SHAILESH SAWANT
29 March 2013 at 13:17
We are the members of the society had taken a in our first A G M in the year 2010 that we will not allowed bachelors to stay as from 2004 to till 2010 we have suffer a lot with their drinks, any time in and out, cigarette smoking, loitering in the passage, speaking on mobile in the night sitting on staircase, staying more than capacity in one flat , using space as commercial way any one can come and go.
If all members are agreed in the meeting and by election not one time more than 3 o 4 times then it was not the other members duty is to accept or go for challenge, As we know if any decision passed with majority then every one in the society had to abide by the same.
Can that members sub let his flat to bachelors without obtaining N O C from the society and got the police clearance only
What are the guidelines in the same
kumar
29 March 2013 at 00:57
i need guidance, i did job of chartered accountant in private firm of CA for six month. at the month of november 2012 CA told me to leave job because now he does not have that much work. so he give me cheque of last month salary of rs 20000. but he requested to not deposit the cheque for 3 to 4 days since he donot have money to pay. but since nov 2012 to today , he is continuously giving me next month date to deposit cheque. but this time i got fed up and talk him straight forward for payment my salary. then he refused to give me money and told me go for case.
what should i do?
Siddharth Kamble
28 March 2013 at 23:08
sir i am a common man i just want to know some law abt leave and relation coz i am in live and relation i want to convert it in marrage but my partner is not ready for the same and she threatend me to file case against me if i will not be in live and relation with her could u pl help me
rakesh
28 March 2013 at 20:02
dear sir, an retired govt employee (Mr.X)has two wives both are own sisters.Elder sister is also govt employee, died in a road accident in Jan 2007. Mr.x got the family pension of deceased wive from Jan 2007 onwards. In March 2008 Mr.X retired and started receiving pension from said month. In the month of Nov'12 bank intimated that family pension of Mr.X be stopped to given by Mr.X pension dept and all the sum received as family pension be recovered from Mr.X pension on the ground that Mr.X got remarried. Because of one of the clause in family pension sanctioning letter was family pension will be given until the date of remarriage or death whichever is earlier to Mr.X but Mr.X got married deceased wife sister before her death by taking the consent of deceased wife of which document was filed with employer of deceased wife. Mr.X also intimated about the sister of deceased wife as nominee with his employer 8yrs back. So my question is whether what the pension department has done recovering family pension from Mr.X's pension is right under the clause of remarriage. Mr.X didn't received any notice of his pension be stopped and family pension recovered but such notice was sent to the banker only. My opinion is as Mr.X got second marriage before the death of deceased wife so the clause of remarriage will not apply and if the clause is applicable pension dept should stop giving family pension and shouldn't recover from Mr.X as the default lies on pension dept. because after proper verification only it sanctioned family pension to Mr.X and he already stated his second wife as nominee with his employer before the death of the deceased wife..So please suggest me whether Mr.X is eligible for family pension or not and whether family pension can be recovered from his pension and whether second wife who's name is mention in PPO eligible for family pension after submitting required documents with the employer.
MD JAMAL MUSTAFA
28 March 2013 at 02:43
WISH U HAPPY HOLI TO ALL THE LCI MEMBERS
A does the business from fifty years to sell the CAMEL without trade licence any where in INDIA from RAJASTHAN. Now A has to need trade licence what is the process to apply the trade licence and by which manner trade licence could be issued. where wil be apply for trade licence. trading of CAMEL is illegal
shyam
28 March 2013 at 01:52
dear sir/madam,
one of my clients gave a cheque on giving him some service from our company.
the cheque was bounced citing reason " cheque payment stopped "
again we presented the cheque in the bank and it was returned with
same reason.
the cheque again bounced citing reason " cheque payment stopped "
i have spoken to some lawyer and he told me that in case of " stoppage of payment by the issuer of the cheque , the same cheque can not be represented again in the bank as per N. I. act 138, AND NOTICE CAN NOT BE SERVED, UNDER NIA 138 for second stoppage of payment, and cheque bounce if "payment stopped by issuer " of cheque is the reason of cheque bounce.
where as PER my knowledge ,the final supreme
court rulings ( in MSR LEATHER CASE ) ( negating the previous supreme court verdict in sadanand case )the apex court has clarified that with every cheque bounce fresh notice can be given and that the cheque can be presented any no.of times till the validity of the cheque, and fresh cause of action arises on every representation of the cheque which has bounced, and thus a fresh notice can always be given on every time cheque bounced or stop payment done by issuer of cheque.
pls clarify this matter.
