shyam
19 July 2015 at 13:52
Sir,
My father purchased a 6 marla property 10 year ago from a party.registry is OK Location of property is mentioned in registry. But due to mistake of patwari at that time in intqaal it shows our property as only a part of 3 hactare total property of selling party without mentioning its location.now at present value of our 6 marla is much more as compare of remaining.so selling party claiming that they sold 6 marla land at somewhere else (not there ,where at present we constructed house and shops) and they filing case in court.mistake was from government side.we were not aware of all these at that time....
Please suggest some solution...what to do now
Thank u
abhay
19 July 2015 at 12:55
If mortgage deed is for bank loan is registered in maharashtra after paying stamp duty of maharashtra but this d�ed also includes property of chhatisgarh. SRO offflice sent memo with d�ed to SRO chhatisgsrh.SRO chhaishgarh sent the doc. to collector stamp. Nayalaya collector of stamp at chhatisgarh issued notice to appear before him with origional deed. What is to be done by us. what is duty in chhatosgarh o n mortgage deed for bank loan.loan amt.is 50 cr.Please advise.
anilkumar yadav
16 July 2015 at 12:34
an area has not been urbanised u/s 507 of DMC, for revenue purposes Punjab Land Revenue Act 1883 applies. Now for the construction of houses MCD is passing building plan only for the property which are on-road. Not for the other properties which are in the street.
Why so?
As far as I know Delhi Land Reform Act and Punjab Land Revenue Act does not applies to urban areas.
Correct me if I am wrong and kindly advice.
ketan
14 July 2015 at 15:25
We have a piece of land (Devasthan inam) at dapoli dist. my grandfather had given this land on lease to a person, he died after this his wife's name came to 7/12 in column iter hakk. After her death her daughter's name are written on 7/12. I heard that these entries are illegal because land is devasthan inam and 32G is not applicable to this land I want remove these name from 7/12 Please advise
urmish udani
14 July 2015 at 09:51
Facts ...I am owner of 224 Hector of land..since 2003 mutation in my name..there were proceedings against my predecessor in title in 1976..revision in 1979 by govt under this act..was dropped clearly observing that the land is OSAD and does not fall in the defination of agricultural land at all..the land is falling in the notified area under section 113A of MRTP act..and required for CIDCO for township. .while mutating in 2003 circle officer observed that land is submerged in sea water and also falls in industrial zone hence can't be treated agricultural land..in acquition process in 2004 the land n survey officer observed the land is full of mud hence they could not even put survey table on the entire land..however the acquition was not complete and hence was laps as per new land acquitionact. .now suddenly SDO issues notice under ceiling act..to show why the land should not be declared as a surplus land..pls advise whether in the light of this the land can come in the ambit of ceiling act? ?whether is it open for SDO to issue such notice?
Manjunatha
13 July 2015 at 18:32
We are fighting for removal of encroachment of Public road, and local authority is on the way to serve the notice to encroached people, the encroached people are trying to get stay or TI form court, if any no stay or TI order to stop them getting stay of TI orders
khalil
12 July 2015 at 17:13
My friend develope n.a plot ground plus two floor apartment by panchayat n.o.c.and after complition he got aprovel and assesments for for blocks he paid house rent too.when he sold the block to his customer and went to reqister on third party name ,Reqistere refuse to except the document and ask for tpa.kindly explain the legal prosedure
hinal shah
12 July 2015 at 15:07
my grand father has 2 sons & one shop on tenancy basis for more than 30-35 years. the landlord of the shop is not there since long time. In an around sept 2008 my grand father was detected by cancer & he use to stay with his younger son. in dec 2008 my uncle asked my grand father to make will in which he asked him to mention to transfer shop in my grand mothers name and after my grand mother it to be transfer to him( my uncle).He has also attached some local dr. certificate as my grand father is psychically & mentally alright. (where as he was detected by cancer in sept). he also accompanied my grand father to make a will things were just hidden from my father there were two witness 1. the lawyer son who made the will & 2. an neighbor who use to stay next to my uncle. my grand father had made will even in 2002 wherein he has not mentioned anything about the shop property. this was done only when my uncle came to know that my grand father has cancer on last stage. my grand father passed away in apr 2009.
now my query is can a tenant shop will be registered.
can we challenge this will
can my father get what he has to legally because he is also the legal son.
what can we do
kindly help me please
Thnaks a lot
Harish
11 July 2015 at 13:56
Hi,
My father has land,beside to that there is relatives land. relatives did not carry out agriculture in their land for almost 50years, so we are doing in that. Now they are asking the land, we are ready to give the land but they have mutated the pahni with new entry from couple of years and ours land is also included in that. pahni which they have updated is not known to us till now.
Untill now we irrigated the land so is the land belongs to us ?
I heard that there is land rule like that.
So kindly let me know what I should do.
refer any cases or documents related to mutation, land rules.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Non compliance of s. 63 (1) a of bombay tenancy act
Hello to my senior practitioners, please provide any information when a non agriculturist purchases an agricultural land taking benefits of S.63(1) A of Bombay tenancy act ( in Maharashtra), whereas he is not willing to use the said land for the purpose as prescribed by this section and now wants to sale it further. Can he sale that land further by the virtue of any provisions of law? is there any authority on this subject? I want to help my client on this topic.