STUDENTS OF ALL AGES ARE SERIOUSLY APPEARING FOR EXAMS FROM MARCH TILL JUNE EVERY YEAR.
BUT DUE TO SUDDEN TRAFFIC JAM DUE TO UNEXPECTED PROBLEMS AND OTHER UNFORESEEN PROBLEMS HAVE TO STRUGGLE HARD TO REACH THE EXAMINATION CENTRE IN TIME.IN CASE THEY REACH LATE THEY ARE PREVENTED FROM APPEARING THE EXAMS WHICH RESULTS IN LOSS OF ONE YEAR FOR THE CONCERNED STUDENTS.STUDENTS ARE FUTURE OF OUR INDIA,THE CONCERNED GOVT.AUTHORITIES AND EXAMINATION AUTHORITIES SHOULD CONSIDER THESE PRACTICLE DIFFICULTIES AND FIND SOME WAYS TO HELP SUCH INNOCENT STUDENTS WHO SHOULD NOT SUFFER FOR NO FAULT ON THEIR PART.PROPER STEPS SHOULD BE TAKEN BY ALL CONCERNED TO HELP STUDENTS.PLEASE COMMENT AND GIVE SUGGESTIONS FOR P.I.L. BEST REGARDS TO ALL.
Dear Experts,
Please suggest me what are the methods to develop drafting and vetting skills
sir iam(10+2 completed) pursuing ca ipcc, doing articleship.. but at the same time i want do llb 5 years degree simultaneously ,,,, so, is there any collges offering this course correspondence or (part time). . what are they in hyderabad.. please advice me how should i go about... thank in advance ..iam waiting for reply
Sir
Plz tell me the good university for doing LLB Correspondence (Academic).I am from state of Punjab.Is there any benefit of it ?
I am a CA final Year student.I would like to know that on the basis CA I would be eligible to pursue LLB or not. Please do reply..
Atmaram & Sakharam are the defendants in the suit filed by their brother Tukaram for declaration that sale deed between Atmaram & Sakharam and one Vijay Jadhav in respect of the part of his ancestral property is not binding upon him & for partition . After filing WS, defendants now want to seek an amendment in written statement & want to insert a paragraph about the gift deed executed by defendant’s mother to the defendant’s prior to institution of suit.
Ref: Order VI Rule 17 or CPC We have to Defend this case plz suggest
The plaintiff filed suit against the shopkeeper and the company who manufacture TV on the ground that the TV supplied by the shopkeeper has some defect and not giving performance as claimed by the company all such defects have occurred during the period of one year from the date of purchase or within the period of its guarantee & the plaintiff prayed to the Hon'ble Court either to refund the price of TV along with interest thereon from the date of the purpose or in alternative, replacement of a TV of the same make.
it is the case of the defendant No 1 that whenever he received the complaint in respect of the TV the experts have attended all such complaints within the period of guarantee and the last complaint made by the plaintiff is after expiry period of the guarantee and therefore the defendant no 1 is not bound to either refund the amount of TV or to replace with a new TV of the same make.
it is the case of the defendant no 2 that the defendant no 1 never referred the complaint of the plaintiff to them and therefore it is the liability of the defendant no 1 in the event of the decree in the matter.
I need some facts of arguments for Moot Court Exam in Collage which is on 4th March 2011 please guide me on this
In this case we have to choose the party for argue plz suggest
Dear Advocates!
Can anyone let me known about the current status of AIBE in the Apex Court?
Thanking you
Regards
V.Sundaresan,
Advocate.
sir
plz tell me how can i tax calculation of dowry asset. i was got a dowry asset & i sold it after 4 year how much will i take cost of aquisation of this type assets when i calculation ltcg
Patent agent examination
Dear sir,
I want know about the scope as patent agent.
when its notification would issued.