Anonymous
28 October 2009 at 17:25
my flat is a rented flat.rent receipt is in the name of grandfather landlord refuses to transfer i am afraid he may not aaccept me as tenant after my mother
Anonymous
28 October 2009 at 12:09
THIS IS REGARDING THE LAND GRABBING CASE. A MIDDLE CLASS PERSON ( PLAINTIFF )HAS HIS PLOTS WHO HAS PURCHASED IN THE YEAR 1980, AND IN THE YEAR 2004, THE LAND MAFIA GANG HAVE CREATED BOGUS GPA OF THE OWNER ( PLAINTIFF) AND HAVE AGAIN CREATED BOGUS SALE DEEDS COLLUDING WITH SUB REGISTER AND HAVE MADE SEVERAL TRANSACTIONS OF SALE WITHIN A SPAN OF 1 MONTH.
THE REAL OWNER OF THE PLOTS COMES TO KNOW ABOUT THIS ILLEGAL TRANSACTIONS IN THE YEAR 2006 WHEN SOMEONE COMES AND PLACES SHED IN HIS PLOTS AND HAS FILLED A CASE IN THE COMPETENT CIVIL COURT FOR " SUIT FOR DECLARATION" . AND SIMULTANEOUSLY CALLED AND CANCELLED FOR THE FRADULENT INSTRUMENTS ( GPA AND THE VARIOUS SALE DEEDS).
WHEN THE OWNER ( PLAINTIFF) HAD PURCHASED THE PLOTS IN YEAR 1980, HE HAS TAKEN IT FOR RS 1,50,000/- AND NOW THE MARKET VALUE OF THE PLOTS IS 15 LAKHS.
AND ACCORDING TO THE RECENT NOTIFICATONS THE SUPREME COURT HAS STRONGLY DISSAPPROVES THE SALE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY THROUGH GPA. AND THERE IS A 13 PAGE WRITE UP FROM THE LORDSHIP OF JUSTICE R V RAVEENDRAN AND JUSTICE J M PANCHAL REGARDING THIS SALE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY THROUGH THE GPAH AS NULL AND VOID.
BUT UNDER "SUIT FOR DECLARATION" THE COURT FEE HAS TO BE PAID ON THE MARKET VALUE OR RS 1000 /- WHICH EVER IS HIGHER ACCORDING TO THE KARNATAKA COURT FEE ACT 1958.
THE PERSON WHO OWNS THIS PLOT WAY BACK IN 1980 WHO HAD PURCHASED FOR RS 4000/- AND NOW THAT THE LAND VALUE HAS INCREASED , AND THE PERSON WHOSE IS NOT FINANCIAL SOUND TO PAY SUCH HEAVY COURT FEE , IS THERE ANY CITATIONS FROM THE APEX COURT TO SUPPORT THE REAL OWNER ( PLAINTIFF ) WHO HAS GONE IN FOR 'SUIT FOR DECALARTION" THAT THE COURT FEE CAN BE EXEMPTED UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES.
IF COURT FEE IS THE TECHNICAL ISSUE FOR PROCEEDING THE CASE THEN WHAT IS THE USE FOR A COMMON MAN TO GO AND ASK FOR JUSTICE IN THE COURT? HERE THE PLAINTIFF IS NOT ONLY VICTIM OF THE LAND MAFIA'S BUT IS ALSO NOT GETTING JUSTICE IN THIS REGARD FROM THE COURT WHO HAS KEPT FAITH IN THE LAW.
KINDLY PLEASE GIVE CITATIONS WHICH SUPPORTS THE PLAINTIFF IN THIS REGARD AND WOULD BE OF GREAT HELP TO THE SOCIETY.
Chintu
27 October 2009 at 23:21
Hi All,
I have bought two properties in 2008 Oct and Nov respectively. My Question is related to Partition Agreement and transfer of rights.
The two properties was an ancestral property to Party A and Party B , but the land was in the name of Party B;s father as he was the elder son of the family at the time off the demise of Grandfather of Party A's and B's . I have bought the land from Party A 2.27 Acres and Part B 1.22 Acres respectively in Oct & Nov 2008. These agriculture land had been partitioned by revenue authority the Tahsildar office in 1989 and the Tahsildar office has passed the order then to get the Katha created on Party A and Party B with their respective Share of land and both parties have agreed to the same and got their Katha certificates and RTC documents. (The Land was initially written on the name of Party B's Father. As he was the elder son of the family). In 1997 as the land prices has gone up. Party B filed a suite in Civil court objecting to the partition order passed by Tahsildar office (Tumkur) Karnataka, India. Court has upheld the partition order of Tahsildar and Dismissed the petition of the Party B.Again in 2007 he has filed a fresh petition claiming the ownership of the land based on the old documents which was in his fathers name. we had less knowledge at the time of my purchase of these lands. One of the broker got us both the lands as they were adjacent. When we bought the land we checked all the records and they were paying taxes and RTC along with Katha was in Party A (2.26 Acre) and Party B (1.22 Acre) respectively and we registered both the lands as per the records they had and the Katha has been transfered to my name along with RTC. Now I have converted the land from District Commisioner to Residential purposes. Recently Party B came to know that I have bought Party A's land and he wants to give an objection or may be move the court to stop registeration process of Party A's property.
Need help in understanding what rights Party B has on Party A's land and how can he create trouble in the registration process.
Thx..
Anonymous
27 October 2009 at 21:51
Hi,
I have to apply for home loan to buy a flat.
