Anonymous
21 October 2009 at 22:21
Is there any time limit for conducting auction by the bank after taking possession of the property under sec 13(4)0f SARFAESI ACT? How long can the bank charge interest after taking possesseion ? Can they charge interest after taking possession and not conducting auction till 4 years?
Anonymous
21 October 2009 at 20:11
hi im new lawyer i wanted 2 no how i can do inspection of a case in which im neither 4m accused nor 4m state side but i wana see the file of Avnish Bajaj Vs. State (N.C.T. Delhi)
case judgment is done in fav. of Accused. actually i need state,s point of view in that case for my son who is doing Law 4m NLU pl. if any one can help me
Pramod Kumar 'Guddu'
21 October 2009 at 14:20
We are having two manufacturing unit one is 100% EOU & anther is Non-EOU and both are availing CENVAT. Non-EOU is transferring some (Electric Cabales) goods to 100% EOU with payment of Excise Duty. There are two questions:-
(1) Non-EOU procured cables with paid excise duty at the time of purchase and if they are transferring can they charge Excise duty at the time of transferring/dispatch goods to 100%EOU.
(2) 100% EOU can avail CENVAT against the same.
Please guide us with reference of relevant Notification/Circular.
jahnavi
21 October 2009 at 13:28
sir,
I am 22 years old and my mother and me are willing to build a house in a plot given by my grandfather
in andhrapradesh.Since we had been brought up in a different state I do not know anyone in that place( my father has expired).
We have no own house and do not have any idea about constructing house before.Most of our neighbours are telling that
it is difficult to beleive in most of the contractors since they might cheat and nowadays it is not good to rely on word of mouth.
I do not want to sell the plot due to sentimental reasons.
Can you kindly suggest me how to find a reliable contractor and whom i should approach to take sugession in construction
i.e., if there is some place where we can get the information and guidence about standard contractors and architects.
the plot is in ponnur(guntur district)and also please inform me if I should appoint a lawyer and make agreement with the
contractor.
Priyanka
20 October 2009 at 15:15
Dear Experts,
Please let me know the rate of Stamp duty payable on Deed of Guarantee.
We are advised that as per the latest notifcation in June 2009, it is 0.2% of the Loan Amount. It is mentioned that since there is no Specific mention about the Deed of guarantee in Bombay Stamp Act, it is taken as 0.2%.
Request please clarify on this issue, also give us the rate that is applicable.
Thanks
Priyanka
Mayank Mishra
20 October 2009 at 11:09
Dear Sir, I am buying resale Property in Sanpada,navi mumbai
Registration is done on 16th Sep,09,
being gaonthan plot Society has to sign some document to take CIDCO NOC, and society's people are not signing the papers.
need your help how we can short out the matter,
regards,
Mayank Mishra
Ramkumar R Daga
19 October 2009 at 18:21
Are you aware that there is a Supreme Court order dismissing a Special Leave Petition filed by a Bank against the refund it had to give its client fo such pre payment charges. The Hon Supreme Court observed after hearing both the petitioners that it would not interfere against the order to refund the preclosure charges against the Bank.
In another order a Bank has been asked to refund Rs 64,80,000/- (Yes Rs 64.80 lakhs) collected as pre closure charges from a party WITH Interest till the date of refund of the amount.
My query to the Appellate Authority of Reserve Bank of India, Smt Usha Thorat, in an appeal filed by me, under the RTI Act along with a copy of the Hon Supreme Court order and the directive by the Reserve Bank of India keeping this order in mind is yet pending reply. This appeal was filed about 15-20 days ago. Original query under RTI was filed in August.
Sachin Bhatia
19 October 2009 at 15:16
Ques:Coercion is defined in which section of the Indian Contract Act?
Ans: Section 15
Ques:Undue influence is defined in which section of the Indian Contract Act
Ans: Section 16
Ques: Consent is defined in
Ans: Section 13
Ques: Free consent is defined in
Ans: Section 14
Ques: Misrepresentation defined in
Ans: Section 18
Ques: Fraud defined in
Ans: Section 17
Ques: When the consent of a party to the contract has been obtained by fraud, in such a case the contract is
Ans: Voidable
Ques: A contract to do or not to do something, if some event collateral to such contract does or does not happen” is called
Ans: Contingent contract
Ques:Novation is defined in
Ans: section 62
Ques: Misrepresentation means
Ans: Causing advantage to a person not a party to the contract
Ques: What is meant by ‘Court of Record’?
Ans: The court that can punish for its contempt
Ques: The sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court of India including the Chief Justice of India is
Ans: 26
* In Golak nath case Supreme Court held that Parliament cannot amend the fundamental right
Ques: Dispute regarding the election of Vice President is decided by
Ans: Supreme Court
Ques:The authority to restrict or extends the jurisdiction of the state of High Court rests with
Ans: Governor
Ques: The final authority to interpret the constitution
Ans: Supreme court
Ques: Name the head of a religious math in Kerala who filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court challenging the validity of 24th, 25th and 29th amendments
Ans: Kesavanda Barathi
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
MACT and IPC
Today a one bike rider just hit my 2 vehicle for the back of my vehicle onto this a unacceptable arguments was said by the offender. Although not any damage to occur to my vehicle but a disrespect was hurt to me and I noted the Number of vehicle and afterwards got the address of offender from the RTO office in local district.
Now I am planning to file two cases
1. MACT under S.166 but a problem is that my 2 vehicle was not insured under S.196.
WIll it create problem to get recovery of amount under Sec 184 MACT. without need of FIR. // matter of District judge jurisdiction
OR
In what sections of MACT I'll have to proceed for getting compensation for damage to 2vehicle (while not informing the accident by the offender under S.134 MACT.)
2. A Crl.case of S.279, S.323 and S.506 IPC direct complaint under Sec 190 CrPC. NO need of FIR // matter of C.J.M jurisdiction