Anonymous
27 March 2010 at 13:48
Further to my query I need further clarification on this matter.
In this case where you suggested that the property of my grand father will have to be equally divided amongst my father and his 2 married sisters.
If this property is not divded and left as it is, then what will happen after these 3 people are not alive.
I am the only son of my dad and one aunty has 2 sons and 2 married daughters, another has 2 married daughters.
Please let me know if all of us will have equal share in the property or how it will be divided?
will the married daughters of my aunt have right on the property?
Christ
27 March 2010 at 13:22
Dear Friends,
I would like to know the formalities of converting an agricultural land to an industrial land in Tamilnadu. It would be really helpful if you can guide me step by step.
Thanks in Advance.
Anonymous
27 March 2010 at 10:30
My grandfather was alloted a plot through housing board. He had a WILL written for a portion of the land in the name of my mother.The WILL was subsequently probated in the court after his death.
Since there was no transaction in the sub-registrar office, will my mother's name reflect in the encumbrance certificate if i apply for one.
Will i have any legal issues later in this case. Also what is the procedure for including my mothers name in the encumbrance certificate.
Bankers and Builders are insisting on an encumbrance certificate though i keep telling them it is a probated WILL.
Would be happy if i have this query answered by your community.
bharat borikar
26 March 2010 at 23:54
sir, please tell me that what is the stamp duty under Bombay stamp act leaved on gift deed if gift deed made in favour of nepwee by his real uncle.
Anonymous
26 March 2010 at 21:59
Hi,
We have an ancestral property in punjab,and acc to my gradma's will she have mention my father as the only owner of the property. now the problem is that my one brother and a widow of my second brother also asking and pressuring my father for the share.
1) Can my father sell this property without give any share to anybody
2) can he transfer this property in some one else name.
kindly suggest some thing.
Shammi Arif Saifi
26 March 2010 at 20:46
What should be the treatment of amount received from my family on my partition.
Thanks
Shammi
Anonymous
26 March 2010 at 18:55
* May I have the format of Leave and License agreement?
* Does owner has the right to throw out tenant's stuff if Leave and License expires? This should be possible because Tenant is considered as trespaser after expiry of Leave and License.
* Can Police evict the tenant in case of Leave & License or only court (like in case of Lease)?
* If court has to be approached even in case of Leave and License then how Leave and License gives every rights to the owner to evict the tenant, than in case of Lease?
* Are the decisions from court faster in case of Leave and License agreements? This might also mean that court case is a matter of formality because tenant has no right to live in the property after expiry of Leave and License.
R. Prasad
26 March 2010 at 18:51
Dear Experts,
There was an agricultural land with number 105 and area 0.902 Hectare on a road side in the name of Mr. KP. The said road connects two towns( Town A and Town B) of the same district of UP. Some 4-5 years back I bought a portion of the land (No. 105). The sale deed for the said portion measuring 0.135 Hectare, square in shape, mentioning the boundaries - in North - road connecting town A and town B, in East – land of X and others, in South – the remaining portion of the land 105 of Mr. KP and in West - the remaining portion of the land 105 of Mr. KP, got executed by Mr. KP in the name of my wife V on date D.
After the execution of the above sale deed, Mr. KP executed another sale deed for another portion of land 105 in the name of N on the same date D. The descriptions for the second portion in the sale deed to N, are: area 0.65 Hectare, boundaries- in North - road connecting town A and town B, in East – land of V, in South – the remaining portion of the land 105 of Mr. KP and in West - the land of Y and others.
After the execution of the above mentioned sale deeds, the sale deeds along with parties were presented in the office of registrar for registration on the same date D. N got its sale deed registered with registration number R1 while V got its sale deed registered later with registration number R2.
Last year one KSK dealership from IOCL was rostered in my village on road connecting the towns A & B. The land requirement was 70ft X 70ft for KSK dealership. There were three applications from V, K and R. All the three applicants were called for interview and the result was declared on the same date by IOCL. K did not qualify as K got 0 marks against land & infrastructure. V got placed first and R got placed second. And V was the selected candidate.
But on the next day, K filed a Writ Petition in HC against IOCL alleging that there was favouritism and IOCL has awarded 0 marks in arbitrary manner. Moreover, V, the selected candidate was not made party. WP was heard by the HC and HC order that there is alternate remedy available i.e. the IOCL grievance redresal authority. HC further directed the IOCL to dispose of the matter within 3 months. Thereby, K & R submitted their representation complaints to IOCL. IOCL (state unit GM) called V, K & R and heard them one by one. After hearing, the GM/IOCL constituted one committee to investigate the complaints of K & R. During the investigation the investigating Officer asked me to bring the original sale deed of V and N. The same were shown to the officer.
Finally, in compliance of the HC order, GM/IOCL took the decision on basis of the report submitted by Investigating Committee, and cancelled the selection and ordered re-interview. GM/IOCL dismissed the complaints/allegations of K & R and stated that on basis of the report from Investigating Committee, IOCL erred in awarding 29 marks for land & infra. to V as V has not submitted the consent from co-owners - Mr. KP and N, of land 105 along with the application. Not submitting consent is in the contravention of the IOCL policy, said GM/IOCL.
Now my question is that even if there are clear boundaries of V’s portion in land 105, V is not free to use it for any purpose. V has to take consent from Mr. KP and N?
Or another interpretation of GM/IOCL could be that since N’s sale deed was registered before V’s sale deed‘s registration, N becomes first co-owner with Mr. KP in land 105, then the boundary of V’s portion vis-a-vis with N’s portion becomes unclear and that is why V has to take consent from N and/or Mr. KP.
How much this interpretation is legally sustainable? Please advise me the remedy if any as there is no appellate authority in IOCL.
Please note that a land measuring 0.135 H, square in shape has dimension 120ft X 120ft while IOCL’s requirement is 70ft X 70ft.
Thanks a lot
Sincerely
M. P.
Anonymous
26 March 2010 at 18:18
AFTER THE DEMISE OF A PERSON WHO HAS NOT LEFT ANY WILL,WHAT WOULD BE THE PROCEDURE FOR SELIING HIS RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY WHEN HE IS SURVIVED BY HIS WIFE,ONE SON ,THREE DAUGHTERS AND TWO SISTERS,ALL MARRIED AND SETTLED WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE FAMILIES.(WIFE IS STAYING WITH HER SON).ONE OF THE DAUGHTERS FOR CERTAIN REASONS HAS BROKEN ALL TIES WITH THE OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS AND WILL NEITHER PARTAKE IN THE SALE PROCESS NOR CAUSE ANY PROBLEM/HINDERANCE. ALSO BEFORE HIS DEMISE THIS PERSON HAD SOLD HIS AGRICULTURAL PROPERTIES AND HAD VOLNTARILY GIVEN A SHARE TO ALL, INCLUDING THE DAUGHTER WHO HAS BROKEN ALL TIES WITH THE OTHER MEMBERS.
Letters of Administration V/S Succession Certificate
Dear Sirs,
what is the difference between Letters of Administration & Succession Certificate. Preferably, please explain me at lenght and with examples.
Regards