RAJINDER KUMAR GARG
08 June 2009 at 20:52
IHAVE TAKEN INSURANCE MEDI CLAIM AND I HAVE TO GO FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT OUTSIDE FROM MY PLACE
WETHER IAM ENTITLED FOR TRAVELLING EXPENSES WHICH I HAVE SPENT
KINDLY PROVIDE SPECFIC LAW
Khaleel Ahmed Mohammed
08 June 2009 at 19:39
Appointment of Notaries by central government are open or banned ?
Please up date me the critaria also?
REHAN G.SHAIKH
08 June 2009 at 12:08
i have purchased stamp paper of rs.250000/- from stock holding corporation of india ltd estamps. i have lost them as they got wet.now i have claimed for refund on the basis of preview given by SHCOI.
BUT STAMP OFFICIAL OF GUJARAT REFUSING TO GIVE REFUND ON THE GROUND THAT E-STAMPS ARE COVERED IN THE DEFINATION OF PAPER STAMPS AND ARE REFUSED TO GIVE REFUD.
SIR,WHAT REMIDY AVAILABLE TO ME TO GET MY MONEY BACK.ARE THERE ANY CASE LAWS IN WHICH REFUND SHOULD BE GIVEN IF STTAMP PAPERS ARE LOST AS THEY GOT WET AND NO TEXT IS VISIBLE IN STAMP PAPERS BUT ON INTERNET ON STOCK HOLDING CORPORATION SITE THEY ARE APEARING AND IN PREVIEW OF STAMP PAPER FULL TEXT IS VISIBLE.PLS SIR HELP ME
PLEASE SITE ANY SITATION IF AVAILABLE
jasvinder
06 June 2009 at 20:29
the applicant gave rs 50000.00 to one mr x on 1.5.2005 by cash as the same was well known to applicant.after great persutation x issued cheque on 18.6.07 of rs 50000.00 on name of applicant which was bounced due to insufficient fund on 27.7.2007. the applicant send regd notice to x on 14.08.07 which he refused to take as such applicant filed case on 11.09.07 against x which was on time.
applicant advocate gave a copy of complaint to applicant for cross examination.applicant submitted the chef in form of affidavit on basis of copy given by advocate.
at the time of cross x advocate asked various question the main was -when the applicant send the regd notice to x on the basis of copy of complaint and affidavit the applicant answered the date as 19.08.07. since the date was written wrong on complaint 19.08.07 instead of 14.08.07 and in same was written in affidavit of applicant i.e 19.08.07 the x advocate strongly opposed that the notice send to x as told by applicant in cross and affidavit was on 19.08.07 and same was not present in file.now what to do any case law
jasvinder
06 June 2009 at 18:10
the applicant gave rs 50000.00 to one mr x on 1.5.2005 by cash as the same was well known to applicant.after great persutation x issued cheque on 18.6.07 of rs 50000.00 on name of applicant which was bounced due to insufficient fund on 27.7.2007. the applicant send regd notice to x on 14.08.07 which he refused to take as such applicant filed case on 11.09.07 against x which was on time.
applicant advocate gave a copy of complaint to applicant for cross examination.applicant submitted the chef in form of affidavit on basis of copy given by advocate.
at the time of cross x advocate asked various question the main was -when the applicant send the regd notice to x on the basis of copy of complaint and affidavit the applicant answered the date as 19.08.07. since the date was written wrong on complaint 19.08.07 instead of 14.08.07 and in same was written in affidavit of applicant i.e 19.08.07 the x advocate strongly opposed that the notice send to x as told by applicant in cross and affidavit was on 19.08.07 and same was not present in file.now what to do any case law
RAVI SRIVASTAVA
05 June 2009 at 16:41
Dear Sir,
Please describe the procedure to Registration a New Company u/s 25 of Company Act for social work.
shweta
05 June 2009 at 14:06
what is the procedure before competition comission of india for cases which are pending before the mrtp commission?
what is the diff between d 2 procedures and what factors does one hav to take into consideration while dealing with these pending cases??
Sanjivani
04 June 2009 at 22:37
Hi,
My Name is sanjivani working as an advocate in mumbai jurisdiction since last 5 yrs, I wanted to apply for notary public and am novice to it..could any one of you please guide me through the procedure for me to procure the form for notary public...and how much it will be costing to me..
Your help will be very much appreciated..
Thanks & Regards
Sanjivani.
sanjay chugh
04 June 2009 at 16:25
1. As per Section 193 of the Act, minutes of the Board meeting are to be signed by Chairman of the meeting or Chairman of the succeeding meeting.
Our Chairman is busy getting business for the Company and does not have time for signing of statutory documents/minutes etc and wants to authorize the Vice chairman to do all the signing of paper work.. Can Chairman delegate duty of signing of the Board Minutes to the Vice Chairman, where there is one by authorising him to sign on his behalf?
2. Further, Can any Director execute General Power of Attorney to some other person/Director to do the following acts, deeds and things like:
1. To represent in meetings and cast vote
2. To sign papers/docs which may be required in the usual course of business in capacity as Director
3. To enjoy all the powers and benefits which in capacity of Director I am entitled to
4. To do all lawful acts necessary for performance of all my duties, obligations, rights and interests as a Director
Declaration : I hereby declarate that all such acts, deeds and things that may be done by my above Attorney by virtue of the powers hereby conferred shall be binding on me if done by me in personam and I ratify all such acts that may be done by my above said Power of Attorney holder.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
guardianship
A brother files for guardianship of another brother who is not a minor but is mentally retarded and he is granted guardianship which is challenged under a court of law
by a third brother who has been declared ex parte'who points out in court that guardianship has been granted under a false head and he should now be allowed to contest the guardianship.
Meanwhile the original guardian files for amendment under the Mental Health Act.
What should the court normally decide in this case whether to allow the third exparte brother to contest the case or not AND what action should the coourt take against the first brother who has already been granted the guardianship under a false representation of facts.The guardian gets the property share of the retarted brother also.