Mrs.Lakshmi
20 November 2010 at 09:50
Dear Sir,
My father passed away a year back.The properties in his birthplace and the place he lived was registered in his name.On his decease,what are the documents required to make sure the property belongs to none other than his wife and two daughters in the circumstance he has an elder brother.His parents have deceased as well.
I have the death certificate,possession certificate,electricity connections of the properties in his birth place in
Trichur and place of stay in Palghat (as he relocated to Palghat) transferred to my mother's name .The legal heirship certificate from our Taluk has been received bearing just his wife and we daughters as the only legal heirs to his property.Is any other documents required to make the same secure and legally bound to avoid any threat from my father's elder brother.Your response is highly appreciated.
Lakshmi
Anonymous
20 November 2010 at 07:35
Dear Friends - I need ypur help !!!!
I stay with my younger son who owns that house and allowed to stay my elder son & his family in house (since last 4 yrs) which is owned by me.
But on demise of my elder son, daughter in law went to her parent’s home ( mika) keeping house in her custody with lock & key.
Daughter in law is asking to transfer the house on her name for which I am reluctant
If I brake the lock & start using my house, what would happen?
How to face if she complains against me with false statement ?
What is the way out?
Thanx & regards,
valarmathi
19 November 2010 at 19:40
Hello,
I need all your support and expert advice. 13(2) was issued against a company in which 5 people are directors. 3 out of 5 directors have now relocated to Mumbai. The mortgaged properties are in Coimbatore. The notices sent to Mumbai address (from which one of the directors sent us a letter requesting time for mobilizing funds - 15 days before issuance of 13(2)) were returned "Not Claimed". Should the substituted notice be published in Maharashtra too? We have already published in two dailies here at Coimbatore.
I require your help at an earliest possible date. Please forward related files to mathivalar80@gmail.com
Thank you.
Harish
19 November 2010 at 19:34
In 2007 due to compulsion I purchased house plot as joint property with my wife with a loan from ICICI Bank for the full amount shown in the registered document.Then I build a house on it.Due to compulsion from her father my wife want to divorse me, sell the house and get 50% of the same saying that half of the investment is theirs.I filed a case and they try to prove their investment by showing the bank deposits her father made in to my account in different dates in different tranactions. Most of the money was my business money and some I even returned to him in cash.But now the cash deposits are concrete evidence for investment. My wife is a house wife. Will the court consider the cash deposits by her father as investment.These deposits are with the declaration of my PAN number and it shows that the deposited money is a transaction from my PAN.CanI win the case and get full right of the property and a divorse from this cheat?
Arati Gawde
19 November 2010 at 18:48
If both the parties want cancel the transaction (Sale of immovable property), then whether it is necessary to pay full stamp-duty on property at the time of registration ? or Rs.100/- franking is enough for Cancellation Deed.
anand
19 November 2010 at 17:24
Sir my query is that PARTITION BY FATHER DURING LIFETIME IF THE PROPERTY is JOINT PROPERTY with others i.e[father in law]. We made a compromsie decree and made mutation entery in our father share in the property extract and the compromsie decree is passed by honable court in the year 2006 before that there is case pending in the court that my father filed a case for seprate possission and partition.on25-10-2010 the honable court given prelimanary decree. i want to ask that we made a compromsie decree and enter our name in our father share, and we are not distrubted other shares which joint with us ,that one of the respondend filed a suit on compromsie decree that it is ILLEGAL .PLZ SOLVE MY PROBLEM.
Anonymous
18 November 2010 at 23:08
There is a joint bank account in the names of X and Y, not related to each other, and the operation powers are only with X. i.e. the bank account is not as 'either or survivor' nor as 'former or survivor' and it only states that operation by 'first' i.e. by X only. The bank had accepted such operation instructions. Y had no power of operation at all.Neither Y had any cheque book nor had deposited any amount in that account. Now X had died leaving substantial amount in that account and legal heirs P and R, but X had not made any nomination or any will. Now the query is
(1) Whether Y, the mere joint holder without power of operation, gets any right in the amount in such joint account?
(2) Whether Bank owes any liability towards Y who is not related to deceased X and when Y had no power of operation?
(3) Whether any decided case law on this point?
Suhas
18 November 2010 at 20:08
Hello,
I want to purchase agricultural land in Konkan Maharashtra. Recently I have come across a land near Dapoli that was gone from original owner due to Kul-Kayada. Now the 'Kul' wants to sell it off. My queries:
1. in 7/12 of such lands, which all names appear? Only that of 'Kul' or original owner or both?
2. Whether the Kul has right to sell such land off?
3. What are the risks in purchasing such land?
Thanks,
Suhas
Chandbhai Chand Shaikh
18 November 2010 at 19:41
Dear sir, I have purchased a propery and it was learnt then that the property(agricultural land) was under dispute in court for partition. Now I have made both the parties for compromise and parties are ready for sulenama. Now during the negotiation it was decided to give some part of my purchased property to other party and receive the same portion inexchage. Is it possibe by court to give me that portion of exchanged land directly on my name without repurchasing from registrar?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
purchase of the Government property
Govt issued the photopass to one who enchroachd upn its land in Mumbai. The enchrochr gives the Notarised POA to anthr one in 1989. The power agent sells the Hut structre togthr wth the land underneeth standng on collector's land by makng Registerd Deed of Conveyance in 1989. The new purchaser (N/P) then begs to Govt to insert his name in the Photopass by submitting 1)Gumasta liscence standing in the name of (N/P)in 1986 2)Estimate letter of electricity supply issued in the name of the (N/P) by electricity co. in 1986 3)Electricity bill of 1992 in the name of (N/P)4)The said Deed of Conveyance of 1989. ARE THE DEAL AND THE AUTHORITIES DIRECTION TO INSERT THE NAME OF THE NEW PURCHASER (N/P)IN THE PHOTOPASS VALID AS PER LAW?