Anonymous
08 March 2011 at 02:37
Dear Sir,
The past elected candidates (except the secretary) of our housing society cheated us and elected the new candidates by stating that there was nobody to stand against them. They also made a request in the bank to change the signatures. So my neighbour filled a suit against them.The election was under process (3 candidates which doesn't include a secretary were elected and the rest were about to elect the next week) when the court has given a stay order on the election. The bank was also informed about the stay and they seized the accounts
After that member of the society wrote a letter to the secretary to call a general body meeting. The Secretary called a general body meeting and members in the meeting declared a new election date which was completed according to the law.
Now the problem is that we are not able to operate the bank accounts of the society because the fraud elected candidates are not ready to request the bank to change the signatures.
Please help with a solution by which we will be able to operate the bank accounts soon.
Mohammed Tanveer Mohsin
07 March 2011 at 23:34
Dear All,
Please help,
Can any one give direction in the light of act or any court order for form a governing body for education society.
1. How many member should be minimum and
maxinum
2. Who be the members.
3. Can teachers also be the member of
society.
Please provide with reference.
Because the details are not available in Society registration act. so what should we follow.
Anonymous
07 March 2011 at 23:15
MY HUSBAND WAS INCOME TAX INSPECTOR SINCE 2002, HAVING BASIC PAY OF 6700/- AS ON 01-01-2006 IN PRE REVISED PAY SCALE OF 6500-200-10500.BY 6TH CPC HE WAS GRANTED GRADE PAY OF 4200.0N 13-11-2009, VIDE O.M. 1/1/-IC-2008(COPY ENCLOSED),INSPECTORS WERE GRANTED GRADE PAY OF 4600/- W.E.F. 1-1-06, CORRESPONDING TO PRE REVISED 7450-225-11500.NOW THOSE INSPECTORS WHOSE PAY WAS BELOW 7450/-(FOR EG. 6700/-) IN PRE REVISED BASIC, LIKE MY HUSBAND ARE DEMANDING THAT AFTER OM DATED 13-11-2009, THEIR BASIC PAY AS ON 1-1-06, SHOULD BE FIXED AS 7450*1.86+4600=18460. IS THEIR INTERPRETATION CORRECT.
PLZ RESPOND AS THIS SITUATION RELATES TO THOUSANDS OF INSPECTORS.THANK U.
TR Madhavan
07 March 2011 at 19:50
The NCDRC in its daily order dt:6/9/2010 has informed we respondent to be present before the registrar in March, 2011 for fixing final date of hearing.
I as the authorised person had sent letters to the commission in Dec, 2010 as well as in Jan, 2011, explaining the difficulties and hardship we were put to, by the complainant.
As per the cause list it has been mentioned as 'For completion of pleadings'. Please kindly clarify what I have to do, as such we not in position to appoint a counsel.
Anonymous
07 March 2011 at 18:33
An e-mail communication between two or more persons regarding any matter in a case is an documentry evidence it to produced in court in hard copy of that email.
An e-mail hard copy after print is documentry evidence. So pls. provide the case where the email is a documentry evidence.
Anonymous
07 March 2011 at 17:40
what are the provisions affecting the issue of sending notice on behalf of internation clients .
Anonymous
07 March 2011 at 17:36
Plz.refer me at least one more website details to share and discuss on some legal aspects as like as Lawyersclubindia.om
Anonymous
07 March 2011 at 17:00
In this case my client has availed of a 20 yrs home loan from a bank. when he availed of this loan there was no ecs system and pdc's for 12 months had to be given to the bank.
during one year on account of mis-communication from the bank 2 emi's were missed out. however, a representative from the bank / dsa / collection agency approached my client and collected only 1 emi. my client was not aware that 2 emi's were due.
now 3 yrs down the line since the past 12 months they are harrasing my client and sending him statements amounting to Rs/ 1 lac odd towards interest for non pymt of overdues.
kindly note that the loan has been taken in june 2003, principal amt involved is Rs. 20 lacs and the emi is Rs. 23,000/- so my client is paying Rs.2,76,000/- every year towards the principal and interest. on an average my client has paid the bank Rs. 21,39,000/- till date but the principal outstanding still shows as Rs. 18 lacs.
on asking them for statements, we are not receiving the same but they are religiously sending the reminders for the emi and overdues to be paid and acknowledging the ecs remittances every month.
now my client has paid the overdues under protest with the hope that he can fight it out with them and settle the same towards principal repayment and not as interest on overdues since he was not aware of any dues?
what is the course of action to be taken which can help him to divert his hard earned money towards loan repayment and not as interest as overdues as explained by them?
Kindly advice.
Thanking you.
Anonymous
07 March 2011 at 16:49
One of my client was not satisfied with the internet service provider as such sent them a mail informing them that he is not interested in continuing with their services and as such they should not bill him from the following month - oct 2010 in this case. he has cleared all his bills upto sept 2010 promptly. he has all the receipts for the same.
however, my client is still receiving bills and phone calls regarding clearing the overdues for oct etc (services are not utilised during this period - he has already availed of services from another service provider). after 5 months that is now in feb 2011 they have sent him a letter/notice through a lawyer stating that it appears that there is no intention on the part of my client to make the payment and if he fails to do so they shall be liable to initiate legal proceedings against him. is this possible?
what is the solution for my client in this solution?
kindly advice.
thanking you in anticipation.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Marriage
can i marry a minor girl age more than 15 yrs but below 18 yrs?