Darius Engineer
22 March 2018 at 23:09
1. Can a witness to a will be an executor of the will ?
2. Can the beneiciary also be an executor of the will ?
3. Does a will necssarily have to have an executor ?
Darius Engineer
Anonymous
22 March 2018 at 11:51
Hi Experts,
My wife filed 498a on my entire family and relatives and then forced us for a divorce (only 3 months into marriage). We agreed to her demands but then she went to her native place and after two months filed DVA and maintenance cases demanding 5 times the money that she had asked initially.
I filed for a Cr.TP in the SC and that took two years to be decided with wife not responding and just taking time and dragging the case. It became ex-parte but they some how managed to bypass 2 -3 benches and finally landed on a bench which had a lady judge from her state.
As expected the transfer was rejected and awarded in favour of the wife even though they never filed a response, the lady judge was so determined to block it, my word, I can't explain. She gave the reason as inconvenience to the wife which never got into the official orders. The official was a bull shit to read but who can question them? Some of them feel they are GODS.
Now, I filed RCR in my City (no Divorce filed before) and as usual no reply from her for months and it became ex-parte again on the day before an order is given, she gets a stay order from supreme court just like that. The same was not provided to us for the DV transfer case which was Criminal case and we were taken for a ride for close to two years for bull shit judgement.
Now, I will get a notice from SC for the transfer of this RCR case soon. When I can't get a criminal case like DV transferred to the place of allegations especially when there is a 498a already I have no hopes that the SC will reject her transfer petition for RCR case. Every advocates sympathise with us and tell that is how it is in this country. The SC is a Women welfare organization rather than a court of justice in these matters.
The SC has absolutely no regard for merits and establishing justice. It just looks at whether the petitioner is a man or a woman and if it's a women it is super advantage.
Now, I don't want to spend money and time on this losing course fighting to retain RCR in my City. I have very well understood how SC decides the transfer. Men have no chance for either criminal or civil cases getting transferred. We are literally at the mercy of the complaining women.
I want to know whether I can respond to the notice my self some how by send a post or email or their online services etc.
Are men being at the mercy of the women and the system the only way forward? I have given up and my fighting spirit is wading faster and her demand has gone increasing.
Some times I think whether men should take up arms and turn rogue to get justice and then suffer which is much more satisfactory at least. But unfortunately men have their families who are also bound in these false cases which blocks many men from turning into murderers.
GOD SAVE MEN IN THIS COUNTRY.
Vinod Kumar Soni
21 March 2018 at 20:01
महोदय
मैंने बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया द्धारा कराई गई ई -नीलामी से दिनांक 30/03/2016 को मिर्ज़ापुर शहर में एक रिहायसी मकान जिसका रिज़र्व प्राइस बैंक द्धारा रुपया 1102000/- हजार तय किया गया था पर मैंने सबसे ज्यादा बोली बोलकर रुपया 1317000/- हजार में बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया से क्रय किया और दिनांक 08/042016 को सारा रुपया जमा कर दिया एवं बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया ने दिनांक 26/05/2016 को मेरे नाम रजिस्ट्री भी कर दी, नीलामी में भाग लेने से पहले बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मिर्ज़ापुर के तत्कालीन मुख्य प्रबंधक श्री मयंक जैन एवं जोनल ऑफिस के विधि प्रबंधक श्री दिनेश सिंह जो वर्तमान में भी हैं ने कहा था कि रजिस्ट्री के 15-20 दिन के अंदर जिला मजिस्ट्रेट से परमिशन लेकरके आपको आपके द्धारा