G V Triveni Prasad
23 November 2010 at 19:17
I was reading the Experyts views on the matter and want further clarification
In my case it was a public sector bank which has quoted some OS no while making out a claim agains me which was proved by documentary evidence as false and was accepted by judge so.
my question is hwter I have to intiate the action against the Bnak u/s 340 Cr.P.C. or was it for the Judge on observation to permit the action under the section
Anonymous
23 November 2010 at 19:10
What is the time frame within which the petitioner, who has won an ex parte decree to realise a sum of money from a firm, can file for execution of that ex parte decree? Experts...Please reply early.
msrao
23 November 2010 at 18:32
Sir,
My father owned 8 cents of land and that the piece of land occupied by his brother and his children for several years.Consequently my father and his brother died about 50 years back.Now the piece of land sold by my fathers brothers son and all these years we were away from our village.Last year my mother was died.Now shall I file a writ petition against the buyer as well as seller of the land.
Please do clarify.
Thanking you
MSRAO
Vijayawada
Pradeep Kumar Sharma
23 November 2010 at 18:20
If the elected President and General Secretary of Society registered under 1860 Act are acting against majority members of Governing Body of Society and also acting against interest of general members of society.
1.Can majority members suspend them ?
2.Can General Body expelled elected President and General Secretary before expiry of their term ?
3. Is there any Court judgement in this regard?
Anonymous
23 November 2010 at 16:55
A aggrieved depositor is having documents worth lakhs of rupees. There are so many others also. But not in a postion to pay court fees? How can I get back my deposit ?
rajendra
23 November 2010 at 16:45
Is it necessary to examine a witness of a Will in a suit for declaration of title as contemplated under Section 68 of Evidence Act if the defendant is not a person having 'caveatable interest' as the defendant would not have inherited the property under the Will in case of intestate death of the testator.
Anonymous
23 November 2010 at 14:04
Please give authorities for amending a civil partition suit petition before trial.
P.Balasubramaniam
23 November 2010 at 12:24
Dear Learned Seniors,
One of my client, had given security to his properties for the credit facilities availed by his friend's two companies. Unfortunaly his friend had colluded with the bank manager and extented the security to an another company and he had defaulted in repayment for the three companies. The bank had sent a demand notice under sarfaesi act to my client. Now only he came to know that fruad had alleged by the bank and his friend to incorporated the third company in the guarantee agreement. I had filed case before the Munsif Court seeking declaration that the guarantee executed by my client for the said two companies were null and void and also filed a criminal complaint againt my client's friend and the bank manager. Now the bank had initiated steps under Sec 13 (4) of the sarfaesi act and i had filed S.A.before the DRT and obtained interim stay. shall i approach for High Court for proper remady? is itpossible???
Thanks
Anonymous
23 November 2010 at 12:22
there are two parties A and B contracted on certain matter. suppose in agreement, it has been provided that in matter of dispute before going to arbitration an institution like DRB settle the dispute. but that institute is delaying the matter unnecessarily.
now I want some judgement regarding removal of this step and jump over to arbitration dirctly in case of that non working of that institution
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
RCC
Dear experts,
Iam in urgent need of your valuble suggestion in respect of R.C.C.
Sirs
In eviction petition resp No 1 has contested and resp No:2 has been set experte and finally exparte decree has been passed by the officer.
resp No:2 has filed the petition for setting aside the exparte decree with in time,which was returned by the officer by endorsing "how this petition is maintainable when the case is decided on merits".Again the petition was filed by representing that the decree was passed on merits only against resp No:1 but not resp No:2 as resp No:2 was set exparte.
My humble request to all experts to help by quoting the decisions on order 18(3)of R.C.C ACT OF ANDHRAPRADESH OR any other decisions through which the petition would be numbered .