Gargi Ranade
08 December 2011 at 09:38
Dear all,
Kindly let me know, Can Company use the Stamp paper which has been brought by the individual on his own name , who is not employee of the Company??
Thanks & Regards,
Gargi
Anonymous
08 December 2011 at 02:21
PLEASE TRY TO MAKE ME UNDERSTAND THAT WHO CAN SIGN A CERTIFICATE?
A CERTIFICATE SIGNED BY A PANDIT FROM A YOGASHRAM CERTIFIED THAT HE HAS PERFORMED A WEDDING WITH HINDU RITES IN HIS YOGASHRAM AND JUST MENTIONED THE NAMES OF THE BRIDE AND GROOM AND THEIR ADDRESSES AND NO SIGNATURES OR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE BRIDE AND THE GROOM.
THE SAME CERTIFICATE WAS LATER USED BY THE OTHER PARTY TO REGISTER A FAKE WEDDING IN THE SDM COURT WITHOUT OUR KNOWLEDGE.
AFTER I.O. WENT TO THE PANDIT HE DENIED THAT HE HAS NOT PERFORMED ANY SUCH WEDDING AND HAS ALSO SAID THAT THEY ARE NOT HIS SIGNATURES. FURTHERMORE, HE ADDED THAT THE LETTER HEAD AND THE STAMP ARE FROM HIS YOGASHRAM, AND THAT A LOT OF PANDITS COME HERE AND LEAVE, SO HE HAS NO KNOWLEDGE HOW THIS HAPPENED BUT HE DID NOT PERFORM THE WEDDING. (HOWEVER HIS NAME IS SAME AS THE PERSON'S NAME IN THE CERTIFICATE).
THE OTHER PARTY HAS NOW AFTER THE STATEMENT OF THE PANDIT HAS CHANGED THEIR STORY AND IS NOW SAYING THAT THEY HAVE NOT MENTIONED ANYWHERE THAT HE WAS THE SAME PERSON WHO PERFORMED THE WEDDING AND THAT THERE WAS SOME ONE ELSE.
HOWEVER THE CERTIFICATE SAYS AS FOLLOWS:
"THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT WEDDING OF MRS. ...................... D/O SH. ............................ R/O ................... WITH MR. ......................... S/O. .......................... R/O. ......................... WAS SOLEMNISED ACCORDING TO THE HINDU RITUALS ON ....................... IN THE PREMISES OF ....................... YOGASHRAM .............................
PLACE. ................. -S/D-
DATE. ....................... NAME OF PANDIT WHO HAS DENIED TO THE I.O.
BELOW THE NAME OF THE PANDIT IS THE STAMP OF THE PLACE WHICH IS NOT MATCHING THE NAME OF THE PLACE MENTIONED ON TOP OF THE CERTIFICATE."
PLEASE HELP ME WITH SOME AUTHORITIES OF SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES THAT CAN BE USED IN MY CASE TO PROVE THIS FAKE MARRIAGE, SINCE VERY CLEVERLY THE OTHER PARTY HAS SUCCEDED IN TAKING MY SIGNATURES TO GET THIS FAKE MARRIAGE REGISTERED. ALTHOUGH I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT WE ARE PRESENT THERE FOR OUR COURT MARRIAGE AND NOT THE REGISTERATION OF A MARRIAGE THAT HAS NEVER TAKEN PLACE.
vinay vaidhya
07 December 2011 at 18:09
if there are two partition deed how to cancel the duplicate one
Dharmendra More
07 December 2011 at 13:33
Dear Experts,
I have a problem in finding one of my uncle's grandfather's name as well as any proof of his birth or death as he died in Pakistan many years before my uncle's birth .My Uncle was born in 1945 in Pakistan. His family had to leave their house & all our belongings suddenly due to fear of their lives in Pakistan during the partition. Further my uncle's father died when he was 9 years old in India. He has to furnish his grandfather's details to ROC. From where he can get his father's details in India. Kindly suggest any legal procedure in this respect
Anonymous
05 December 2011 at 11:00
Dear experts,
Kindly explain about process to make a will. Is this a court process. How many & which type witness require for a will? When a will impliments?
Regards,
R. S. SHARMA
srrevani
04 December 2011 at 10:15
inadvertently one document was marked though it required stamp duty. are there any judgments to not to consider said document. pls immediately help me...badly require for my suit
Vijay Talesara
04 December 2011 at 08:54
Dear sirs
I have one show room size 22 ft x 44 ft i.e.924 sq ft. I sold an portion of 7.5 ft by 20 ft to my daughter by Registered sale deed 4 Years back. now the groundfloor is less than 900 sq ft which is in my name .
as per Rajasthan nagar vikas Tax amendment
if a property is less than 900 sq ft no Nagarvikas Tax is applicable.
Nagarparishad is not considering our sale
made to daughter and want to take Tax on whole premises saying this sell is inyour books and you have to get it amended in our parishad They are saying aply for division and after approval accordingly action will be made . since the plot was taken for 99 years lease . kindly suggest what to d0 to solve the problem
vijay talesara
Anonymous
03 December 2011 at 13:51
Dear sirs
I have given my showroom on lease for Three years to Readymae garment enterprise for Three years .I have taken Adv Rs 390000/00 as a security refundable while vacceting the premises. rent is 95000/0 p.m
wehave paid a sum of Rs 34200/oo as stamp duty demanded be Registrar office in Udaipur.The Audit has asked us to deposite a sum of Rs 2104623/00 more.we couldnot understand this demand . The have told us that on secnd notice you will be heard
kindly suggest us where to plea for this
harreshment.
vijay singh talesara
Anonymous
30 November 2011 at 23:55
i gave the flat on leave and license basis for the 11,month to tenant,they paid the compensation for the 3,months further not pay the rent on time i orally communicate to give rent on time but they refuse and also further not giving any rent for 2,months, can i file a case in court,but the agreement neither registered nor a notarized how to evacuate the tenant from home, pls give favorable recommendation.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Retaintion of original title deeds by the bank
i have been discharged by the court as a gurantor but still bank is not ready to release our title deeds of a property saying that
" you have been discharged as a gurantor but not as a mortgauger, and they hold a recovery certificate against the principal borrower, so under the provision of law, the bank can encash my property to recover their dues from the principal borrowers."
It is important to note that I havn't mortgauged the said property as it was just simple deposit of title deeds at a branch of the bank which is situated at Panvel (which is not a notified area under section
58(f) , transfer of property act 1882 and till today bank hasn't registered any motgauge deed or created any charge on it.
As I understand, once a gurantor is discharged by the court, he or she no more remains continuing as a mortgauger for their property.
I need few clearifications on the issue as under.
(1) Can the bank encash my property under the
circumstances mentioned above, even if I am discharged as a gurantor and never mortgauged my property.(it was just a simple deposit of title deeds of my property in a non-notified area's branch of the bank, which was not registered by the bank)
(2) Is it lawfully correct whatever bank says? (i.e.a gurantor needs to get discharged in both way , as a gurantor and as a mortgauger seperately and specifically)
(3) Do I need to approach the court for rectification of the order? (which in fact I would like to avoid as it costs a lot)