Kuldeep
07 March 2014 at 12:16
I was assigned a work order to complete the civil work of bathrooms for indusland bank.The final bill for Indus land Bank Site was submitted on 16/09/2013.I did many things in that given time frame which were not even a part of the provided work order, just because I have always enjoyed good faith in the company.I was assured that my rates will be passed once the work gets competed for the additional work items. When I have submitted the final bill, the company officials are making unjustified cuts on the rates, which were told to them in prior when the work was going on. The rates have been approved in the running bills but in final bills the cuts are made.
Now they are imposing a penalty of 2.5 lacs saying the quality of work is inferior.
They have blocked my payment for almost six months and now they are coming up with lame excuses to deduct my payment. Though no prior notice was given talking about inferiror quality of work in six months after the completion.
My leftover stock is lying unattended in their store which amounts of lacs,I have told them repeatedly to get it opened they threten that they will not let me take my stuff too.
Kindly help.
Kuldeep Singh
Hi Sir/ Madam,
What are the legal formalities to be complied with for opening beauty parlour in chennai?
Thanks in advance
hetalsangoi
05 March 2014 at 12:18
what are the section are applicable to qty which is expressed in unit.?
what are the laws are applicable to it ?
what are the mandatory disclosure are required to print in the product ?
KARTHIK
04 March 2014 at 18:33
Dear sir this is karthik from lexicoon i have started a new company but i don't know how to maintain the records and finance
please help me out in this issue
naimesh
03 March 2014 at 18:32
In business, Buyer issued Performa Invoice to seller. In Terms and Conditions, Buyer Specified the Clause as SUBJECT TO H.O OF BUYER’S( City name of Buyer H.O) JURISDICTION ONLY. After that claim is arise between parties. How to decide the jurisdiction in this case.
Navin Pandya
02 March 2014 at 06:59
Dear Legal Experts
Namaste!
Kindly advise:
Anand Mahindra, CMD, M&M Ltd. guilty of following:
1) He was fined Rs. 50,000 (fifty thousand)by Bombay High Court for importing Yacht without valid import licence.
2) He violated 'Stay' granted by Industrial Court by terminating two officers of the company. M&M Officers Association filed criminal complaint in Labour Court & he was produced in the Court. Subsequently, the matter was settled out-of-court.
In view of the above, is Anand Mahindra disqualified as CMD of the Company?
Best regards,
Navin Pandya
KIRAN
01 March 2014 at 13:27
Please guide me on this.I have a client where his company is a electrical company and also it want to get engage with share trading.Whereas its main object clause of memorandum only talks about electrical business.I want to insert another object clause as SHARE TRADING.The said company is a PRIVATE LTD.I want to draft a resolution. Can anybody suggest me for same..Thanks in Advance
I'm grateful if any one clarifies my following quarry:
Is it compulsory taking a Trade License U/Shops & Establishment Act by an Educational Institution (college / school / university)which has hostel facility (charging for food+shelter) i.e Residential school/college.
Greetings All,
I want to register organization under companies 1956 act so will you confirm me the procedure how I can register with mentioned below particulars.
What the expanses will be come
What are the capital is required (current money and land)**
What are the document & affidavit needed
How much time will take to register in Delhi.
From where it will be register Domestic/High Court
Regards
Lalit Kumar
Cheque
An agreement contains a clause that disputes arising between the parties shall be resolved amicably at the first instance. The post dated cheques issued by the party taking loan for re-payment of loan by way of instalments are bounced and the other party issues notice to that party under negotiable instrument act for payment. Will this notice be treated as resolving the dispute amicably.
Please opine.