Anonymous
12 December 2011 at 11:45
Husband wishes to make a will as given below, kindly confirm the legallity and procedure for execution:
1. If his wife survive after his death, then the will should be read to all beneficiaries but the same will not be executed immediately. The same has to be executed only on death of his wife.
2. Till such time his wife is alive she will occupy the house and do the expenses as required by her.
My query is:
1. Whether such type of will can be made and whether it would be legally correct.
2. She is the joint holder of all the bank accounts and investments, so she can operate the accounts. But as she is not literate enough what precautions should be taken so that she is not influenced by any of the beneficiaries.
please advice....
mukesh Gupta
12 December 2011 at 10:20
Sir(s),
Recently a judgment was delivered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Arbitration cases in which it was held that arbitrator can not give the rates more than the rates under contract. The title of the case is M/s Satyanarayanan vs UOI. I need the citation of the same . I tried to find out the judgment but unabale to get the same.
Thanks.
Anonymous
12 December 2011 at 09:53
What is the remuneration & perquisites of a parshad of nagar nigam in Uttar Pradesh?
Anonymous
12 December 2011 at 05:41
Dear Sirs,
I am a secretary of our society in mumbai since september 2011. Before that the society was managed by one person only as per his own will/wish causing a huge financial and non-financial loss to society. We now have a committee of 7 members.
In performing our duty i/we have to take decision in the interest of the society which may not like to 2-3 individual members. Now the children of those 2-3 unsatisfied members (all above age of 18) has made some shameful commemnt on me on the face book. Fortunately, my daughter was watching the same and has taken the print out of these comments by them. One e.g. of comment is that ' Mr.shah (myself) ki lagani hai kya?' ' Mr.Shah ki itni himmant kahan ke woh hame rok sake? etc.
Can i or managing committee of the society take any legal action against those for making some comment on face book causing a damage to my reputation. If yes, how? Wiil their parents be also responsible for the same. What will be consequences of any such legal action.
Your advise in the is highly appreciated.
Thanks.
sanjay
10 December 2011 at 23:38
one of my friend who is working in the PWD state government office. As per some decisions of State govt he got ad-hoc promotion as a enginner under PWD dept in the Nov 2010 for 11 months without any recruitment Rules. In that 11 months office also not created any recruitment Rules within 11 months. he is qualified person. now state government is reverting back him under old post.
so in the view of natural justice what will be remedy available with him?
can he approch Maharashtra Adminitrative Tribunal against the reversion order ?
is any same case citation is available for ready reference ?
can govt revert him back in the December month i.e after 13 months ? (originally it was for 11 months ??
waiting for the reply soon ....
regards
parkash chand rana
10 December 2011 at 20:58
Is there any authority/ judgement of any court which covers the cases wherein the following proposition falls:-
one accident took place and the driver of the govt bus was booked in the matter and facing trial and his DL was seized and attached in the judicial file thereafter another accident took place by the same driver but this time the DL has already expired but later on the same was got renewed but after the expiry of one month's grace period.
is there any authority which cover this case and saves the driver from his liability to pay compensation to the claimants.
Please mail the same to me if any on the point at my mail address "adv.p.c.rana@gmail.com" or "advocatepcrana@gmail.com" at the earliest.
Rahul Singh
10 December 2011 at 20:18
In one case the court has held the driver of M/cycle liable to 50/% for contributory negligence, but in claim of pillion rider in same matter has not fixed 50% of the above on him holding that he was only a pillion rider not contributing in accident.Whether the approach of the court is correct?Kindly give immediate opinion and judgment also.
Anonymous
10 December 2011 at 17:32
Hello
Some on has file PIL in delhi high court and case is going over their. but people are form Gujarat and documents, Agreements, administration offices & oppression offices are in Gujarat and case agents trust which is Gujarat but delhi high court is ruing this case form last all most 3 years. some party's are suffering due to this PIL and suffering people are also for Gujarat can this case go on delhi high court without Jurisdiction. please Help about this
Regards
Anonymous
10 December 2011 at 16:57
Im a central govt employee and placed under suspension for the reason that a criminal investigation is pending and detained for more than 48 hrs. Charge sheets have been issued byCBI and trial is in progress My suspension has been extended by the authorities for the past 4years after review without stating any reason for such an extension. Representation proved futile. I want to know whether the extention order should spell out the reason for my extention and what remedy I have got to get revoke my suspension. Pl reply urgently
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Arbitration proceedings under "delayed payments to small scale & ancillary indl.act 1993 & amdmnts
In an Arbitration case: details of which are furnished hereunder. Kindly confirm whether my views are correct:
The claimant filed a statement of claim for certain value and for the interest thereon, under “delayed payment receivable” by an SSI Unit. In the statement of claim, they have indicated totally six Invoices raised against six lots of supplies effected on different dates to the respondent company. But out of six (6) invoices, supplies were made against L/C established by the respondent for the partial supplies and three (3) invoices were raised separately. After supplies the claimant negotiated the above said (3) three invoices and received payment through Bank against the L/C terms.
The business relations/transactions between the claimant and the respondent were spread over a period of 4 financial years. The respondent did not pay against certain invoices/supplies as the material supplied by the claimant were defective. Keeping aside the settlement of dispute on defective material value and the resultant loss, the respondent was buying material from the claimant and was releasing payment by means of cheques/DDs/L.C. At times the cheques issued by the respondent were bounced and were made good by issuing fresh cheuqes / DDs in lieu of bounced cheques.
Now when the arbitration proceedings are on, the claimant says that he has adjusted the payments received on first in first out basis viz., against the Invoices which were raised against supplies under L/C terms of payment to those which were payable by the respondent under direct credit basis. Further the claimant in his claim statement showing those invoices which he received payment against L/C as due and claiming interest also.
Also –
An admitted liability is enforceable by law and also obligatory on the part of the debtor to pay the admitted liability to the creditor.
If the creditor admits receipt of payment through an L/C against specific supplies and the relevant invoices how he can again claim payment against those bills in his claim statement filed before an Arbitration Tribunal?
Further to avoid law of limitation for a claim, for a same value of amount against a disputed supply value of earlier bills (for the reasons of defective material), the claimant says he has adjusted the value of L/C value against earlier supply bills as a practice in a running account and now showing the bills paid against an L/C as delayed payment/due.
In my view, as per the accounting practice, unless there is an understanding oral/in writing between the claimant/respondent (creditor & debtor), the claimant can not adjust the amounts received against those bills which he raised against specific L/C with those of other Bills which he raised for supplies under direct credit basis. Please guide me.
Further the claim submitted by the claimant, should not entertained by the Arbitration Tribunal, as the claimant admitted receipt of payment for the bills under an L/C.
Regards.