Adv M.D.Azhar
15 November 2014 at 17:52
sir. One client came to me, his problem is that he sent a courier from gujarat to someone who is residing at calcutta. After a few days when he asked a person to whom courier was sent so he denied that i have not received parcel which u sent me. so my client went to the branch and he said above thing to him. so they inquired and then after he give the contact detail of the calcutta branch, where my client inquired so the replied that yes we received your parcel but it is misplace by us. That is been told on the phone to my client, docket no also given to my client. Now they are saying we can not do anything about this. my client also given a written complain to them yet. no reply so what remedy i have, value of the parcel is about 10-15,000/-. Weather i can make a complain before the police station? or is there any other remedy?
hdshardik
15 November 2014 at 17:16
what is the formality require to complete when company can not bring paid up capital within time . eg company is formed on 11-11-2013 what is the last date of bringing the paid up capital. what are the procedure of consequences as of this . what is the last remedies on it . who is required to intimate to Company law board?
chandru
14 November 2014 at 19:43
Hello sir, In partnership firm Should the retired managing partner name be removed from the sub-registrar office document and from patta doc. in revenue records?
Parul Bhayani
14 November 2014 at 17:37
Sir ,
My relative was a director in a firm from 2002 to Oct 2010. A loan was taken from a Nationalised bank in 2009 , during which as a director , have given personal gaurantee for the loan . The loan was used purchase machinery which is still with the company . After resignation , a new director had been appointed and registered with ROC , form 32, also the bank was intimated alongwith a copy of the form 32. Now if the company defaults in its repayments , is he still liable to the bank as he had given a personal gaurantee. Can the bank issue any notice to him ?
HARSH
14 November 2014 at 13:00
Dear Sir,
I want to change the Designated Partners in existing LLP which is Registered in Mumbai with Capital of Rs 100,000
Please guide me through the process -
Further, Deed of Admission is required to be executed or Whole LLP Deed shall be executed afresh ?
Further, If only deed of admission is required to be executed, then How ?
It is to be printed on Legal Paper and Franking should be done or not ?
And if franking is to be done , then of how much Rupees
Further, after franking, stamp duty is also to be paid ?
If yes then how much ?
Please help.
navin
13 November 2014 at 18:58
i am holding a moneylending license in karnataka.my query is people leave (vehicle possesion)there bikes & take loans from me,few days back the registrar of money lending officer told that lending money by pledging vehicles doesnt come under money lending act.please let me know what license to be taken to pledge the vehicle with us where vehicle possesion is with us so that no future hurdles come in future.
Ankur Agrawal
10 November 2014 at 19:29
A partnership fir was formed with 3 partners A, B and C in 1991.The firm was reconstituted on 1 April 2012 as one partner expressed his retirement. Now the retired partner is claiming his capital .How to get rid of such claim .
Manish
09 November 2014 at 13:19
Hello,
If the contract for a franchise is done on a letter head of the franchiser and not on any stamp paper, is it valid in the court ? what if either party breaches it, can it be a taken to the court/arbitrator in Mumbai.
Thanks,
Manish
arindam das
08 November 2014 at 13:54
Hello,
Kindly advise which book to follow for Companies Law and ROC related work. The book should be easy to follow and preferably in a single volume.
Thank you.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Revenue documents clarification
Hello sir, In our partnership firm First there were a two managing partners and five partners so the patta was issued in the name of two managing partners only not in the name of the company.
Later one managing partner retired from the partnership.so,now my question is should the retired managing partner name be removed from the patta doc?
OR Is it a mistake of the revenue department to issue a patta in the name of managing partners instead of the firm?
In the Encubrance certificate there are three claimants entry. The first entry is "Name of the Managing partner-1",the second entry is "Name of the Managing partner-2" and third entry is "partners of the firm" generally on whole not mentioning other partners name individually.
Initially There were two managing partners and five other partners totally seven .
The land purchase document was signed by two managing partners then.