature of the Hon Treasurer is compulsory and that of the Hon Secretary is the scond signatory to all Trust cheques.
But the President got himself and one more Trustee as alternative signatories.
We are told that bypassing both the Treasurer & the Seceatary the President and the other Trustee have been issuing cheques, enashing cheques in bearer form
(cash across the counter).
We spoke to a bank official who has said that the bank is only concerned with the operating mandate filed and not the Trust rules.
What do the members do when they know (but cannot get proof) of this siphoning out of funds.
Trust banks with a co-operative bank and they say they not covered by the RTI Act in Maharashtra.
Member (Account Deleted)
21 November 2010 at 13:59
can a common judgment be challenged by each petitioner seperately, before supreme court?
Member (Account Deleted)
21 November 2010 at 13:57
if a common judgment for two petitions is confusing for petitioner to appeal against that order, can we apply for passing a seperate judgment for petitioner under sole title of his case?
Soma
21 November 2010 at 13:28
Husband and Wife purchased a flat jointly . There is no demarcation of share of each spouse. i.e. share of each is not mentioned in the sale deed.
Husband died leaving the wife and a minor daughter.
whether the daughter has any interest in the flat? what is the share if yes?
Whether the wife can sell the flat ignoring the daughter?
What the wife should do if she wishes to sell the property?
Daughter still minor.
Anonymous
21 November 2010 at 13:11
what is the limitation for amount due on credit cards.
By what length of time the amount cannot be recovered by banks issuing credit cards
SATYANARAYANA K
21 November 2010 at 07:52
"X" is rider of the vehicle and having valid effective LLR License. "Y" is pillion driver and having valid effective Driving License. "Z" is Pedestrian.
"X" hit to "Z". "Z" got injuries and filed a case u/s 338 of I.P.C. and Motor vehicle act, claiming compensation.
My quarries are
1. "X" want to show liability on Insurance company only to pay compensation to "Z".
2. "X" is poor person, hence "X" want to escape from liability.
3. Please provide any citation or section of law to show liability on Insurance Co only.
waiting for your valuable suggestions
Anonymous
20 November 2010 at 23:57
Sir,
For removal of encroachment done by the neighbor, when owner of the land was outside, which legal remedy is best?
How much time it will Take? And what will be modus operandi or how will be encroachment get removed if I win the suit?
Plz. Advice.
Thanks and regds,
Anonymous
20 November 2010 at 21:34
R/Members
I want to file suit or complaint in District court against color channel and Rakhi Sawant for vulgarity and objectionable scenes,under which act/ provision i can do this ,kindly provide me copy of such like suit or complaint.Thanx
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
esmentry rights
about esmentry rights