क्रय किये गए मकान पर भौतिक कब्ज़ा दिला दिया जायेगा इसी क्रम में बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया ने धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत दिनांक 12/05/2016 को भौतिक कब्ज़ा लेने हेतु जिला मजिस्ट्रेट न्यायलय में अपील दाखिल किया इसी बीच चांदतारा देवी गारंटर जो कि संजय गुप्ता ऋणी की माँ हैं एवं बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया ने गारंटर चांदतारा देवी के मकान को नीलामी करके मुझे बेच दिया, चांदतारा देवी को पता चलने पर उन्होंने बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया के खिलाफ दिनांक 03/06/2016 को DRT allahabad SA दाखिल कर दिया जिसका फैसला आज तक नहीं हुआ परन्तु DRT allahabad से कोई इस्थगन आदेश नही था,इसी बीच बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मिर्ज़ापुर के मुख्य प्रबंधक श्री मयंक जैन का ट्रांसफर हो गया,बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मिर्ज़ापुर के पैनल अधिवक्ता द्धारा मुक़दमे में कोई पैरवी न करने एवं तारीखों में उपस्थित न होने के कारण न्यायलय अपर जिला मजिस्ट्रेट मिर्ज़ापुर के यहाँ से बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया द्धारा दाखिल मुकदमा दिनांक 22/03/2017 को अदम पैरवी पे वाद खारिज़ हो गया इस प्रकरण की शिकायत मैंने बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया के विधि प्रबंधक श्री दिनेश सिंह से कि तो उन्होंने बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मिर्ज़ापुर के वर्तमान मुख्य प्रबंधक मो० सहाबुद्दीन ने पैनल के दूसरे विद्धान अधिवक्ता श्री सुरेश सिंह के द्धारा न्यायलय जिला मजिस्ट्रेट मिर्ज़ापुर के यहां पुनः संपत्ति पर भौतिक कब्ज़ा लेने हेतु वाद संख्या D-2017165303369/2017 जिसपर सुनवाई के उपरान्त न्यायालय अपर जिलाधिकारी मिर्ज़ापुर ने दिनांक 24/08/2017 को अपने आदेश में यह लिखा कि नगर मजिस्ट्रेट जनपद मिर्ज़ापुर को यह निर्देशित किया जाता है कि निर्दिष्ट एसेट जिसका उपर उल्लेख किया जा चूका है पर कब्ज़ा लेकर बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मिर्ज़ापुर के अधिकृत अधिकारी को हस्तगत करा दें एवं पुलिस अधीछक मिर्ज़ापुर कब्ज़ा लेने के लिए नगर मजिस्ट्रेट जनपद मिर्ज़ापुर को आवश्यक पुलिस बल उपलब्ध करायेंगे, इस आदेश के बाद बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मेरे प्रकरण में न जाने क्यों शिथिल पड़ गई मेरे बार बार अधिकारियो से मिलने पर बैंक के विधि प्रबंधक श्री दिनेश सिंह जी ने दिनांक 06/12/2017 को नगर मजिस्ट्रेट मिर्ज़ापुर को न्यायालय अपर जिलाधिकारी मिर्ज़ापुर के आदेश की प्रति के साथ कब्ज़ा दिलाने हेतु पत्र लिखा जिसपर भी नगर मजिस्ट्रेट मिर्ज़ापुर ने पुलिस बल के साथ संपत्ति पर कब्ज़ा दिलाने के लिए 11/01/2018 की तारीख तय कर दी परन्तु बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मिर्ज़ापुर के किसी अधिकारी/अधिवक्ता ने किये गए आदेश को रिसीव करने में रूचि नहीं दिखाई और दिनांक 09/01/2018 को अचानक बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया मिर्ज़ापुर के वर्तमान मुख्य प्रबंधक मो० सहाबुद्दीन की तबियत ख़राब हो गई और वो वाराणसी इलाज हेतु चले गए,
महोदय मेरे प्रकरण को दो साल हो गए हैं और बैंक आज भी इसी तरह से हीलाहवाली कर रहा है मुझे उचित सलाह दें कि मुझे इस प्रकरण में क्या करना चाहिए
सादर
विनोद कुमार सोनी
9415206590
vinodsonimzp@gmail.com
Suresh kumar
21 March 2018 at 17:18
My friend is a trademan in BSF. He joined Bsf in 2005, He filled a form for SI deppt exam in 2012, He passed written for S I . Deppt Exam in 2012. after it he was passed by PST board in Height weight and Chest, means Physical Standard Test, after it he passed PET, means physical efficiency test, after it he was called for Medical, in Medical he was declared medical unfit in lessHeight, He was already passed by physical board before the medical, in remedical he was again declared medical unfit in lessHeight, Doctor can not declare medical unfit to any candidate in Medical test. No any rule in Medical science related it, MHA also made rules about it in 2015,
If doctor is liable for offence under ipc section 166
If Doctor work is Ultra vires
Plz guide or help
Anonymous
21 March 2018 at 16:05
Respected Sir. First of all , i am happy to find your site professionally connected and well done.
