Jotho Yun
13 October 2012 at 13:57
Dear Sir,
Whether Reservation or Roster will apply for the post having a cadre strength of only 1(one),say, for promotion to the post of Joint Director(Gr-A)as per post based Roster Reservation system.
As per Recruitment Rules of the department,the promotion is to be made from the feeder cadre of 'District Field Officers'by 100% promotion,and the Joint Director is non-selection post.
Recently, the DPC was held,and the names of 2 eligible officers were placed for the promotion to the said post,1 officer from General(Unreserved)category and 1 from Reserved(ST)category.And finally, the DPC has selected the name of General category officer for the promotion to the said post by stating that Reservation or Roster will not apply in case of single(lone)post.
The DPC also stated that,General category officer being a Senior to the Reserved(ST)officer,and promotion is to be made on non-selection basis as per R.Rules.So, the name of general category was selected in the panel for promotion to the post of Joint Director.
Now my questions are -
1).Is it really Reservation or Roster will not apply for the post having a cadre strength of only 1(one)as per Supreme Court Order and Post Based Roster Reservation policy ?
2).What is meant by non-selection Post ?
nagarajupatro
13 October 2012 at 11:48
Respected Experts
Good morning
In the light of agitations opposing land acquisation in West Bengal and U.P, parliament passed a bill making necessary amendments to Land Acquisation Act inrespect of awarding compensation etc., to the benificiary.
Please provide more information in this regard and let me know when those amendments came into force, please give the details of those amendments at the earliest.
Or else please suggest me how can I get the details,
Any senior please attach a file of LA Act amendments in Andhra Pradesh regarding Compensation
What is the procedure is followed in the state of Andhra Pradesh with regard to the compensation to the benificiary, to whome government alloted land 30years back and qcquired in the same recently.
sanjay kumar
12 October 2012 at 21:53
i have passed LL.B. in 2012 & enrolled & now i m practicing as an advocate.please suggest me-
i wanna know what makes a advocate perfect in any area of advocacy or practice?
what must be the best quality in an advocate
not according to books but according to practical?
MURAAREE M
12 October 2012 at 17:57
HAI,
CAN SOMEONE WHO PASS THE LL.B THIS YEAR & ENROLL THIS YEAR & PRACTICE AFTER SOME YEAR,
IS THIS POSSIBLE,
IS THIS AFFECT THE ADVT CARRIER
Alok Goswami
12 October 2012 at 11:35
R/Sir ,
Being an employee of a private firm , I am getting relieved from my services in Nov 12 , I have Rs 12 Lakh amount in my super annuation fund , if I go for guaranteed 5 Years option then please let me know the pension amount which I will be getting on quarterly basis along with its detail of calculation
nagarajupatro
12 October 2012 at 10:04
Respected Experts
Please let me know that when and in which case the Honourable Supreme Court has pronounced judgement to protect the water bodies such as ponds, tanks more particularly used for irrigation.
Please mention the citation and give necessary suggestions
vikram shahi
11 October 2012 at 23:43
I WANT TO KNOW "REGISTERS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN UNDER PUNJAB FACTORIES ACT" IN STEEL ROLLING MILL (MANUFACTURING TMT BARS)
Sanjit
11 October 2012 at 23:19
Sir,
I have saving account in a Nationalised Bank with my mother.Currently there are two STDR. My daughter is nominee of this saving account. Out of Social Pressures / Obligations I'm forced to make a new FD of Rs.1,50,000/- Now the Queries are
1. Can I nominate my niece only for this new FD.
2. If yes, can she (my niece) later challenge the original nominee of the saving account (i.e.my daughter).
3. Does it create complications (at maturity, in case of any miss-happening).
SKS
Atish
11 October 2012 at 21:16
Dear All,
In a pursis of closing evidence because in trial court we were not given time to go to High Court, the application was made by us to the High Court. In the High Court we accepted stating change of mind about closing evidence and said we would accept it. Order was passed by the High Court.
Due to certain circumstances discussed later we decided that we have to actually close evidence in the trial court for reasons.
In this case would it be contempt of Court and in what manner should we put it forward to the trial court.
Regards
Atish
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Rti act-2005
I filled an RTI application, before the MCD property tax deptt., in the capacity of General secretary of RWA and clearly indicate, that I am a citizen of India. My application is rejected, due to the reason since I have asked the information in the capacity of General Secretary. I am not satisifed with this answer since I apart from the my capacity indicated cleary that I am a citizen of India, and the information is required as the RTI act-2005.
Please clarify if there is any clause in RTI-2005, which barred me to receive the information, in the capacity of General Secretary, since a General secretary is also a citizen of India