Anonymous
27 July 2010 at 22:57
Iam an industrialist and had become the managing director of a public limited company by acquiring shares. Am I bound to obey the decreed judgement which had occured during the earlier management period. The case is that a thrift co-op society has given loan to the company workers and that the management is responsible deducting the loan from wages and remit to the bank on monthly basis. It is learned that the MD had given some undertaking and failed to remit the recoveries. The co-op bank has filed a case against the management under civil and the MD had expired and the case had decreed. What are the options available and is there any option of re-opening the case. Decreed in 1986.
Anonymous
27 July 2010 at 22:01
We are manufacturers of Packaged Drinking Water situated our Industry at Andhra Pradesh. and we got some reputed brand user agreement Andhra Pradesh Territory (non-exclusive basis) at 2007 April 23 renewal date at 2010 April 22nd. we are waiting for renual. the brand owner simply passing time'like wanted to discuss new terms and conditions' now they are telling simply already agreement lapsed, some others alredy got it. and one more news we got, that is they are given some others, same brand user agreement at 2009 March now only they told me. now what can be posible. we are invested huse amounts in this industry with their specifications. now we are struggling so much. how i can get neual? is there any posiblities. the brand owner cheated me.
here with attached agreement text.
Durga
27 July 2010 at 18:10
We are manufacturers of Packaged Drinking Water situated our Industry at Andhra Pradesh. and we got some reputed brand user agreement Andhra Pradesh Territory (non-exclusive basis) at 2007 April 23 renewal date at 2010 April 22nd. we are waiting for renual. the brand owner simply passing time'like wanted to discuss new terms and conditions' now they are telling simply already agreement lapsed, some others alredy got it. and one more news we got, that is they are given some others, same brand user agreement at 2009 March now only they told me. now what can be posible. we are invested huse amounts in this industry with their specifications. now we are struggling so much. how i can get neual? is there any posiblities. the brand owner cheated me.
Anonymous
27 July 2010 at 18:03
We are manufacturers of Packaged Drinking Water situated our Industry at Andhra Pradesh. and we got some reputed brand user agreement Andhra Pradesh Territory (non-exclusive basis) at 2007 April 23 renewal date at 2010 April 22nd. we are waiting for renual. the brand owner simply passing time'like wanted to discuss new terms and conditions' now they are telling simply already agreement lapsed, some others alredy got it. and one more news we got, that is they are given some others, same brand user agreement at 2009 March now only they told me. now what can be posible. we are invested huse amounts in this industry with their specifications. now we are struggling so much. how i can get neual? is there any posiblities. the brand owner cheated me.
Anonymous
27 July 2010 at 10:09
Dear sir,
is one person act like managing director for two companies at a time .
Abhinay Kumar Shaw
26 July 2010 at 23:14
My father in law give me a gift cheque of Rs. 50000/- but the cheque become dishonoured. I informed him many times to issue me an another cheque but he doesn't response me.
Can I suit against him under N.I. Act.
Please give me proper ground and provisions under which I can suit the file.
Anonymous
26 July 2010 at 11:50
Hi
Can some one please enlist the legal rights of the distributor against the supplier. Also suugest if there is an act or legal boundation towards the same .....
Anonymous
26 July 2010 at 11:49
Hi
Can some one please enlist the legal rights of the distributor against the supplier. Also suugest if there is an act or legal boundation towards the same .....
padmarao
24 July 2010 at 00:40
Namaste Sir,
In summons case 205Cr.pc says accused may be dispensed from personal appearence.but the court is insisting atleast for appearence for one time.I request you to clarify.my object is how to avoid the presence of accused by filing Spl.vakalath.this is 138 N.I. case.Are there any citations.The accused attended earlier before court twice when magistrate was on leave.
regards
padmarao
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
part payment after dishonour of cheque
a cheque of Rs. 3,60,000/- was dishonoured and part payment of Rs 2 lakh was done from an unknown account.The creditor sends the messege to debtor acknowledging receipt by SMS.The debtor is not in contact now.How to recover the the remaining amount???? is 138 NI applicable???