Surender Oberoi
12 April 2011 at 13:04
Is SLP - Consumer Protection Act - termed as writ proceeding ?
Anonymous
12 April 2011 at 11:53
i want to share my thoughts but i m confuse about this site actually i m the mew user nd i have no much knowledge about the net. if sombody reply the ans of the question i want to ask somthing more to him but i m not foubding the option any where .
Anonymous
11 April 2011 at 23:52
Sir/Mam,
I m 2nd Year student of BBA LLB. My query is regarding my project topic:-
Hearsay Evidence—statutory accommodation in UK—civil and criminal cases
Actually,in this topic i m not getting sufficient material. so kindly help me and give some good material on this topic which can help me in my project and for presentation also.please reply as soon as possible.
Thankyou
samson daniel
11 April 2011 at 15:43
My father had nominated me for his Bank Of Baroda saving account and died of heart attack, I have the original copy of the nomination form but now the bank is asking for my other three brother’s signatures and making my case more complicated and not transferring my fathers fund to my account. Is my brother’s signature required?
But Central Bank Of India has already given me a demand draft of 1,50,000.00 /- with out any problem. The amount in Bank Of Baroda is 9,50,000.00
The below rules I got from the internet but could not under the details.
Nominee of bank account does not get succession rights
The Supreme Court (SC) has clarified the nominee of a depositor in a bank does not get ownership of the money in the account after death of the depositor. The nominee gets exclusive right to receive the money lying in the account. It gives him all the right of the depositor as far as the depositor's account is concerned, according to Section 45ZA of the Banking Regulation Act. But the banking law is not concerned with the succession. The money in the account will form part of the estate of the deceased depositor and devolve according to the rules of succession. In this case, Ram Chander vs Devender Kumar, one son was the nominee of his mother. After her death, he claimed he was the owner of the money in the account, to exclusion of his brother. The same rule will apply to government savings and other investments.
Please let me know in easy words are my brother signature required.
Thanks,
Samson Daniel
Amit Oza
11 April 2011 at 14:22
i had taken a loan on credit card. from citi bank in 2007, Rs 200000. i was paying the instalments regulary but due to some financial condition i was unable to pay. its is now 2and half years that i have not paid .i was receving calls from recovery agents and some how i paid some amounts. .what action they can take against me. my dad has received a call from citibank that they are filing a 420 case aginst me and my dad. i want to knw what should i do .the loan taken was on my credit card
Anonymous
11 April 2011 at 14:14
if some Dr.one is not authorised for surgery but he will do this due to his surgery patient condition is become serious and worst by the neglience of the docter which law is applicable on the and which act he is governed by docter and what remedies are avilable for the patient ?
Mohinder Singh
11 April 2011 at 14:04
i worked as an employee with LIC and retired ecently.my employers punished me in 1998 in the wake of an old and redundent circular issued in 1958. we are governed by the LIC employees regulations of 1960. the rules of 1958 were framed under the regulations of 1956, that were repealed when the new regulations of 1960 came into being. i appealed, but the AA also did not gave any reprieve. i filed a meorial but the same was rejected by the chairman in 2001. i filed a suit before the court of law in 2004, but the lower court also did not decided in my favouer and the case is now at the appeal stage before a ADJ. in the meantime the RTI came.
the CPIO in an information stated that the circular of 1958 was valid even in 1998. the AA also stated the same thing. the 2ndAA the CIC also ruled in the same manner as stated by the CPIO and AA. in a seperate RTI application the highest office of LIC informed that the rules were framed in 1958 to tackle a then prevailing matter and it was not in force thereafter. now i have filed a complaint before the CIC under section 18E of RTI act and the decision is still pending. is there any other remedy avaialable to me to bring the culprits in the book and the punsihment awarded after a charge sheet in 1998 be curtailed? please advise.
regards
Mohinder singh kamboj
mskamboj@thekimt.com
09354920313
11/4/2011
Anonymous
11 April 2011 at 13:57
Hi All,
I have a property which i got through unregistered will . That will was executed (written) on my name before my birth took place and the person who wrote the will expired before my birth took place.
I have the death certificates and legal heir certificates.
Now i approached a bank to give housing loan to construct a house . But they are saying that they stopped giving loans based on wills (whether it is registed or unregistered).
Can you please tell me how should i approach the problem ? how to get bank loan ? how to get documents of property converted to my name ?
Mangesh
11 April 2011 at 13:42
What is the meaning and difference of Interim and Final Directions of SEBI.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
whether licence is required to run mobile selling shop
whether licence is required to run mobile selling shop?