Ravindra Pande
14 April 2012 at 13:10
How to seek additional time from High Court- Mumbai for payment to MHADA once the consent terms period has expired without altering the financial implications of the consent terms?
VANDANA
13 April 2012 at 14:41
before starting business issued three blank cheques to company filling name of company without date and amount,but taken no receipt.after that i issued cheques as per invoice.when i heard company going to close his branch office and head office of delhi.i didn't give his 50000/- due to warranty issue, because warranty is going on.now company has presented one of my security cheque which i given 2 year back filling amount 250000/- whereas due is 50000/-.i have statement of company till 10/10 wheras i have done business till 12/10.i am in secunderabad and company has sended me summon from delhi.when he presented cheque at a time i email to MD regarding balance due and misuse of cheque but they not given reply.what i have to do.company person whom i given cheque ready to write on paper that these are security cheques.cheque whatever i have given against invoice all serial no are after security cheque serial no.what i do now.
Kvijay12345
13 April 2012 at 11:40
What is the proportion ratio to demand for a compensation against the loss in consumer forum?
R.K. Agarwal
12 April 2012 at 19:50
I have an HUF Account in NSDL DP also the karta my father deceased on 29/10/2011. The share holding in DP id is over 10 lakhs.The DP is asking for competent court order or deed of partition to trasmit the shares to next karta.
SUNAD
12 April 2012 at 18:44
Dear all
The query is regarding statutory audit of a co-operative housing society limited. The stat audit is conducted of the society and the financial statements have been approved in the AGM of the society. The auditor has given a true and fair view to the financial statements. After this can a shareholder of the society raise a doubt on the view expressed by auditor by directly communicating to him?
arijit
12 April 2012 at 16:41
Dear Members,
This is regarding the 2 below-mentioned compounding of offence application under Companies Act, 1956:
1. Under section – 297(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, which is to be dealt in Regional Director’s office.
2. Under section - 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 read Accounting Standard – 18, which is to be dealt in Company Law Board.
Now, does the Compounding Application under section – 297(1) needs to be made by the Company + all Directors(including non-executive directors) + Company Secretary OR is it only to be made by Company + MD + WTD + Company Secretary?
Further, does the Compounding Application, under section - 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 read Accounting Standard – 18 needs to by the Company + all Directors (including non-executive directors) + Company Secretary OR is it only to be made by Company + Directors who have signed the Balance-sheet + Company Secretary.
Further, what is the maximum amount of Penalty under both the compounding applications can be levied/ imposed to each applicants? [Provided in both the above cases, there is no Manager u/s – 2(24) of the Act]
Kindly provide your useful comments in this regard, its very urgent.
Thanking you all in advance.
Regards
Arijit
Abhi Sharma
11 April 2012 at 20:27
I would be highly obliged if someone can provide me with a well drafted petition for recovery of dues to be filed before DRT. although i have already drafted the petition as per the format but a nice draft might be very helpful in my belief.
SANDEEP GONDALE
11 April 2012 at 14:58
Dear All,
My query is this that, whether
We can file a recovery suit for outstanding payment, if the Acknowledge of bill misplaced.
We have correspondence regarding of follow up with party/customer, agreement, related bills of certified. Please help by guidance of any legislations/precedent.
Rajesh Solanki
10 April 2012 at 22:56
hello
I want start a small finance company so need to know all the legal step that i have to follow. pls help me ..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Settlement of pending dues to an extent of 3.69lkhs from the company
I have been the stockists/dealer for wipro consumer care and lighting since 22years. schems/discounts offered by sales personel of company has not been comepnsated. Rejected bulbs has not been replacd. Un ordered items have been sent forcibly repeatedly taking the advantage of D.D. that I use to give in advance as they were requesting assuring settlement of claims. The company sales personel have failed in marketing the pending stcoks so sent. Hence the same has been returned to company along with rejected bulbs. Due to this amount to an extent of 3.69lakhs is pending from the comapany. Now rigouresly I am persuing with company to settle claims.Now,sales personel not only stopped requesting for D.D. and also not responding to my letters. Under such circumstances I am under the feeling that, the company staff have cheated me for acheiving target to please their higher authorities. In this regard, I need experts suggetsion to proceed stagewise.