Anonymous
22 February 2011 at 10:44
Dear Contract law experts,
I have a query on conract law. "A" Domestic indian company and "B' Europian parent company of 'A'. 'A' enter in to a contract for supply of material in to an Indian supplier 'C" under singapore contract act as per advice of European parent company. Now due to dispute at later stage whether indian supplier 'C' can go to indian court despite having entered contract with singapore law. Answer is yest under what provision of indian contract act?
Farhat jahan
21 February 2011 at 21:11
My qualification is B.A.LL.B,Diploma in labour law and I am pursuing Masters in Business law.This is my last year please suggest me which field is good for me for practicing as a lawyer.
Anonymous
21 February 2011 at 16:05
I had reced. a loan of Rupees 200000 (Two Lacs) by cheque One & Half years ago from one of my frnd, after thats i had paid this money in cash in five to six installments.
till now i dont have any sufficient proof in written thts i had paid to him, now he told me thts he can give me the recept in a plane paper not in a stamp paper.
is this a sufficient proof for me thts i releived from my liability.
Anonymous
21 February 2011 at 11:12
i am a trader. We give material on credit to our contractors. But one of my contractors payment is due from aug 2009. he has given me a blank cheque with my company name and sign only. the date mentioned is 27/01/11. my dues are around 7.5 lakhs. can i fill in the amount get the cheque returned and file a criminal case against him. Also if he comes to know and he makes stop payment of the cheque then will my case still fall under the criminal category. please advice me in this matter. thank you
P.C. Joshi
20 February 2011 at 23:15
Friends,
Can anyone please privide a soft copy of CLB petition u/s 186 of the Companies act.
Regards,
P.C. Joshi
Anonymous
20 February 2011 at 18:20
PUBLIC INFORMATION FOR
DEFENDANTS IN DRT
Whereas Judicial Tribunals i.e. Hon DRT and Hon DRAT have been
established under RDDBFI Act for adjudication of claims by Banks,
borrowers are hereby informed that:
1. To separate Executive from Judiciary and to give Judicial Freedom
in adjudication the Hon Constitution Bench of Supreme Court of
India has held in Madras Bar Association vs. R.Gandhi & Union of
India in Civil Appeal 3067/2004 & 3717/2005 Para 56(xiii)…."The
Administrative support for all Tribunals should be from
Ministry of Law & Justice. Neither the Tribunals nor its
members shall seek or be provided with facilities from the
respective sponsoring or parent Ministries or concerned
Departments.” (emphasized)
2. Inspite of the Hon. Supreme Court Constitutional Bench judgement,
Ministry of Finance still maintains administrative control of Hon DRT
& DRAT.
3. The Ministry of Finance officials are Board Directors of Banks who
inturn are applicants in the Hon DRT and at the same time they are
administrative regulators and paymasters of the said Tribunals in
clear violation of separation of Executive and Judiciary as provided
for in the Constitution.
borrowersrightsforum@gmail.com
Farhat jahan
20 February 2011 at 17:55
If I form a pvt Company with my friend and we keep a clause in our artical of association that we can transfer our share to our relatives only and I transfer my share to my husband.My husband is a working Professional in a IT company than after transfer he has to switch off his job or he can work continuasly.what he has to do after getting share of the company?
Anonymous
20 February 2011 at 11:51
Can the verdict of Ombudsman appointed under Sec 42 of the Act be challenged in any Court/Tribunal.
VENKATA RAMANA MURTY INGUVA
20 February 2011 at 11:22
We are Contractors and due to dispute - Railway has appointed 3 member Arbitration Pannel for solving the problem.
However, they conducted two meetings and could not come to an judgement. After 2 meeting and after lapsing of 8 months no futher meeting are carried by them and not responding to our letters for the same and delayig the case further. In this circumstances what will be the course of action will be taken by us to solve the problem.
Your valuable reply is appreciated.
Further The apex court also disapproved the practice of bureaucrats appointed as arbitrator, being frequently transferred resulted in delaying the arbitration. How to proceed to change bureacrat arbitrator to be replaced by Court Appointed Arbitrators. Than you.
Thanking you.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Payment of Graruity Act
I am a partner in a partnership firm.there are 17 employees works in my shop,. I Wants to Know That Payment of Gratuity Act Applied or not on my Firm.if Yes what is the requrement related for this