Gaurav Agarwal
12 November 2012 at 00:45
My friend had car which was registered in the state of Gujarat later he was transferred to Hyderabad in the state of Andhra Pradesh (A.P). He did not take any NOC/permission from RTO in Gujarat or A.P.
One night his car was stolen from the open parking near his house.
What should he do now to get his insurance claim? He is worried that insurance company will not give his claim because he was using the car in AP? Please help.
HEMANT DANDEKAR
11 November 2012 at 21:30
Sir,
Whether a copy of Agreement of sale of a member / flat of a CHS can be demanded / procured under RTI Act from the society or the Registrar of co - op society.
Ashley Anthony
11 November 2012 at 13:18
Dear Sir/ Madam
I had taken a loan of 2,25,000.00 on the Credit Card with EMIs from Citibank for 36 months. I have regularly and without delays paid up 26 EMIs with interest. I am presently without work and was unable to pay further and my financial state is very bad. I asked the bank for a settlement and was ready to pay 30,000 to close the card and loan but the bank agents keep calling and harassing me for payments. I finally asked them for an a/c statement to show how much I have paid till date when finally realized and noted that I have till the month of June'12 paid up to Rs3,00,000.00 and more. Please could you tell me if it is still required that I pay the Bank more money. I feel I have paid the Bank more than what I have taken and its just that they are not ready to settle and want more. I am worried that they do not send collection agents or goons to collect money from me. Is there a way out? I feel I made a mistake by telling them I will pay 30,000. Now I dont want to pay this after I checked my statement noting I have paid more. Please tell me what I can do to close this issue.
Thank you.
Ashley Anthony
Pune
deepak garg
11 November 2012 at 12:46
Dear sir
can the respondent ask the petitioner to furnish details lik
BALA GOPAL. S
10 November 2012 at 21:10
what is the evidenciary value of a new paper item published in a new paper, when it is not a hearsay evidence
Abhinaya
10 November 2012 at 12:44
Dear Members,
Need reference of Lawyer in Mumbai dealing in
Food Adulteration Act & FSSI.
If you know any, pl let me know.
Regards,
deepak garg
09 November 2012 at 18:32
Dear sir
i have filed a petition for eviction of tenant from shop.the suit property is in reghar pura and has three floors ,ground,first and second.first and second floor are lying vacant as they are residential in nature.And im am residing in other property at ramjas road.
in leave to defend respondent has mentioned about my residential property(ramjas road) as commercial property.this property was residential but presently this area has been passed as commercial.but i am residing there on first and second floor with my family.i have ration card on that address and electricity metre is also domestic.will it have any adverse effect on my case.
deepak garg
09 November 2012 at 18:20
Dear sir
i have filed a petition for bonafide requirement of tenanted premises which is a shop.presently i am unemployed.In leave to defend respondent has mentioned about a plot as commercial/industrial plot situated in mundka.
This plot is owned by me ,it is an industrial plot but presently it is lying vacant.
will it have adverse effect on the case.
Balaji Radhakrishnan
09 November 2012 at 17:16
My name is balaji, I did my LLB 3year course in KSLU in 2009-2012 batch, my age was 34 years at the time of admission, now I submit my application in state bar council of tamilnadu for enrollment, my application is hold after all verification for the reason of age limit but my frient in 2008 batch his age is 44 years but his application is accepted and He enrolled, kindly clarify this,
thanks in advance
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Drc act 1958 section 14 (1)(e)
Dear sir
in petition i filed that i required shop for pvc pipe trading/bussiness.previously i was doing the manufacturing of pvc pipes from my premises at mundka,but due to heavy loses ,i had to shut the manufacturing plant of pvc pipes.
The respondent in his leave to defend mentioned that the said business of manufacturing of pvc pipe is a flourishing bussiness and i am indulge in the same bussiness.
But it is not true,however i dont have any documentary evidence to proof it.
Respondent had also not produced any documentary proof.
will it have any effect on the case.
ld judge has given next date for arguments on the application for leave to defend.