LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Raj   16 April 2015 at 20:47

Construction defect in newly purchased home

Hello All,
I had brought a newly constructed house in January 2015. My complaints are as following

1. There were a lot of finishing touches to be made like tiles cleaning, Blocked Plumbing, Filling up of wall cracks ( commonly called 'air cracks' is what I was told), which I had to complete on my own expense.

2.I had been promised that two bore wells were in working condition, but after I had taken possession of the house, only one was working.

3. On 13th April 2015 when there were unseasonal rains the Side walls were seeping water from the cracks.

Before I speak to the builder I would like your esteemed advise.

Thank you

Raj

Anonymous   16 April 2015 at 13:46

right way to proceed

Ek ladki ki shadi hoti hai use har tarike dhej ,gharelu hinsa sahni padti hai use uske ma baap se milne na diya jae paanch saal k baad vo apne apne ghar aakar sasural jane se mana kar de and uske important educational certificate ladka dene se mana kar de to ladki kya kare

ashok   15 April 2015 at 21:20

C/c by passenger

Indian Railways Catering Tourism Corp (IRCTC) a fully owned subsidiary of Indian Railways conduct package tours (bharat darshan). The package includes, train journey, sightseeing, lodging boarding etc. In a recent concluded tour the train was delayed and reached the first destination of tour by more than 14 hours with the result the whole tour thereafter was adversely affected. Apart from it, there were other deficiencies /lapses. In One of the T&C, it is mentioned that I RCT shall not be responsible for delay of train. Whereas, it seem train was delayed deliberately to avoid night stay in hotel /lodges. Under these circumstances, do the District consumer Forum, have jurisdiction to hear complaint against Railways.?

Chetan Vyas   15 April 2015 at 19:19

Requirement of license u/r.gujarat poisons(regulation and control of sale and use of acid)rules,2014

Hello Sir,

The Govt. of Gujarat has recently published Gujarat Poisons(Regulation and Control of Sale and Use of Acid)Rules,2014. We are using some of the poisons, as mentioned under schedule-I of the said rules, in very small quantity in our laboratory for chemical checking purpose. But we are not selling any kind of poison as specified in the scheduled-I of the said rules. My query is that as per rule 4 of the said rules, whether we require to take license for possession of poisons in our laboratory. Because as per rule 4 of the said rule only sell or possession for sale any poison specified in the schedule-I requires license.

Regards,
Chetan Vyas

hemant   15 April 2015 at 15:01

Kids caste

hi ,
i am Hindu married to Muslim girl, now we have 1 daughter and by birth she is Hindu, but i want that she follows Muslim religion so can we change her caste to Muslim.
what is the process .. and community certificate is used for the same

amit   15 April 2015 at 00:41

138 ni act jurisdiction

X, a resident & works for gain, having office at Agra, moves a complaint U/S 138 NI Act against Y (living at Delhi & Office at Pitampura, Delhi.), who issued and send a Cheque vide Speed Post to X at his Agra Office. When X presented Y’s Cheque for encashment to his Banker at Agra, his Cheque got bounced. (All the formalities like sending demand notice, filing of complaint and issuing notice has been done according to limitations and well on time). Thereafter, two summons have also been issued to Y but he did not appeared at Agra Court. Further, Bailable Warrant has also been issued, but Y still not appeared.
In the meantime, on hearing, the Magistrate refuse to hear the complaint on pretext that some new ruling/citation ‘Dashrath Rup Singh Rathore … Vs … State of Maharashtra & Anr.’ has been delivered by Supreme Court, according to which jurisdiction in Cheque Bounce matter lies at Delhi since Y resides at Delhi. So, Magistrate is passing order to transfer the same to Delhi Court. As per the said latest Citation of Supreme Court.

Q1. – Where the Jurisdiction shall lie according to new Supreme Court case law.

Q2. – Does this new citation of SC of 138 NI Act, applicable to the above said situation, where Bailable warrant has already been issued to the accused? (and Y still not appeared on date)

Q3. – Where the Jurisdiction shall lie? According to latest Law/Ruling of Supreme Court. Whether it lies in Agra or in Delhi?

Q4. – What is the time period, if Magistrate is willing to order the Complainant to transfer the Complaint to Delhi Court for account of Jurisdiction?

Q5.- Can Magistrate transfer the said case in between, if Bailable Warrant has already been issued to accused?

Q6. – Does the new ruling ‘Dashrath Rup Singh Rathore … Vs … State of Maharashtra & Anr.’of SC says that if Bailable Warrant has already been issued then also the complaint is liable be transferred to Delhi Court?

Member (Account Deleted)   14 April 2015 at 22:25

Departmental inquiry

1. Whether regular hearing can take place every day basis and if not then how may days gap is admissible?
2. If a charged govt servant alleges bias against the inquiry officer after 3 1/2 months but he has not followed proper channel and has directly sent his request to reviewing Authority.and the inquiry officer & the disciplinary authority are informed by the reviewing authority to stay the proceedings then what options are left with the inquiry officer?

SAM   14 April 2015 at 20:40

Duties and responsibilities of a seal bailiff

Sir,
Please can any one clarify the duties and responsibilities of a Seal Bailiff and Summon Bailiff in District Courts with proper G.O. orders or memos etc.?

amitsakate   14 April 2015 at 16:23

Spelling mistake of first name in caste certificate and caste validity

Respected,
sir/madam,
my name is amit which is mentioned on all may documents like 10th and graduation and other documents but on my caste certificate and caste validity certificate it will be ameet it is a spelling mistake. I made an affadavit for that problem like these two names are not different persons they will be same and correct name is amit from 10th certificate In the front of executive magistrate.
I will selected in bank exams this will create any problem during document verification. My caste certificate is 15 year old please suggest any solution for that problem.

jyoti   14 April 2015 at 10:39

Rti

I have asked for an information regarding discrepancy of marks in promotion interview from GM of the Bank.But he has sent it to the CPIO of the Branch. As the Branch was not dealing with the matter,they may refuse to give answer.What is the solution? The matter was being dealth with by GM