Anonymous
10 December 2017 at 12:55
Dear sir my father is three brother . his younger brother get some property in deed of gift ( atainama) in kritrim putra form. That time my father and another uncle is nawalik ( under age) and family is jointed. so I know that my father and my another uncle have ligal right in my younger uncle geted in deed of gift ( atainama) property.
DSSAnyal
10 December 2017 at 09:57
We have undivided & joint land property area about 0.31 acre(18 kattah approx) in our father's name in howrah. We are eight co sharer resides thereon. Is the any part land will come under land ceiling limit under prevailing land ceiling act in the HMC area.What is the upper ceiling of vacant land can be hold in single owner's name in westbengal.
Satyabhusan
10 December 2017 at 01:07
Hello,
The land owner(now dead) sold his land to a lady from whom I purchased the same land. In both the sale deeds, the sons have signed as witnesses. One of the grand child (father now dead but had signed as witness in my sale deed) claims his share and is threatening legal proceeding. I have half constructed a house and got electric connection in my name since 2014. The boundary wall is built and the gate has not been fixed. Applied for mutation and is pending in the settlement office.
Please advise as to what is my legal standing in this case.
Anonymous
08 December 2017 at 23:02
Dear sir.
Please advise me on following matter.
In 1987 my father and his brother bought a property which is 6300 sq/ft, and for purchasing of property amount is shared by both but property is registered on his brother's name only (my ancle), and since it is purchased till the today whole year tax is borned by my father and now he is planning to shell the property, meanwhile he is giving us only 2400 sq/ft of that area.
So please help me on following questions
1. Do we have any legal way to claim 50:50 of that property.
2. Although this is not a ancestors property but bought this jointly.
3. Since 1987 my father is paying yearly land/property tax.
Ajay
08 December 2017 at 22:55
My Great Grandfather had 5 Sons, A,B, C, D ,E and before their death They had distributed the agricultural land and property among their children.
Now after the many years of distribution passed when there has been development of road near A and B's land, and A & B by their own income has made some addition to thier land by making a building nd home on that. Then C,D,E want to redistribute it,
is it possible, if yes then what is the options available for A & B legally to save Themselves.
Debanjan Ray
08 December 2017 at 22:19
I have been allocated a single stilt car parking by our builder 15 years back in Bangalore. Dimension of car parking: 4.14 meter x 5 meter. As per BBMP building bye laws, minimum car parking dimension should be 3 meter x 6 meter. While allocating in sale deed, the Builder admitted that since required length is less, they compensated by giving more width (between two pillars). After that, I started parking two cars within 4.14 meter width without hindering any other's parkings. Now our Association issued me a letter to remove my 2nd car. They even painted a rectangle around one of my cars, and declared that outside the boundary I do not have any authority to park my 2nd car. I have a copy of the car parking drawing approved by BBMP, in which no particular dimension is mentioned for any car park in our complex. I also found as per bye-laws of Deed of Declaration(DoD) (Ref: Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act & Rules), Association does not have Power and Authority to define car parking and segregate any portion of common area. DoD mentions undivided common area for each apartment, and also mentions that car parking is part of common area, but does not show further subdivision of each car parking area.
Can anyone suggest on this case?
NAND KISHOR KUMAR
08 December 2017 at 20:07
Is vishwakarma belongs from sc/st in bihar, if yes can I purchase land from that person? Please suggest me
DAYASAGAR MEHER
08 December 2017 at 16:51
I am a Headmaster of a school. That the school premises measures about 1.08 acre as per 1955 settlement and there is a boundary for that.
But after the settlement carried out in 2014, a person of the same village claimed that 13 decimal of school premises has been registered in his name. He carried out demarcation as per new settlement and the 13 decimal he was claiming was within the school premises. But as per new record the school premises was also 1.08 acre(unchanged with respect to previous settlement).
There might be some error in the map as per the new settlement. But the said person has broken down, some part of the school boundary and constructed a small house within the school premises (around 2 decimal). This is creating an uneasy situation for the teachers as well as students. I had informed the subcollector, block education officer and tahasildar as well. But no action was taken against the said person nor any action taken to correct the land record.
my question is
1. Was the construction of house by the said person as per law.
2. if no, then what action can be taken against him.
3. What action can be taken to remove the person out of school premises.
Anonymous
07 December 2017 at 12:27
I would like to know the process to complain against illegal encroachment in a MHADA property reserved for School/ Educational institution in Mumbai Suburbs. MHADA site does not give any complaint link. Please advise as the encroachment is a growing menace and also causing serious health and social issues at the cost of Children's Education. Thanks in advance.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Hsa 2005 case
MY MOTHER HAVING 4 BROTHERS AND TWO SISTERS. THE FOUR BROTHERS PARTITIONED THE PROPERTY WITHOUT GIVING SHARE TO THE WOMEN MEMBERS DURING THE YEAR 1986. THE PROPERTY BELONGS TO FATHER OF MY MOTHER. THE PROPERTY CAME TO MY GRAND FATHER BY WAY OF PARTITION BETWEEN HIS BROTHER.
MY MOTHER ONLY FILED SUIT AGAINST THE ILLEGAL PARTITION CLAIMING EQUAL RIGHT. THE DISTRICT COURT GIVEN 1/35 SHARE TO MY MOTHER. MY MOTHER APPEALED AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT CLAIMING EQUAL RIGHT DURING THE YEAR 2004 IN THE COURT OF CHENNAI HIGH COURT, TILL DATE THE CASE IS PENDING, SO FAR NO HEARING.
PLEASE LET ME KNOW THE HSA 2005 ACT APPLICABLE TO THIS CASE.
REGARDS
S. RAVICHANDRAN