Rajneesh Madhok
20 April 2011 at 22:10
To April 20, 2011
http://164.100.72.12/ncdrcCauselist/causelist/1245causelistPunjabKapurthala2011-04-20.html
The Hon’ble President,
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,
Kapurthala.
SUB: ATTENDED TWO HEARINGS BUT NAME NOT IN CAUSE LISTS AND NO DETAILS OF FURTHER ADJOURNMENTS.
Sir,
I attended hearings twice before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum but all the two hearings have not been mentioned in the cause list. I request to the Hon’ble Registrar to upload the specific information regarding cause list and other matters of decision and adjournments of hearing with reference for reasonable cause.
Details Appellant Respondent Date of hearing Attended before Decision
Attendance marked. Rajneesh madhokCase No. 305/4-4-11Rajneesh Madhok Vs Suwidha Centre SDM Cum Licencing Authority Cum overall incharge of Suwidha Centre, Phagwara and ors. First hearing attended on 15th April 2011 Hon’ble Madam Smt. Shashi Naranag Adjourned to 20th due to non completion of quorum for hearing (one-third member was present.
Attendance not marked Rajneesh madhok Vs Suwidha Centre SDM cum Licencing Authority & ors. Second hearing attended on 20th April 2011 Before Hon’ble President and member Petition admitted, notices are to be served.
Attendance marked Phool Bahar W/o Sh. Ved Parkash. Case No. 306/4-4-11 Block Development & Panchayat officer Phagwara & ors First hearing attended on 15th April 2011 Before Hon’ble member Smt. Shashi Narang Adjourned due to Non completion of quorum for hearing (one-third member was present)
Attendance not marked Phool Bahar W/o Sh. Ved Parkash Block Dev & Panchayat officer & ors Second hearing attended on 20th April 2011 Before Hon’ble President & member Petition admitted, notices are to be served.
No Name entered in cause list No Evidence of hearing attended. No name entered in cause list Attendance not marked
Cause List tagged on the entry gate of the Forum Different from the cause list uploaded. No entry of name in cause list uploaded Name entered in the cause list at the entry gate
Cause of action Not mentioned Not in record Details should be uploaded.
Sir,
I the petitioner and Authorised Representative in one case approached this court by filing petitions under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and got the dates of hearing by post and to confirm the date of hearings, there is no mention in the cause list of Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kapurthala. The Cause list tagged at the entrance of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kapurthala and uploaded on website are different. I submit as under:
1. In the absence of the said information the Petitioner/ Complainant in spite of serving of notice may be doubtful for the date of hearing.
2. On record there is no details/ Reference about two hearings attended by the Complainant/ Authorised Representative.
3. No details of admission of application, Rejection of application and on search by name there is no access to the particular information if feeded by name.
4. Kindly upload the requisite information for the convenience of the public which is mandatory under Proactive Disclosure under Right to information Act, 2005.
5. As the cases are pending in the consumer court, the remedy to seek relief from higher courts only be sought with the provision of appropriate record. In the absence of above mentioned record the further remedy can not be sought.
6. Kindly make instructions for effective functioning of the consumer forum. In the absence of proper record the appellant can not approach to the High Court or The State Information Commission to seek directions in these cases.
7. In absence of the above Proactive Disclosures of Hearings and Cause lists the complainant can not approach the National Commission at Delhi for directions.
8. The time bound relief that the consumer forum has to function and the cases should be disposed off expeditiously can not be considered in the absence of cause lists.
Kindly upload the above mentioned information on the website for the convenience of the complainants and respondents.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
Rajneesh Madhok,
B-xxx/63, Nehru nagar,
St. No. 2, Railway Road,
Phagwara-144401 (Pb)
Ph: 01824-262569 (O), 268210 (R) 094173-06415 (M)
Tele-fax: 01824-262569, E-mail: rmadhok_pgm@bsnl.in; rajneesh_madhok@yahoo.com
=========================================
Kindly suggest what should be done when there is no entry in the cause list of hearings of consumer Disputes redressal forum, kapurthala, Punjab
Husne Mubarak
20 April 2011 at 13:27
Dear Experts,
In a company limited by shares, is there any difference between share-holders and members of that company?
with Regards.
Anonymous
20 April 2011 at 12:10
i have issue 4 post dated cheques total amounting Rs 10 lakh to a company along with Rs 5 lakh as a cash as an security. On returns company provides me stock and gives us fix monthly commision. But from last 1 year company is not cooperating with us and neither provides us stock nor our commision. Now the position of the co. is too bad and we have no faith on them so we wants to stop payment on post date cheques, so what is the legal procedure as still we have 1 year agreement left. After stopping payment can company took any action on us. Plz help urgently.
Anil Kr Garg
20 April 2011 at 09:44
Pubic Sector Electricity supply company has a claim from a company in MP for minimum charges for over a year which are disputed by the company due to rejection of relief under force majeure clause.
The company is now left with no assets as factory has been transferred and under Power supply code, SupplyCom is barred from demanding these dues from new owner who leased land from govt specifically.
Now, SupplyCom is also armed with powers of Tehsildar under Land Revenue Code 1959 (Madhya pradesh) who has given notice u/s 146 to two directors personally for recovery.
I believe that company dues cannot be recovered from directors personally unless there is a specific law to that effect (because company is a separate entity from directors and this does not change even if demand is from a government company).
Kindly advise if the Tehsildar could really proceed against the directors or their private property?
