Anonymous
29 November 2010 at 21:57
Sir,
I have filed the Petition in CAT which was allowed and was remanded back to the CAT for deciding the issue of Limitation
I have submitted that Limitation shall be counted from the date of final order given by respondents as they have not notified the result officially and hence they cannot stand on the plea of Limitation. I supported my version with RTI reply which the Hon'ble bench has taken on records
While the respondents have submitted that they have notified the result but was not availble on records
The Hon'ble C.A.T on hearing the both parties and given time to the respondent to produce the actual notification of result
I am employee wkg there in the organisation knew that they had not notified the result and had kept my candidature in dark .This they had declared in RTI Application which I had received the reply
What happened if they produce any false notification before court? Is there any remedy for that?
Whether there is any Judgments/citations which supports my plea that no notification was there and hence the plea of Limitation cannnot be maintained
Thanking you in anticipation
Anonymous
29 November 2010 at 20:41
The plaintiff obtained ex party injunction orders against defendants in property case.The defendants made their appearance through Advocate.During the pendency of petition the defendants violated the orders.The injunction was not made absolute.Whether the plaintiff can file petition under order 39 rule 3a of cpc for violation.
Member (Account Deleted)
29 November 2010 at 15:56
an application for enforcement of fundamental rights was filed before CAT for right to equality among a batch of 70 employees.
It was dismissed in limine as time barred without going into merits which was specifically mentioned in order.
An appeal under 226 was filed before division bench of high court and was dismissed, however the application filed before CAT was rendered not to be barred by limitation but ultimately the appeal was dismissed.
Can I move a fresh petition under article 32as the matter was never adjucated upon by any court with complete pleedings and full contest on merits?
anshul sangal
29 November 2010 at 13:23
I need case law in which drowning is not accident.Insurer died due to drowning in river. Insurance claim is given by the LIC but insurer family is claiming accident benefits.
Dear Sir,
As our Suit is very old of the year 1948, which is still pending in Final decree proceedings from 1986,
We had approach high court regarding one Interlocutary Application in the same FDP when it was dismisssed in trial court, Then our Writ petition was also dismissed by the High court,
but we requested the Judge to direct the trial court to finish of FDP in 3 months, The honorable judge did so by mentioning in the order some 1 year back.
But, Now the trial court Judge is asking us to write for extension of time to High court and not letting us to file any new Interlocutary application,
as the suit is very complex and minimum it requires another 1 year and more to finish.
Question: Can we write or approach high court seeking extension of time for our trial court FDP case, How to proceed through lawyer or cn parties do it.
Anup Hadgaonkar
29 November 2010 at 11:09
How to file suit for recovery of money.
give me a proper provission under which act i can file the suit for recovery of money
As unable to clear the debts a doctor arranged a partnership deed (not registered but under notoriety) in his industry and collected back the instruments and there was no mention of the said collection of the same in the said deed.
However, there is a word the amount so arrived at as at...etc. Moreover, the said agreement is not valid since, he alone discharged the same whereas in 1/3 of the same belongs to his wife yet, it is on the sole proprietorship.
The said deed also commands the title partnership cum power of attorney to sell the same for a cut of amount of 21 lac for which it hardly goes.
The creditors have sued them in the court of law for recovery of money based on the partnership deed. After three years, the opposition lawyer objected to as if it is unregistered hence not maintainable.
What is the recourse. Yet it is noteworthy that they have not sued him over the business of the said firm,property business and bill but on other contract bill of the cheat is attached.regards vaidya can come on vaidya.keshav@gmail.com
harivanshsai
28 November 2010 at 20:44
Can misc. applications filed before division bench of high court be challenged before supreme court through SLP, seperately?
harivanshsai
28 November 2010 at 20:41
How to file an application of recusal of a high court judge, if i wish to file a review petition before any other bench on the ground of vitiated proceedings in the main petition?
Can we make a request before Chief justice of High court for such recusal?
What will be the remedy?
I am working on adhoc basis for last 12 years have filed the case against my employer and the petition is pending in the C.A.T Last week my head of office has informed that he had received the communication from the employer that I shall not be permitted to work in the Office as I was not given further adhoc extension. I asked for the copy of the order but I was refused and advised that I should contact the administration of my employer .I send the letter but I received no reply
Before the Hon'ble bench of CAT, I filed the petition in the form of Miscallneous Application pleading to make stay on the verbal directions given to me. But the bench didnot entertained my plea and informed that on verbal directions such order cannot be passed. The counsel of the respondents too admitted that that there was no such order
But in reality there was an order which was not given to me but has been informed verbally and the counsel may not be awre of the recent updates
What remedy should I have to adopt in such circumstances