What is the best approach fixed or floating? why?
which bank should i prefer?
LIC housing loan
SBI
PNB
Anonymous
27 October 2009 at 17:07
Sir/ Madam,
I am a practising CA, my father in law owns ancestral property. This property is divided into two parts- 2 shops facing the road and the remaining area used for our residential purpose.
The said 2 shops have been given on rent long back by my father in law' father. As regards one of the shops, my father in law has filed an eviction case after unsuccessful informl requests to the tenant. As i am in need of premises for starting my own practise, we have filed such eviction proceedings.
The lower court has already ruled in our favour, however the tenant has appealed further citing that the lower court has ignored his hardship pleas and that the lower court has ruled inefficiently.
The case is in process, the next higher authority being the High court.
I would like your expert opinion on:
1. Similiar case references-
Supreme court rulings and other Court rulings details.
2. Hardship is suffered by us too, his claim seems preposterous, just to milk the situation to his advantage by trying to emotionally pressurise us.( He has already accepted having 2 other businesses apart from the one he carries in our premises)
Kindly give your learned opinion on the matter. Thanks
bindhu
27 October 2009 at 12:55
I am male, hindu
if i get immovable property from my mother through will
can i make a will giving that immovable property to third party
my son and wife has any right on that immovable property
bindhu
26 October 2009 at 21:11
i am a hindu male
what is ancestor property
if i get property from my father is it ancestor property
or
if i get propety from my mother is it ancestor property
SHYAMSUNDER BUBNA
26 October 2009 at 17:53
MAX PARTS PVT LTD incorporated on 12-8-1964
As on today Company Status is under Liquidation
Property Location
Revenue Survey No. 421/Paiki, Jamnagar, Hapa
Plot No. 13
T. P. Scheme No. 3/A
Original Plot (O.P.) No. 24
Final Plot (F.P.) No. 57
Near Paglam & Paglam
Opp. Cold Storage, Jamnagar
Area 7160 Sq. Ft.
Purchased by Company on 28th September 1964 from Shri Narendrasingh Madhusingh Kher by a agreement registered on 30th September 1964
On 30-4-1984
One Mr. Girjashanker Jatashanker Bhatt C/o. M/s. Harish Automobiles, Kashi Vishwanath Road, Jamnagar sold the property alleged to be Power of Attorney holder of the Company
to
one Mr. Kantilal K. Kotecha Advocate having address at J-5, 2nd floor, Super Market, Jamnagar and 26 Modern Market, Near Amber Cinema, Jamnagar on behalf of and alleged to be Power of Attorney holder of one Smt. Lilavanti Revashanker Bhatt, having address at Ambika Bhavan, 1 Nagar Para, Jamnagar
On 19-8-1993
Mr. Kantilal K. Kotecha Advocate having address at J-5, 2nd floor, Super Market, Jamnagar and 26 Modern Market, Near Amber Cinema, Jamnagar on behalf of and alleged to be Power of Attorney holder of one Smt. Lilavanti Revashanker Bhatt, having address at Ambika Bhavan, 1 Nagar Para, Jamnagar sold the property
to
1) Smt. Jaishreeben Arvindkumar Machchhar having address at Bhanushalee Wad, Sheri No. 4, Jamnagar
2) Smt. Jyotiben Prakashkumar Lakhani having address at Nagar Para near Pili Bangli, Jamnagar
On 20-3-1998
Smt. Jaishreeben Arvindkumar Machchhar having address at Bhanushalee Wad, Sheri No. 4, Jamnagar released the property
To
Smt. Jyotiben Prakashkumar Lakhani having address at Nagar Para near Pili Bangli, Jamnagar
As per record with Jamnagar Area Development Authority as on 17-4-2006 the property is in the name of Company
The Company was initially formed by one Shri Jamnadas G. Jivrajani at Bombay
The previous directors retired in or about May 1975 and
1. Shyamsunder S. Bubna
2. Jeevanlata S. Bubna
has been joined as directors of the Company.
On 19-7-1983 a notice sent to the Share Holders and also published the said notice in Mah Gov Gazette dated 28-7-1983 and English and Marathi News Paper under Sec 500 of Companies Act as the information for meeting of creditors to be held on 11-8-1983
On 8-9-1983 the notice for information under sec 516 for appointment of Liquidator has been published in Mah Gov Gazette and English and Marathi News Paper
On 7-6-1984 the notice for information under sec 509 notice convening final meeting has been published in Mah Gov Gazette and English and Marathi News Paper
P.S. THE ALLEGED POWER OF ATTORNEY OF MAX PARTS PVT. LTD. FAVOURING MR. GIRJASHANKER JATASHANKER BHATT USED FOR SALE OF PROPERTY ON 30-4-1984 IS LIKELY TO BE PREPARED AND EXECUTED IN BOMBAY AS ALL THE DIRECTORS AS WELL AS LIQUIDATOR AND/OR COMPANY IS ALSO INCORPORATED AT BOMBAY ONLY
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
about will
I am male, hindu
my mother made a will stating that after her death the imoveable property goes to my father
(my father died before my mother)
the condition she has put--
if her husband (my father)doest make any will then it will go to bindhu
my mother also made a will in my name and my father also made will in my name
propety is in my mothers name
but my questionis is : am i getting this propety from my fahter or from my mother (if i get this propety from my father then is it going to be ancestor propety? can my wife and son can claim?)
or can i make a will to third party