Situation is in Madhya Pradesh
Anonymous
20 April 2011 at 02:25
Can a call deposit receipt issued for tender and not used for tender/remain undelivered be cancelled at the request of the tenderer at the Bank without discharge of the department in whose favour it is issued? Like Govt Deptt a/c XYZ. Can XYZ get it cancelled from Bank solely?
Soma
19 April 2011 at 23:59
To foster better industrial relations, directors of AB. Ltd. agreed with its trade union to offer 1,000 shares of Rs. 100 each full paid up, to it employees and to receive amount thereon in ten equal installments of Rs. 10/- each.
Can the company make such an issue?
What is the legal provision is this regard?
Can any one help?
Anonymous
19 April 2011 at 23:30
Hi,
Could someone provide me with all or any of the following:-
(a) A draft application under Section 560(6) of Companies Act for reviving a company whose name has been struck off by the registrar.
(b) Details regarding jurisdiction of the court in which such application would be made, when the registered office of the company was in Ghaziabad (U.P.).
(c) Details regarding Court fees for such application in such court.
Thanks
Anonymous
19 April 2011 at 20:09
The qu. asked is nt clear as to d organisation u r working in..cos one can do
tens of part tym job bt a public servant is nt allowed 2 do so
kalpana21sara@gmail.com
19 April 2011 at 19:06
Can I continue my employment in one organisation and open a part time business?
Are there any legal complications?
G Parthasarathy
19 April 2011 at 13:19
Need to know whether any law professor available in chennai to teach correspondence students. If yes, need to contact them on urgent basis for business law subjects. thanks
Two hearings attended but no entrance in cause list.
To April 20, 2011
http://164.100.72.12/ncdrcCauselist/causelist/1245causelistPunjabKapurthala2011-04-20.html
The Hon’ble President,
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,
Kapurthala.
SUB: ATTENDED TWO HEARINGS BUT NAME NOT IN CAUSE LISTS AND NO DETAILS OF FURTHER ADJOURNMENTS.
Sir,
I attended hearings twice before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum but all the two hearings have not been mentioned in the cause list. I request to the Hon’ble Registrar to upload the specific information regarding cause list and other matters of decision and adjournments of hearing with reference for reasonable cause.
Details Appellant Respondent Date of hearing Attended before Decision
Attendance marked. Rajneesh madhokCase No. 305/4-4-11Rajneesh Madhok Vs Suwidha Centre SDM Cum Licencing Authority Cum overall incharge of Suwidha Centre, Phagwara and ors. First hearing attended on 15th April 2011 Hon’ble Madam Smt. Shashi Naranag Adjourned to 20th due to non completion of quorum for hearing (one-third member was present.
Attendance not marked Rajneesh madhok Vs Suwidha Centre SDM cum Licencing Authority & ors. Second hearing attended on 20th April 2011 Before Hon’ble President and member Petition admitted, notices are to be served.
Attendance marked Phool Bahar W/o Sh. Ved Parkash. Case No. 306/4-4-11 Block Development & Panchayat officer Phagwara & ors First hearing attended on 15th April 2011 Before Hon’ble member Smt. Shashi Narang Adjourned due to Non completion of quorum for hearing (one-third member was present)
Attendance not marked Phool Bahar W/o Sh. Ved Parkash Block Dev & Panchayat officer & ors Second hearing attended on 20th April 2011 Before Hon’ble President & member Petition admitted, notices are to be served.
No Name entered in cause list No Evidence of hearing attended. No name entered in cause list Attendance not marked
Cause List tagged on the entry gate of the Forum Different from the cause list uploaded. No entry of name in cause list uploaded Name entered in the cause list at the entry gate
Cause of action Not mentioned Not in record Details should be uploaded.
Sir,
I the petitioner and Authorised Representative in one case approached this court by filing petitions under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and got the dates of hearing by post and to confirm the date of hearings, there is no mention in the cause list of Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kapurthala. The Cause list tagged at the entrance of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kapurthala and uploaded on website are different. I submit as under:
1. In the absence of the said information the Petitioner/ Complainant in spite of serving of notice may be doubtful for the date of hearing.
2. On record there is no details/ Reference about two hearings attended by the Complainant/ Authorised Representative.
3. No details of admission of application, Rejection of application and on search by name there is no access to the particular information if feeded by name.
4. Kindly upload the requisite information for the convenience of the public which is mandatory under Proactive Disclosure under Right to information Act, 2005.
5. As the cases are pending in the consumer court, the remedy to seek relief from higher courts only be sought with the provision of appropriate record. In the absence of above mentioned record the further remedy can not be sought.
6. Kindly make instructions for effective functioning of the consumer forum. In the absence of proper record the appellant can not approach to the High Court or The State Information Commission to seek directions in these cases.
7. In absence of the above Proactive Disclosures of Hearings and Cause lists the complainant can not approach the National Commission at Delhi for directions.
8. The time bound relief that the consumer forum has to function and the cases should be disposed off expeditiously can not be considered in the absence of cause lists.
Kindly upload the above mentioned information on the website for the convenience of the complainants and respondents.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
Rajneesh Madhok,
B-xxx/63, Nehru nagar,
St. No. 2, Railway Road,
Phagwara-144401 (Pb)
Ph: 01824-262569 (O), 268210 (R) 094173-06415 (M)
Tele-fax: 01824-262569, E-mail: rmadhok_pgm@bsnl.in; rajneesh_madhok@yahoo.com
=========================================
Kindly suggest what should be done when there is no entry in the cause list of hearings of consumer Disputes redressal forum, kapurthala, Punjab