Amit Chawla
16 June 2010 at 00:48
Dear Mr. Ashish,
I had a talked with Mr. Anand and he told that no. which i have mention in my complaint is not responding, nobody had called me up from delhi police,i told to anand that you just hold the line let me call on that no. if somebody picks up than i will take you on conference, but when i called up on that no. somebody lifted the phone and told that mr. yadav is not available today he will available tommorow meanwhile mr. anand disconnected the line, so i called up to anand and told him that no. is working, why did you disconnected the line , so he told that's not in issue just tell me when you are going to pay the rest amount, i told him clearly that sir first you give me proper investigation report then we will talk on this, so he started blaming me that i am making excuses and my complaint is fake and all that, so i told him if my complaint is fake than i could not have mail to consumer court, to you and dcp & acp of delhi police, second thing when i called on that no. somebody picked up and told that mr.yadav will available tommorow ,it means you have not done proper investigation. you are giving me wrong reports and misguiding me.
Its a request to you kindly do proper investigation and revert back to me.
For any clarification you can call me on my cell no.
Amit Chawla
16 June 2010 at 00:47
Dear Mr. Ashish,
I had a talked with Mr. Anand and he told that no. which i have mention in my complaint is not responding, nobody had called me up from delhi police,i told to anand that you just hold the line let me call on that no. if somebody picks up than i will take you on conference, but when i called up on that no. somebody lifted the phone and told that mr. yadav is not available today he will available tommorow meanwhile mr. anand disconnected the line, so i called up to anand and told him that no. is working, why did you disconnected the line , so he told that's not in issue just tell me when you are going to pay the rest amount, i told him clearly that sir first you give me proper investigation report then we will talk on this, so he started blaming me that i am making excuses and my complaint is fake and all that, so i told him if my complaint is fake than i could not have mail to consumer court, to you and dcp & acp of delhi police, second thing when i called on that no. somebody picked up and told that mr.yadav will available tommorow ,it means you have not done proper investigation. you are giving me wrong reports and misguiding me.
Its a request to you kindly do proper investigation and revert back to me.
For any clarification you can call me on my cell no.
Anonymous
15 June 2010 at 21:31
I am a student(without 10th and 10+2) who have completed BA through distance education from Andhra University based on entrance examination held in Jan'1992. The eligibiity criteria for the then entrance test was 20 years as on July'1992.Passed the entrance and got admitted into BA course in May'1992 and completed graduation in the year 2007. Subsequently appeared for law entrance of AU and completed LL.B(3 years) through regular college study in April’2010.
My querries are:-
(i) Is there any minimum age limit at BA entrance level for myself being enrolled as an Advocate with AP Bar Council ?
(ii) I was told that I should have completed 21 years of age at the level of BA entrance exam for enrolment as Advocate. Is it true ?
(iii) What are the correct guidelines of BCI in the matter ?
(iv) What are the options left to me in case of non-enrolment as an Advocate in the light of All India Bar Examination in Dec’2010 ?
Your valuable suggestions and expert opinion is solicited since there are number of students like me who are on the same footing and hailing from remote villages. Your expert opinion will be of utmost help to us. Thanking you sir.
Anonymous
15 June 2010 at 21:26
Are the BCI, MCI, ICA, ICWA,
etc covered by the RTI.
If not, why not?
Nirmal A. Patel.
15 June 2010 at 20:19
Dear All LCI Members pls. send me ubder mention citations full text.
--Shriram City Union Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs. rama Mishra,AIR 2002 SC 2402:2002(9)SCC 613
--Lexicon Finance Limited Vs. Union of India and Others,2002(3)Arb.LR 60:2003(2) R.A.J. 316(Kar) (DB)
Jignesh Shah
15 June 2010 at 19:04
What an be the exact procedure for allocation of OPEN PARKING SPACE among the members who do not have stilt parking space?
Can a member oppose any change in parking pattern approved by majority members in general meeting?
One member consumes FOUR parking space while others have no place to park even a single vehicle, what action can be taken against member using multiple parking place??
Sandeep Jani
15 June 2010 at 18:45
I am staying at the Top floor of a ten storied building.
There is no provision of emergency fire exit on the EIGHTH FLOOR as required under fire safety norms in Mumbai.
We have one and only option at the time of emergency like Fire/ Earthquake to USE TERRACE for safety and escape.
Our society's office bearers have made rule to lock the terrace all the time.
Can I force them to keep open the terrace all the time for the safety of my family in case of emergency ??
What legal action can be taken against office bearers if they deny my request to keep open the terrace ??
Thanks in advance.
ANIL TREHAN
15 June 2010 at 18:01
Hello Sir,
From legal Articles point of view i want to know 10 most important recent 10 different legal issues on different Laws & if possible then give some websites addresses also to see already existing material on those topics.Please reply at nl.trhn@gmail.com
Thanking You.
Anonymous
15 June 2010 at 13:10
Hi,
Anyone has set up a e-commerce business in India.
I want to know the Legal and taxation implication for e-commerce business in India
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
is there any remedy?
"A" through his power agent/brother "C" entered into agreement with "C" to sell the property of "A" as he is in US. The period to execute Sale deed is 6 months. Advance amount 5 Lakhs.
At the end of 5th month, "C" flew to US and the letters sent by "A" to "C" returns as no such addressee.
In the meanwhile, "A" got information that "C" sold the said property to "X" and left away.
What is the remedy for "A"