Selvam chennai
30 October 2013 at 11:47
The Spreme Cour decided to grant oral hearing to the Centre and other petitioners who had sought a review of its July 18 majority (2-1) verdict that had quashed the notification for National ligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET).
A review petition is normally decided in chamber proceedings without giving an opportunity to parties concerned to argue the case.
What is different between hearing in "open court" and Chamber
sagar
26 October 2013 at 12:49
what is the opportunity in govt. job for tax advocates ??
pratibha
25 October 2013 at 16:17
i belong to general category. and the person whom i love belong to obc category .shall we be able to get reward of 50,000 after our marriage?if no then how much reward will be given to us by government?
surinder
24 October 2013 at 18:01
respected all
a student complete two degrees simultaneously from two different universities. In this way he/she is registered in both the universities.is there any way to cancel one university registration..? or student want registration of only one university ..plz assist on this topic...
JEGADEESAN
22 October 2013 at 21:58
Dear Sir,
Is it possible to change anything in TM Application for registration of Trade Mark after submission of the same to the registering authority?
Id yes what is the procedure?& which form should be used?
gopal
17 October 2013 at 09:22
Dear Respectable experts,
I am from chennai
My advocate is going to file vakalat on behalf of me on State consumer commission. we have paid some amount to him, but i would like to know the details ,our counsel not telling the detail ,he tells that do not worry i will look it
now i want to know the detail that
On filing vakalat,
What are the stamps to affix in vakalat?
How much amount to affix in each stamp?
On filing the counter statement,
What are the stamps to affix?
How much amount to affix in each stamp?
kindly provide the information
Thanks and regards
gopal
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Claim for damages of breach of contract
In 2005 FCI invited offers from land owners for construction of plinth and other facilities for storage purposes and after construction to lease to FCI on rent for three years. I submitted offer. After negotiation, my offer at negotiated rate was accepted and agreement on 1.6.2006 was entered into giving details of terms on which I agreed to lease out plinths after construction under lease agreementto be executed between the parties in the prescribed performa. Time was essence of the agreement and in case of delay in construction and faulty workmanship, FCI was not bound to take plinths on lease. I borrowed loan from bank and raised construction. FCI took possession on 12.01.2007, but served notice of vacation on 14.09.2008. I filed suit for breach of contract. Main defence of FCI is that in absence of of registered lease deed the parties were not bound by the period of lease as the agreement was unenforceable and in absence of valid agreement. tenancy was month to month and liable to be terminated under section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, and hence I cannot claim damages?????