This discussion addresses the late application of Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to call a bank manager as evidence in cheque dishonour cases under the Negotiable Instruments (NI) Act. It argues that such applications are often inappropriate at the final argument stage, particularly when the dishonour of a cheque should be proven by bank slips or memos, not oral evidence. The content highlights that relying on oral testimony to prove documentary evidence is generally not permissible and questions the necessity of recalling a bank manager when the cheque and return memo have already been exhibited and considered.