G Parthasarathy
21 April 2011 at 16:38
Pls suggest the difference and its importance of Memorandum of Understanding and Memorandum of Articles.
Rajneesh Madhok
20 April 2011 at 22:10
To April 20, 2011
http://164.100.72.12/ncdrcCauselist/causelist/1245causelistPunjabKapurthala2011-04-20.html
The Hon’ble President,
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,
Kapurthala.
SUB: ATTENDED TWO HEARINGS BUT NAME NOT IN CAUSE LISTS AND NO DETAILS OF FURTHER ADJOURNMENTS.
Sir,
I attended hearings twice before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum but all the two hearings have not been mentioned in the cause list. I request to the Hon’ble Registrar to upload the specific information regarding cause list and other matters of decision and adjournments of hearing with reference for reasonable cause.
Details Appellant Respondent Date of hearing Attended before Decision
Attendance marked. Rajneesh madhokCase No. 305/4-4-11Rajneesh Madhok Vs Suwidha Centre SDM Cum Licencing Authority Cum overall incharge of Suwidha Centre, Phagwara and ors. First hearing attended on 15th April 2011 Hon’ble Madam Smt. Shashi Naranag Adjourned to 20th due to non completion of quorum for hearing (one-third member was present.
Attendance not marked Rajneesh madhok Vs Suwidha Centre SDM cum Licencing Authority & ors. Second hearing attended on 20th April 2011 Before Hon’ble President and member Petition admitted, notices are to be served.
Attendance marked Phool Bahar W/o Sh. Ved Parkash. Case No. 306/4-4-11 Block Development & Panchayat officer Phagwara & ors First hearing attended on 15th April 2011 Before Hon’ble member Smt. Shashi Narang Adjourned due to Non completion of quorum for hearing (one-third member was present)
Attendance not marked Phool Bahar W/o Sh. Ved Parkash Block Dev & Panchayat officer & ors Second hearing attended on 20th April 2011 Before Hon’ble President & member Petition admitted, notices are to be served.
No Name entered in cause list No Evidence of hearing attended. No name entered in cause list Attendance not marked
Cause List tagged on the entry gate of the Forum Different from the cause list uploaded. No entry of name in cause list uploaded Name entered in the cause list at the entry gate
Cause of action Not mentioned Not in record Details should be uploaded.
Sir,
I the petitioner and Authorised Representative in one case approached this court by filing petitions under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and got the dates of hearing by post and to confirm the date of hearings, there is no mention in the cause list of Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kapurthala. The Cause list tagged at the entrance of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kapurthala and uploaded on website are different. I submit as under:
1. In the absence of the said information the Petitioner/ Complainant in spite of serving of notice may be doubtful for the date of hearing.
2. On record there is no details/ Reference about two hearings attended by the Complainant/ Authorised Representative.
3. No details of admission of application, Rejection of application and on search by name there is no access to the particular information if feeded by name.
4. Kindly upload the requisite information for the convenience of the public which is mandatory under Proactive Disclosure under Right to information Act, 2005.
5. As the cases are pending in the consumer court, the remedy to seek relief from higher courts only be sought with the provision of appropriate record. In the absence of above mentioned record the further remedy can not be sought.
6. Kindly make instructions for effective functioning of the consumer forum. In the absence of proper record the appellant can not approach to the High Court or The State Information Commission to seek directions in these cases.
7. In absence of the above Proactive Disclosures of Hearings and Cause lists the complainant can not approach the National Commission at Delhi for directions.
8. The time bound relief that the consumer forum has to function and the cases should be disposed off expeditiously can not be considered in the absence of cause lists.
Kindly upload the above mentioned information on the website for the convenience of the complainants and respondents.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
Rajneesh Madhok,
B-xxx/63, Nehru nagar,
St. No. 2, Railway Road,
Phagwara-144401 (Pb)
Ph: 01824-262569 (O), 268210 (R) 094173-06415 (M)
Tele-fax: 01824-262569, E-mail: rmadhok_pgm@bsnl.in; rajneesh_madhok@yahoo.com
=========================================
Kindly suggest what should be done when there is no entry in the cause list of hearings of consumer Disputes redressal forum, kapurthala, Punjab
Husne Mubarak
20 April 2011 at 13:27
Dear Experts,
In a company limited by shares, is there any difference between share-holders and members of that company?
with Regards.
Anonymous
20 April 2011 at 02:25
Can a call deposit receipt issued for tender and not used for tender/remain undelivered be cancelled at the request of the tenderer at the Bank without discharge of the department in whose favour it is issued? Like Govt Deptt a/c XYZ. Can XYZ get it cancelled from Bank solely?
Anonymous
19 April 2011 at 20:09
The qu. asked is nt clear as to d organisation u r working in..cos one can do
tens of part tym job bt a public servant is nt allowed 2 do so
kalpana21sara@gmail.com
19 April 2011 at 19:06
Can I continue my employment in one organisation and open a part time business?
Are there any legal complications?
G Parthasarathy
19 April 2011 at 13:19
Need to know whether any law professor available in chennai to teach correspondence students. If yes, need to contact them on urgent basis for business law subjects. thanks
Anonymous
19 April 2011 at 11:35
Sir, request to know whether i will be able to get a professor in chennai for doing my mbl thru corres
Anonymous
18 April 2011 at 16:28
Unlike a company, which has a separate legal entity, a HUF has no separate existence from its members. A HUF cannot be treated as a person (though under the Income Tax Act, the terms 'person' includes a HUF also for limited purpose only). However, what would be status of a Partnership Firm in which a HUF (and not KARTA) is shown AS one of the Partner? What would happen to credir facilities provided by Bank to such Partnership Firm and what is the remedy?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138 N.I.Act
what should be the meaning of 'legally enforceable liability'