Dhruv Sinha
05 November 2013 at 08:53
What is the difference between colleges accepting LSAT and colleges taking admission on graduation marks for 3 year LLB course.
karan hareshlal lund
03 November 2013 at 16:45
PLEASE PROVIDE ME LAST 3YEARS QUESTION PAPERS OF LAW 1ST SEMISTER (SUBJECTS : CONTRACT,LEGAL LANGUAGE, TORT, LABOUR) IN PDF FORMAT
Selvam chennai
01 November 2013 at 15:37
I am already passed +2 but can't joined MBBS at Tamilnadu, since I have taken 3 marks less than other students, my cut off is 193 out of 200. Now I could not try in the next year, since Taminadu admission is on Mark Basis. Also NEET was abolished by Supreme Court. If NEET (Common entrance) is compulsory, I can try and join in the Next year.
Chennai High Court granted green signal in 2007 to Tamilnadu Government, ensure admissions purely on the basis of the marks obtained in the +2 examination .
Chennai High Court granted green signal in 2007 to Tamilnadu Government, ensure admissions purely on the basis of the marks obtained in the +2 examination .
In all States, if not scored good mark in the first time we can try in next time whereas at Tamilnadu no more opportunity. In all states, all students are having opportunity to try in next time except at Tamilnadu.
Whether I can approach Supreme Court for Entrance at Tamilnadu. I am from middle class family.
Whether my approach is correct or not? Please guide to conduct lawyer in low budget to approach Supreme Court.
Charan2513
31 October 2013 at 12:55
Hello experts this is charan.. my friend have a problem with his ssc certificate.His original sur name is bollaram.Kiran kumar.
Instead of that Gadila.Kiran kumar was printed on his SSC certificate. Due to that he is not able to study higher studies.So many times we asked my headmaster in my school (ZPHS m.Turkapally) but he is not helping us. Even 2days back we went to the Board Of SSC. but there also we did not got any kind of valuable information.
please provide a suggestion.
regards
charan2513
Guri Sidhu
30 October 2013 at 12:10
In 2005 FCI invited offers from land owners for construction of plinth and other facilities for storage purposes and after construction to lease to FCI on rent for three years. I submitted offer. After negotiation, my offer at negotiated rate was accepted and agreement on 1.6.2006 was entered into giving details of terms on which I agreed to lease out plinths after construction under lease agreementto be executed between the parties in the prescribed performa. Time was essence of the agreement and in case of delay in construction and faulty workmanship, FCI was not bound to take plinths on lease. I borrowed loan from bank and raised construction. FCI took possession on 12.01.2007, but served notice of vacation on 14.09.2008. I filed suit for breach of contract. Main defence of FCI is that in absence of of registered lease deed the parties were not bound by the period of lease as the agreement was unenforceable and in absence of valid agreement. tenancy was month to month and liable to be terminated under section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, and hence I cannot claim damages?????
Selvam chennai
30 October 2013 at 11:47
The Spreme Cour decided to grant oral hearing to the Centre and other petitioners who had sought a review of its July 18 majority (2-1) verdict that had quashed the notification for National ligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET).
A review petition is normally decided in chamber proceedings without giving an opportunity to parties concerned to argue the case.
What is different between hearing in "open court" and Chamber
sagar
26 October 2013 at 12:49
what is the opportunity in govt. job for tax advocates ??
pratibha
25 October 2013 at 16:17
i belong to general category. and the person whom i love belong to obc category .shall we be able to get reward of 50,000 after our marriage?if no then how much reward will be given to us by government?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Regarding practice
Hi,
I'm Rajesh from Trichy. Now, I'm doing my 1 B.L(3years course) and my ambition is to become a prominent lawyer in India and I've an idea to do my practice in supreme court. Basically, I'm from a village and also doing my course government college. I thought these things shouldn't become drawbacks of me and I've to overcome them. I've to compete with guys from prominent law schools. Here I need an advice for career.
What are the things I've to keep in mind to become a prominent lawyer during my course? (like case studies)
I need a guidance also if you keep in touch with me really I won't forget you in my life time.