DOES IT REALLY AFFECT THE CAUSE OF ACTION A S PER NIA 138,
2. I HAVE GIVEN NOTICE TO THE CHEQUE ISSUER ALONG WITH MY LAWYER , CAN 2 SIMULTANEOUS NOTICE CAN BE GIVEN FOR ONCE BOUNCE CHEQUE.
3. I M CLARIFYING THAT WE HAD NOT GIVEN any NOTICE , ON FIRST TIME BOUNCE OF CHEQUE , BUT REPRESENTED THE CHEqUE IN ThE BANK second time on request of cheque issuer , AND ON SECOND BOUNCE ( STOP PAYMENT ) , i along with my lawyer have sent a legal NOTICE under sec 138 nia.( two different notice, one from my side and one from my laywer side for the same cheque on second bounce.)
.
IS IT LEGAL to send two notice bounce of the cheque
J B Goel
27 March 2013 at 14:36
i am retired officer.i want to do business in uk and for this purpose, i want to remit GBP 2,10,000 in my name to uk. pl advise the procedure
j b goel
Kushal
26 March 2013 at 23:27
Hi Friends...,
Please tell whether Companies Act, 1956 is applicable to Corporations...?,
because as per my knowledge they are governed by their respective/different acts.
So, whether Company Law is also applicable, with the respective acts under which they have been made?
Regards,
Kushal Kumar
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Urgent!! appropriate forum??
I am confused as to where the following petition should be filed. Please guide me. Whether the appropriate forum is the AFT or some high court??? The synopsis goes like this..
The petitioner herein was recommended by the 11 Services Selection Board at Selection Centre East, Allahabad for 120 NDA course (Batch No. ANDA 61838-A, Chest No. 06) being All India Ranked 35 for AirForce and 88 for Army/Navy in the year 2008. After being recommended by the Service Selection Board, Allahabad he was sent to AFCME ( Air Force Central Medical Establishment ), New Delhi for medical examination where he was declared unfit showing the deformity ‘Hallux Valgus’ meaning the inward deviation of the big toe. Being aggrieved at declaring him unfit, he submitted an appeal before the Appeal Medical Board for re-examination of his medical fitness where also without taking anX-ray of his toe, he was declared unfit. The X-ray is essential to determine the degree of deformity. The petitioner again approached theReview Medical Board where although an X-ray was taken but here he was declared unfit without providing him the reports. Having made up his mind for himself for appearing other defence services examinations like University Entry Scheme and Technical Graduate Courses, he started pursuing B.Tech degree and alsounderwent NCC training. Right before applying for these examinations, he decided to gethimself examined regarding his deformity and accordingly he was examined by an orthopedicspecialistwho deducted from physical examination of the petitioner’s feet that he was totally fit and the percentage ofdeformity of his HalluxValgus was very minor and advised him to get the exact percentageof deformity from the Air Force medicalauthorities. After having known thathe was medically fit and the purported action of the Medical Boards, the petitioner submitted applications under RTI Act seeking information about the findings of the Medical Boards and the acceptable standards in case of his deformity before therespondent authorities on various occasions. Though they provided him with the Medical standards, they never supplied the exact required information regarding his rejection to the petitioner. Later, the petitioner got his feet examined by a Reg Medical practitioner and obtained a certificate stating that the degree of deformity of his feet isRight=10 o and Left=10 o . The economic condition of the petitionerturning against him, he joined the Indian Air Force as an Airman on29-09-2010 and underwent training for almost a year and a half. The petitioner, managing time from the busy training schedule, submitted a representation on 20-04-2011 before the respondent authorities for restoration of hiscandidature for 2008 batch of 120NDA but the respondent authorities in a most illegal and arbitrary manner without considering the facts and circumstances of the case, intimated the petitioner vide a letterdated 03-06-2011 referring to a speaking order dated 20-08-2010 that the instant speaking order addresses all the grievances of the petitioner. Subsequent RTI applications fetched no satisfactory responses. The petitioner even submitted an application in Aug 2012, through proper channel, to theCommanding Officer of 43 Squadron,his parent unit, for forwarding to appropriate authorities. The application got ‘trapped’ in the channel itself for months and even before it could be presented to the commanding officer, the petitioner was asked either to modify the content or to withdraw the application. The application is still held with the unit orderly room. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed a writpetition WP(C) 595/2013 on 31-01-2013 in the Hon’ble Gauhati high court seeking justice but the Hon’ble court found it to be outside their territorial jurisdiction. The said petition was disposed of on withdrawal with liberty to the petitioner to approach before the appropriate forum