Well, Can you please give your expert legal opinion on the following :
a) On the issue of shoe racks kept outside the main entrance door of a flat in a tower occupying around 5 sqft only and not of any hindrance to the neighbor also and who does not mind for the said usage ?
b) What if the same passage is encroached by other flat owners in each floor of the same tower. Around 50 sq ft and the passage is being extended as the front entrance door of each flat. They say, that the passage was given by the builder. As also , the fire exit is only on one side of a wing , the other side is used by the same members ( the walls covered) with similar reasons. ( Given by the builder)
c) The fire security is under a big question mark. Shockingly and strangely , where as a shoe rack is a threat to fire ? But members who keep the shoe rack are penalized monthly.
d) Reminder letters has been ignored and only after repeated reminder they have answered that they do not agree . This was when the municipal plan and fire plans are asked by the concerned member to the managing committee the same is being denied.
Where as the bye laws says clearly that every member has a right to obtain documents by providing fees for obtaining the same.
e) A legal case , will put many members into problems as property tax for the said space has not been paid for the last 12 yrs by those who occupy a corner flat in which they are using the passage of around 50 sq ft as mentioned in point (b).
f) Can the court, if they find the decision of the managing committee wrong break open the walls for fire security ?
g) Can the passage be given back to the society ?.
h) Can the managing committee be put behind bars for illegally collecting money towards car parking every month from members who do not have a car parking space as they park their vehicles on the approach municipal road of our society.
i) Can stilt parking given by the builder and taxes paid and registered with the govt of Maharashtra be called illegal by the managing committee as some members do not have car parking space .
Awaiting your comments. Thanks for your patience in reading this.
Arohi
21 March 2018 at 10:57
I got selected in government job. But in interview I said that my father is a business man actually my father is a government employee but in attestation form I mentioned that my father is a government employee. I am worried that they will remove me from the job or not.
A.DEIVA NAYAKI
21 March 2018 at 00:06
Please guide me how to remove EB transformer from the home entrance
prasad
20 March 2018 at 22:07
in 2013 i have got the flat @2000.00INR/Sqft,now the flat price is arround 4000.00INR/SQFt
1)bank has approved 80% flat value as home loan & disbursed 80% of loan amount to builder,still 20% is not disbursed,how ever i am paying EMI as normal till today.
2)30 month bank from today builder run away & bank has taken his property bcz he became defaulter.,his all project has been stopped,even few project holders all ready filed cases against to builder.
3)almost 1year back from today we made it to association as per law to go to court or to find out better option to complete the construction but how ever its not completed & stopped because of shortage of fund,in our project only 30 or real customer ,40% land owner share,& balance flat has been given to supplier who has been giving material for project work..
4)Now i have lost my job & i have to pay rent/my daughter school fee etc.& more....even loan EMI,
5)bank is knowing every thing about the project.
6)i am not in situation to have regular payment,& there is no positive sign of construction.
7)flat registration is not executed bcz only 40% construction has been done based on my views.
8)kindly suggest me for better option what to do?
9)can i approach to court alone,bcz my hope is not making me to wait for longer.
Anonymous
20 March 2018 at 17:01
Peer to Peer Lending platforms act as exchange between one individual wanting to borrow & other one to lend. Both are individuals. P2P portal acts as payment gateway & broker between these two individuals in Money Lending & Borrowing Activity. There could be multiple transactions by an individual for lending to one or more individuals. The agreement & PDCs are part of documentation. PDCs are fvg P2P portal. Agreement is tripatriate. P2P portals are not registered NBFCs. Such Lending is legitimate in view of almost every state having their own Money Lending Act. Can Lender or P2P portal file recovery suit or cheque bouncing case in case of default by borrower.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Disconnection of water supply
in my society 100 members out of 209 , have not paid property Tax. TMC authorities have therefore disconnected our water supply even though we have paid the property tax much before the due date.
Is this correct ? I think it is illegal to disconnect the water supply without giving notice to the parties
Please advise , what should I do?
A. A Ghaisas