Advive

Bhika Reghiwale (Querist) 23 September 2015 This query is : Resolved
S
We submitted the following proofs in district registrar office for proving illegal matter of money lending.
1. The court judgement copy in which it accepted by momey lender that He done a business of money lending with Adil , who is a signed witness in the agreement , and on which agreement only the above illegal loan complaint is also based / transaction was made

2. The affidavit of Adil ( who is singned witness in u/r agreement ) stating this contract to sale is made for security porpose only.
3 He is having no liecence.
4. The repeated transactions M.L. executed three / four times up to 27 months and not come to saledeed execution.
Are above proofs (documentry proofs ) sufficient to prove this savkari matter in case of farmer.please guide with identical case law.
He has also no proof exept agreement and cheque payment.This also covers a time essence clause and violation of the contract three times.

r.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Guest (Expert) 23 September 2015
Very vague description of the case !!

Illegal money lending, distict registrar office, money lender as witness to agreement, Adil signed witness, contract to sale, sale deed execution, violation of the contract, all do not have proper links to the case.

By the way, for what pupose you want identical case law, when the judgment is accepted by the money lender?