Anonymous
26 October 2011 at 21:23
happy diwali to all the members.
1)my fatherinlaw sold his selfearned property.2)after selling he got cheque from the purchaser.3)that particular cheque was on my fatherinlaw name4)he deposited that cheque in joint account which holds names of my fatherinlaw,hiswife,his son,his daughter.
5)with that particular money he buyed a flatfor his son.by himself giving cheque to the builder. agreements & share certificate are on his son name.now the son is selling the flat.mother and daughter are asking share saying that it is a joint property.6)i want to know weather it is a joint family property.and will they get share in the particular flat which he buyed for his son.fatherinlaw has expired
Anonymous
26 October 2011 at 21:05
I was going through some case laws it is held that Limitation act will not apply to Usufructuary Mortgage. Mortgagor is entitled to redeem the property even after 30 years. Is that correct?
Case name: SUPREME COURT
2005(4) RCR(Civil) 841 Harbans V Om Praksh and Others
Panchanan Sharma v.Basudeo Prasad Jaganani& others JT 1997(10) SC 553
High court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigara
Karnail Singh & ORS V Dharam Singh
Harbans V Om Prakash
Anonymous
26 October 2011 at 20:50
There is a wakf property which is occupied by unauthorized occupient. Both the cases decreed in favour of Punjab wakf board1968 and appeal of unauthorized occupant dismissed with cost in District and Session Court in 1969. But wakf board not filed execution application.Now that property is demolished and unauthorized occupant died.What is the way to implement above judgements
Anonymous
26 October 2011 at 20:46
There is a wakf property which is occupied by unauthorized occupient. Both the cases decreed in favour of Punjab wakf board1968 and appeal of unauthorized occupant dismissed with cost in District and Session Court in 1969. But wakf board not filed execution application.Now that property is demolished and unauthorized occupant died. Now pls intimate me who is owner of wakf totally demolished property.
Anonymous
26 October 2011 at 20:42
The flat i have purchsed in nearing completion. as per the sale agreement, the installments are equally divided into completion of each slab, exterior plastering, interior plastering, plumbing, electrical and other works. the builder sends demand notice on completion of every floor floor certified by the architect. now the last three slabs have been completed and the same was certified by the architect for payment. the builder has now intimated me that the work of all the slabs and exterior and interior plaster have been completed and to make payment for all the work completed. however, the architect has certified completion of all the slabs but not certified completion of exterior or interior plaster. Could you please advise me whether i am liable to pay for the work not certified by the architect?
Anonymous
26 October 2011 at 13:22
pls guide me about Section 107 of Punjab Wakf Act. Also intimate me latest amendment in this Section and latest citation
on this section
Anonymous
26 October 2011 at 12:30
i purchased the rights of a property in 1997 which was yet to be allotted to a person . the seller excuted ats, gpa and other papers in my favour , which were not registered .The seller also executed a registered Will in my favour . The seller got dishonest . I filed my objections with the dda . The dda allotted property to the seller in july 2003. the seller died in august 2003. his cousin brother( say "W" ) claiming to be his real brother got the mutation in his favour by submitting documents showing him the real brother of seller . thereafter the "W " sold the property to third party ( X ) . thereafter "X" further sold the property to Y and Y sold it to Z . Now the property is with "Z" . In august 2007 i asked for the documents of the concerned file from dda under RTI . DDA refused . I filed appeal with CIC . CIC allowed my appeal in june 2009 . Therafter also dda did not give documents to me . I filed a probate petition in court . As per my knowledge i submitted the names "W" and his children in trhe list of relations . The court issued notiuce and a public notice was also published in newspaper as required under law . The "W" thru his advocate made appearance in court and stated to file reply . thereafter in further hearing nobody appeared on behalf of "W" .The court proceeded Ex - Parte . Finally the probate order was issued in my favour by the court .
After great pursuasion dda gave me documents under RTI in september 2011. from the documents it was revealed that the "W' had furnished forged documents showing him as real brother of seller .
Whereas the fact is that the children( 2 brother 3 sister ) of real brother of the seller are alive and they were not aware of all these things . I approached the real LR's( say "RH" ) of seller . one brother and one sister have given the no objection to dda in regard to mutation in my favour. the other 4 "RH" are silent .
Now my querey :
1. does the probate order issued in my favour by court where "RH' were not shown in list of relations valid and binding upon the "RH" also .
2. Does The publication in the newspapers in the probate case tantamounts to the notice served on "RH" also .
3. How can i get back my property?
4. What are the shortest and easiest or proper legal remedies available with me .
REGARDS
Vishal
26 October 2011 at 12:26
Dear Readers,
Can anyone pls help me in letting me know the process of getting a certified copy of sale deed which was executed in 1949?
I have the copy of the same but it is not legible.
The property is under Bangalore Corporation limits.
Please help me with the process and duration to obtain the same.
Regards,
Vishal
skanda vallishayee
26 October 2011 at 10:35
hi my name is geetha born on 1952 in karnataka. i want to know whether i would get equal share in my fathers property.
i filled a suit on 1992 where court has given its verdict saying that we don't get equal right as it is an ancestors property in 2005. after the recent amendments in 2005 we again filled a new suit in 2008. till date no partition has happened and only preliminary decree has taken place and none of brothers have taken steps for partition and registration, know i want to know whether i would get share in my fathers property ? please help me on this
note: i was born in 1952.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Famliy property dispute
Dear Sir,
I have a problem i.e., my father and his 2 brothers had started partnership business in 1976.still we are in joint family my father is younger to all; the thing is all properties are registered on his elder brothers and their sons. my father has no property on his name. These properties are purchased from the business income from 1976 and their after. Hence I plead you, kindly give me your valuable suggestions